summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-02-08drm/xe/display: Fix memleak in display initializationXiaoming Wang1-6/+0
intel_power_domains_init is called twice in xe_device_probe: 1) intel_power_domains_init() xe_display_init_nommio() xe_device_probe() 2) intel_power_domains_init() intel_display_driver_probe_noirq() xe_display_init_noirq() xe_device_probe() It needs remove one to avoid power_domains->power_wells double malloc. unreferenced object 0xffff88811150ee00 (size 512): comm "systemd-udevd", pid 506, jiffies 4294674198 (age 3605.560s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 10 b4 9d a0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff8134b901>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1c1/0x2b0 [<ffffffff812c98b2>] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [<ffffffffa08b0033>] __set_power_wells+0xc3/0x360 [xe] [<ffffffffa08562fc>] xe_display_init_nommio+0x4c/0x70 [xe] [<ffffffffa07f0d1c>] xe_device_probe+0x3c/0x5a0 [xe] [<ffffffffa082e48f>] xe_pci_probe+0x33f/0x5a0 [xe] [<ffffffff817f2187>] local_pci_probe+0x47/0xa0 [<ffffffff817f3db3>] pci_device_probe+0xc3/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8192f2a2>] really_probe+0x1a2/0x410 [<ffffffff8192f598>] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x160 [<ffffffff8192f6ae>] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [<ffffffff8192f92a>] __driver_attach+0xda/0x1d0 [<ffffffff8192c95c>] bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd0 [<ffffffff8192e159>] bus_add_driver+0x119/0x220 [<ffffffff81930d00>] driver_register+0x60/0x120 [<ffffffffa05e50a0>] 0xffffffffa05e50a0 The call to intel_power_domains_cleanup() needs to stay where it is for now. The main issue is that while the init is called by the display side, shared by i915 and xe, the cleanup is called by a non-shared code path. Fixing that will be done as a separate commit. Fixes: 44e694958b95 ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support") Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Wang <xiaoming.wang@intel.com> [ reword commit message and explain why the fini needs to stay where it is ] Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240202215658.561298-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 86c99abb5f1b6fcd69fb268eeb2e34cb7c4f355c) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe: Encapsulate all the module parametersBommithi Sakeena1-2/+2
Encapsulate all the module parameters in one single global struct variable. This also removes the extra xe_module.h from includes. v2: naming consistency as suggested by Jani and Lucas v3: fix checkpatch errors/warnings v4: adding blank line after struct declaration Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bommithi Sakeena <bommithi.sakeena@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe/display: Use acpi_target_system_state only if ACPI_SLEEP is enabledFrancois Dugast1-2/+11
This fixes the build error below with CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c:334:23: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_target_system_state’; did you mean ‘acpi_get_system_info’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 334 | bool s2idle = acpi_target_system_state() < ACPI_STATE_S3; Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe/display: Improve s2idle handling.Maarten Lankhorst1-2/+4
We accidentally always pass true as s2idle argument, instead of calculating it in the same way as i915. Suspend modes were removed to achieve compatibility with i915, but accidentally left in the source code. While at it, fix all other cases too, s2idle will go into a D1 state and setting a lower power state should be handled by PCI core. Maybe my laptop stops draining so much power during suspend now? I can only hope.. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2023-12-21drm/xe/display: Implement display supportMaarten Lankhorst1-0/+411
As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915 driver so that there is maximum reuse there. We do this by recompiling i915/display code twice. Now that i915 has been adapted to support the Xe build, we can add the xe/display support. This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately this squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits. But let's try to add a few from the squashed patches: Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>