summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
10 dayscpufreq: nforce2: fix reference count leak in nforce2Miaoqian Lin1-0/+3
commit 9600156bb99852c216a2128cdf9f114eb67c350f upstream. There are two reference count leaks in this driver: 1. In nforce2_fsb_read(): pci_get_subsys() increases the reference count of the PCI device, but pci_dev_put() is never called to release it, thus leaking the reference. 2. In nforce2_detect_chipset(): pci_get_subsys() gets a reference to the nforce2_dev which is stored in a global variable, but the reference is never released when the module is unloaded. Fix both by: - Adding pci_dev_put(nforce2_sub5) in nforce2_fsb_read() after reading the configuration. - Adding pci_dev_put(nforce2_dev) in nforce2_exit() to release the global device reference. Found via static analysis. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
10 dayscpufreq: s5pv210: fix refcount leakShuhao Fu1-2/+4
[ Upstream commit 2de5cb96060a1664880d65b120e59485a73588a8 ] In function `s5pv210_cpu_init`, a possible refcount inconsistency has been identified, causing a resource leak. Why it is a bug: 1. For every clk_get, there should be a matching clk_put on every successive error handling path. 2. After calling `clk_get(dmc1_clk)`, variable `dmc1_clk` will not be freed even if any error happens. How it is fixed: For every failed path, an extra goto label is added to ensure `dmc1_clk` will be freed regardlessly. Signed-off-by: Shuhao Fu <sfual@cse.ust.hk> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
10 dayscpufreq: dt-platdev: Add JH7110S SOC to the allowlistHal Feng1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit 6e7970cab51d01b8f7c56f120486c571c22e1b80 ] Add the compatible strings for supporting the generic cpufreq driver on the StarFive JH7110S SoC. Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
10 dayscpufreq/amd-pstate: Call cppc_set_auto_sel() only for online CPUsGautham R. Shenoy1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit bb31fef0d03ed17d587b40e3458786be408fb9df ] amd_pstate_change_mode_without_dvr_change() calls cppc_set_auto_sel() for all the present CPUs. However, this callpath eventually calls cppc_set_reg_val() which accesses the per-cpu cpc_desc_ptr object. This object is initialized only for online CPUs via acpi_soft_cpu_online() --> __acpi_processor_start() --> acpi_cppc_processor_probe(). Hence, restrict calling cppc_set_auto_sel() to only the online CPUs. Fixes: 3ca7bc818d8c ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs") Suggested-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org) <superm1@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-11-24cpufreq: tegra186: Initialize all cores to max frequenciesAaron Kling1-6/+21
[ Upstream commit ba6018929165fc914c665f071f8e8cdbac844a49 ] During initialization, the EDVD_COREx_VOLT_FREQ registers for some cores are still at reset values and not reflecting the actual frequency. This causes get calls to fail. Set all cores to their respective max frequency during probe to initialize the registers to working values. Suggested-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-11-24cpufreq/longhaul: handle NULL policy in longhaul_exitDennis Beier1-0/+3
[ Upstream commit 592532a77b736b5153e0c2e4c74aa50af0a352ab ] longhaul_exit() was calling cpufreq_cpu_get(0) without checking for a NULL policy pointer. On some systems, this could lead to a NULL dereference and a kernel warning or panic. This patch adds a check using unlikely() and returns early if the policy is NULL. Bugzilla: #219962 Signed-off-by: Dennis Beier <nanovim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-10-23cpufreq: CPPC: Avoid using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as transition delayRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+12
[ Upstream commit f965d111e68f4a993cc44d487d416e3d954eea11 ] If cppc_get_transition_latency() returns CPUFREQ_ETERNAL to indicate a failure to retrieve the transition latency value from the platform firmware, the CPPC cpufreq driver will use that value (converted to microseconds) as the policy transition delay, but it is way too large for any practical use. Address this by making the driver use the cpufreq's default transition latency value (in microseconds) as the transition delay if CPUFREQ_ETERNAL is returned by cppc_get_transition_latency(). Fixes: d4f3388afd48 ("cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us") Cc: 5.19+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.19 Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io> [ added CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS definition to include/linux/cpufreq.h ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-10-19cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix object lifecycle issue in update_qos_request()Rafael J. Wysocki1-3/+5
