| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Similar to the staging around handling of engine->submit_request, we
need to stop adding to the execlists->queue prior to calling
engine->cancel_requests. cancel_requests will move requests from the
queue onto the timeline, so if we add a request onto the queue after that
point, it will be lost.
Fixes: af7a8ffad9c5 ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307134226.25492-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 47650db02dd52267953df81438c93cf8a0eb0e5e)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Previously, we would spin waiting for all waiters to wake up and notice
their request had completed before we would reset the seqno upon
wraparound. However, we can mark their waits as complete and wake them
up directly using the existing machinery for handling the flushing of
missed wakeups when idling.
Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306130143.13312-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Since commit fd10e2ce9905 ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted
signalers"), we cancel the signaler when retiring the request and so
upon wraparound, where we wait for all requests to be retired, we no
longer need to spin waiting for the signaling thread to release its
references to the in-flight requests, and so we can assert that the
signaler is idle.
References: fd10e2ce9905 ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306130143.13312-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Mostly doc/print messages that were not updated after commit e61e0f51ba79
("drm/i915: Rename drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request").
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180222172405.11386-1-michel.thierry@intel.com
|
|
We want to de-emphasize the link between the request (dependency,
execution and fence tracking) from GEM and so rename the struct from
drm_i915_gem_request to i915_request. That is we may implement the GEM
user interface on top of requests, but they are an abstraction for
tracking execution rather than an implementation detail of GEM. (Since
they are not tied to HW, we keep the i915 prefix as opposed to intel.)
In short, the spatch:
@@
@@
- struct drm_i915_gem_request
+ struct i915_request
A corollary to contracting the type name, we also harmonise on using
'rq' shorthand for local variables where space if of the essence and
repetition makes 'request' unwieldy. For globals and struct members,
'request' is still much preferred for its clarity.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180221095636.6649-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
