Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
MTL introduces a second FBC engine. The two FBC engines can
operate entirely independently, FBC A serving pipe A and
FBC B serving pipe B.
The one place where things might go a bit wrong is the CFB
allocation from stolen. We might have to consider some change
to the allocation strategy to have a better chance of both
engines being able to allocate its CFB. Maybe FBC A should
allocate bottom up and FBC B top down, or something? For the
moment the allocation strategy is DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST for both.
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817122624.213889-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Let's make sure FBC is always disabled when we start to take
over the hardware state.
I suspect this should never really happen, since the only time
when we really should be taking over with the display already
active is when the previous state was progammed by the BIOS,
which likely shouldn't use FBC. This could be driver init,
or S4 resume when the boot kernel doesn't load i915. But I
suppose no harm in keeping this code around for exra safety
since it's quite trivial.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315140001.1172-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
By the time intel_fbc_global_disable() gets called during driver
teardown we should have already disabled all the crtcs, so
no way FBC should be enabled at this point.
And I have no idea what the other user (i915_restore_display())
is even trying to achieve.
So let's just throw intel_fbc_global_disable() into the bin.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315140001.1172-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
Expose FBC debugfs files for each crtc. These may or may not point
to the same FBC instance depending on the platform.
We leave the old global debugfs files in place until
igt catches up to the new per-crtc approach.
v2: Take a trip via intel_crtc_debugfs_add() (Jani)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211213151435.9700-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Parametrize ilk+ FBC register offsets based on the FBC instance.
v2: More intel_ namespace (Jani)
v3: Don't break gvt (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211214184616.1410-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
|
Reduce include dependencies using forward declarations.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fb54050e03f830a1b29eb14cb37466f39c499cc2.1639142167.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
In order to better encapsulate the FBC implementation
introduce a small helper to do the plane<->FBC instance
association.
We'll also try to structure the plane init code such
that introducing multiple FBC instances will be easier
down the line.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211124113652.22090-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
In order to encapsulate FBC harder let's just move the debugfs
stuff into intel_fbc.c.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211124113652.22090-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
The underrun code doesn't need to know any details about FBC, so
just pass in the whole device rather than a specific FBC instance.
We could make this a bit more fine grained by also passing in the
pipe to intel_fbc_handle_fifo_underrun_irq() and letting the FBC
code figure which FBC instance (if any) is active on said pipe.
But that seems a bit overkill for this so don't bother.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211124113652.22090-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
There's no need to store all this stuff in intel_fbc_state_cache.
Just check it all against the plane/crtc states and store only
what we need. Probably more should get nuked still, but this
is a start.
So what we'll do is:
- each plane will check its own state and update its local
no_fbc_reason
- the per-plane no_fbc_reason (if any) then gets propagated
to the cache->no_fbc_reason while doing the actual update
- fbc->no_fbc_reason gets updated in the end with either
the value from the cache or directly from frontbuffer
tracking
It's still a bit messy, but should hopefuly get cleaned up
more in the future. At least now we can observe each plane's
reasons for rejecting FBC now more consistently, and we don't
have so mcuh redundant state store all over the place.
v2: store no_fbc_reason per-plane instead of per-pipe
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211124113652.22090-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
In preparation for multiple FBC instances start passing around
intel_fbc pointers rather than i915 pointers. And once there are
multiple of these we can't rely on container_of() to get back to
the i915, so we toss in a fbc->i915 pointer already.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211104144520.22605-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
Pull the direct FBC register frobbing out from the debugfs code
into the fbc code. Also add a vfunc for this so we don't need
extra platforms checks.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211104144520.22605-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
Move the direct FBC status register reads from the debugfs code
behind an abstract api.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211104144520.22605-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
Pull the fbc enable vs. disable stuff into a small helper so
we don't have to have it pollute the higher level modeset code.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210702204603.596-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
|
Instead of dealing with the presence/absence of the primary
plane in the higher level pre/post plane update code let's
move all that into the fbc code itself. Now the higher level
code doesn't have to think about FBC details anymore.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213133453.22152-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
|
|
On glk+ the hardware gets confused if we disable FBC while
it's recompressing and we perform a plane update during the
same frame. The result is that top of the screen gets corrupted.
We can avoid that by giving the hardware enough time to finish
the FBC disable before we touch the plane registers. Ie. we need
an extra vblank wait after FBC disable.
v2: Don't do the vblank wait if we never activated FBC in hw
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128150338.12490-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Not sure where the single pipe only restriction came for fbc1.
Nothing I can see that would prevent this.
v2: Nuke no_fbc_on_multiple_pipes() too
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127201222.16669-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Change the calling convention to just pass the state+crtc and
switch to intel_ types throughout.
We'll also do a quick s/if (old_primary_state)/if (new_primary_state)/
so that we'll be able to eliminate old_primary_state later. This
is fine since we always have either both old and new state or neither.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127190556.1574-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.
display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.
v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com
|