summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Remove docg4Boris Brezillon1-1437/+0
The diskonchip G4 driver does not fit very well in the raw/parallel NAND framework simply because such chips have an internal controller translating DoC-specific commands into NAND ones. Keeping such a driver in the raw NAND framework is a real burden for NAND maintainers. Not to mention that some parts of this driver are a bit worrisome: - writes are done by subpages, even though we're interfacing with an MLC chip which are known to not support subpage writes very well (it might be that the FTL handles the complexity for us though) - some part of the code are simply ignoring return codes of function that can fail in a few occasions - there's a hack to support OOB writes when no data is provided. This operation is not supported by the chip and should have been rejected, and nandwrite and other userspace tools should have been patched to deal with such devices - the driver is apparently broken when ignore_badblocks module param is not set to 1 and nobody noticed that (don't know since when this is the case, but it's not a recent change) http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2018-July/082472.html Add to that the fact that we already have a docg3 driver in drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.c and, looking at the code (and regs), it seems docg3 and docg4 have a lot in common (even the author of this driver seemed to have realized that interfacing with the raw NAND framework might have been a bad idea http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-January/039517.html). For all these reasons, I'm proposing to remove this driver. If anyone ever wants to add support for this chip back, I'd suggest extending the docg3 driver instead of adding a completely new driver. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Cc: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com> Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> Cc: Sergey Larin <cerg2010cerg2010@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->erase()Boris Brezillon1-2/+2
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->erase() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->waitfunc()Boris Brezillon1-2/+2
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->waitfunc() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->cmdfunc()Boris Brezillon1-2/+2
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->cmdfunc() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->block_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon1-3/+3
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all chip->block_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->select_chip()Boris Brezillon1-2/+1
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle the chip->select_chip() hook. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->write_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon1-5/+5
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all chip->write_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to chip->read_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon1-8/+5
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all chip->read_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to ecc->write_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon1-9/+8
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all ecc->write_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to ecc->read_xxx() hooksBoris Brezillon1-10/+10
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers and hooks to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one or remove the mtd_info object when both are passed. Let's tackle all ecc->read_xxx() hooks at once. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Acked-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to nand_release()Boris Brezillon1-1/+1
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one. Now is nand_release()'s turn. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-10-03mtd: rawnand: Pass a nand_chip object to nand_scan()Boris Brezillon1-1/+1
Let's make the raw NAND API consistent by patching all helpers to take a nand_chip object instead of an mtd_info one. We start with nand_scan(). Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-08-27mtd: rawnand: docg4: Remove wrong __init annotationsGeert Uytterhoeven1-2/+2
If gcc (e.g. 4.1.2) decides not to inline init_mtd_structs() and read_id_reg(), this will cause section mismatches, and crashes: WARNING: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.o(.text+0xc10): Section mismatch in reference from the function docg4_attach_chip() to the function .init.text:init_mtd_structs() The function docg4_attach_chip() references the function __init init_mtd_structs(). This is often because docg4_attach_chip lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of init_mtd_structs is wrong. WARNING: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/docg4.o(.text+0xc3e): Section mismatch in reference from the function docg4_attach_chip() to the function .init.text:read_id_reg() The function docg4_attach_chip() references the function __init read_id_reg(). This is often because docg4_attach_chip lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of read_id_reg is wrong. Fix this by dropping the now incorrect __init annotations from init_mtd_structs() and read_id_reg(). Fixes: 66a38478dcc5b5a3 ("mtd: rawnand: docg4: convert driver to nand_scan()") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
2018-07-31mtd: rawnand: docg4: convert driver to nand_scan()Miquel Raynal1-26/+45
Two helpers have been added to the core to do all kind of controller side configuration/initialization between the detection phase and the final NAND scan. Implement these hooks so that we can convert the driver to just use nand_scan() instead of the nand_scan_ident() + nand_scan_tail() pair. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-07-31mtd: rawnand: better name for the controller structureMiquel Raynal1-2/+2
In the raw NAND core, a NAND chip is described by a nand_chip structure, while a NAND controller is described with a nand_hw_control structure which is not very meaningful. Rename this structure nand_controller. As the structure gets renamed, it is logical to also rename the core function initializing it from nand_hw_control_init() to nand_controller_init(). Lastly, the 'hwcontrol' entry of the nand_chip structure is not meaningful neither while it has the role of fallback when no controller structure is provided by the driver (the controller driver is dumb and can only control a single chip). Thus, it is renamed dummy_controller. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
2018-07-18mtd: rawnand: docg4: fix the probe function error pathMiquel Raynal1-10/+12
nand_release() should not be called on an MTD device that has not been registered. While it should work thanks to the checks done in mtd_device_unregister() it's a bad practice to cleanup/release something that has not previously been initialized/allocated. Rework the error path to follow this rule. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
2018-03-20mtd: rawnand: rename SET/GET FEATURES related functionsMiquel Raynal1-2/+2
SET/GET FEATURES are flagged ONFI-compliant because of their name. This is not accurate as non-ONFI NAND chips support it and use it. Rename the hooks and helpers to remove the "onfi" prefix. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
2018-02-16mtd: nand: move raw NAND related code to the raw/ subdirBoris Brezillon1-0/+1421
As part of the process of sharing more code between different NAND based devices, we need to move all raw NAND related code to the raw/ subdirectory. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>