| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
In order to use a common VSC SDP Colorimetry calculating code on PSR,
it uses a new psr vsc sdp compute routine.
Because PSR routine has its own scenario and timings of writing a VSC SDP,
the current PSR routine needs to have its own drm_dp_vsc_sdp structure
member variable on struct i915_psr.
In order to calculate colorimetry information, intel_psr_update()
function and intel_psr_enable() function extend a drm_connector_state
argument.
There are no changes to PSR mechanism.
v3: Replace a structure name to drm_dp_vsc_sdp from intel_dp_vsc_sdp
v4: Rebased
v8: Rebased
v10: When a PSR is enabled, it needs to add DP_SDP_VSC to
infoframes.enable.
It is needed for comparing between HW and pipe_state of VSC_SDP.
v11: If PSR is disabled by flag, it don't enable psr on pipe compute.
v12: Fix an inconsistent indenting
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-15-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
|
|
Commit 60c6a14b489b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase
once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier
causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here
moving to the end of i915_driver_modeset_probe() when the display is
all initialized.
Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the
atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking and
it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens.
Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable() or
intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not
allow PSR to be enabled.
v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set()
v3: Check intel_dp before get dev_priv
v4:
- renamed intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() to
intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- removed the set parameter from intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- not calling intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() from
intel_psr_enable/update(), directly setting it after the same checks
that intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() does
- moved intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() arm call to
i915_driver_modeset_probe() as it is a better for a PSR call, all the
functions calls happening between the old and the new function call
will cause issue
Fixes: 60c6a14b489b ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151
Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221212635.11614-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
Recent improvements in the state tracking in i915 caused PSR to not be
enabled when reusing firmware/BIOS modeset, this is due to all initial
commits returning ealier in intel_atomic_check() as needs_modeset()
is always false.
To fix that here forcing the state compute phase in CRTC that is
driving the eDP that supports PSR once. Enable or disable PSR do not
require a fullmodeset, so user will still experience glitch free boot
process plus the power savings that PSR brings.
It was tried to set mode_changed in intel_initial_commit() but at
this point the connectors are not registered causing a crash when
computing encoder state.
v2:
- removed function return
- change arguments to match intel_hdcp_atomic_check
v3:
- replaced drm includes in intel_psr.h by forward declaration(Jani)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112253
Reported-by: <s.zharkoff@gmail.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106152128.195171-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
No need to unmask PSR interrutpion if PSR is not enabled, better move
the call to intel_psr_enable_source().
v2: Renamed intel_psr_irq_control() to psr_irq_control() (Lucas)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-3-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.
display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.
v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