commit 69e5d50fcf4093fb3f9f41c4f931f12c2ca8c467 upstream. The cpufreq_cpu_put() call in update_qos_request() takes place too early because the latter subsequently calls freq_qos_update_request() that indirectly accesses the policy object in question through the QoS request object passed to it. Fortunately, update_qos_request() is called under intel_pstate_driver_lock, so this issue does not matter for changing the intel_pstate operation mode, but it theoretically can cause a crash to occur on CPU device hot removal (which currently can only happen in virt, but it is formally supported nevertheless). Address this issue by modifying update_qos_request() to drop the reference to the policy later. Fixes: da5c504c7aae ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement QoS supported freq constraints") Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2255671.irdbgypaU6@rafael.j.wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-10-19cpufreq: tegra186: Set target frequency for all cpus in policyAaron Kling1-2/+6
[ Upstream commit 0b1bb980fd7cae126ee3d59f817068a13e321b07 ] The original commit set all cores in a cluster to a shared policy, but did not update set_target to apply a frequency change to all cores for the policy. This caused most cores to remain stuck at their boot frequency. Fixes: be4ae8c19492 ("cpufreq: tegra186: Share policy per cluster") Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-10-15cpufreq: scmi: Account for malformed DT in scmi_dev_used_by_cpus()Florian Fainelli1-0/+10
[ Upstream commit cd5d4621ba846dad9b2e6b0c2d1518d083fcfa13 ] Broadcom STB platforms were early adopters (2017) of the SCMI framework and as a result, not all deployed systems have a Device Tree entry where SCMI protocol 0x13 (PERFORMANCE) is declared as a clock provider, nor are the CPU Device Tree node(s) referencing protocol 0x13 as their clock provider. This was clarified in commit e11c480b6df1 ("dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Extend bindings for protocol@13") in 2023. For those platforms, we allow the checks done by scmi_dev_used_by_cpus() to continue, and in the event of not having done an early return, we key off the documented compatible string and give them a pass to continue to use scmi-cpufreq. Fixes: 6c9bb8692272 ("cpufreq: scmi: Skip SCMI devices that aren't used by the CPUs") Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-10-02cpufreq: Initialize cpufreq-based invariance before subsysChristian Loehle1-9/+11
[ Upstream commit 8ffe28b4e8d8b18cb2f2933410322c24f039d5d6 ] commit 2a6c72738706 ("cpufreq: Initialize cpufreq-based frequency-invariance later") postponed the frequency invariance initialization to avoid disabling it in the error case. This isn't locking safe, instead move the initialization up before the subsys interface is registered (which will rebuild the sched_domains) and add the corresponding disable on the error path. Observed lockdep without this patch: [ 0.989686] ====================================================== [ 0.989688] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 0.989690] 6.17.0-rc4-cix-build+ #31 Tainted: G S [ 0.989691] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 0.989692] swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: [ 0.989693] ffff800082ada7f8 (sched_energy_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rebuild_sched_domains_energy+0x30/0x58 [ 0.989705] but task is already holding lock: [ 0.989706] ffff000088c89bc8 (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: cpufreq_online+0x7f8/0xbe0 [ 0.989713] which lock already depends on the new lock. Fixes: 2a6c72738706 ("cpufreq: Initialize cpufreq-based frequency-invariance later") Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-09-09cpufreq: intel_pstate: Check turbo_is_disabled() in store_no_turbo()Rafael J. Wysocki1-7/+12
[ Upstream commit 350cbb5d2f676bff22c49e5e81764c3b8da342a9 ] After recent changes in intel_pstate, global.turbo_disabled is only set at the initialization time and never changed. However, it turns out that on some systems the "turbo disabled" bit in MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE, the initial state of which is reflected by global.turbo_disabled, can be flipped later and there should be a way to take that into account (other than checking that MSR every time the driver runs which is costly and useless overhead on the vast majority of systems). For this purpose, notice that before the changes in question, store_no_turbo() contained a turbo_is_disabled() check that was used for updating global.turbo_disabled if the "turbo disabled" bit in MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE had been flipped and that functionality can be restored. Then, users will be able to reset global.turbo_disabled by writing 0 to no_turbo which used to work before on systems with flipping "turbo disabled" bit. This guarantees the driver state to remain in sync, but READ_ONCE() annotations need to be added in two places where global.turbo_disabled is accessed locklessly, so modify the driver to make that happen. Fixes: 0940f1a8011f ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not update global.turbo_disabled after initialization") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/bf3ebf1571a4788e97daf861eb493c12d42639a3.camel@xry111.site Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site> Tested-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-09-09cpufreq: intel_pstate: Read global.no_turbo under READ_ONCE()Rafael J. Wysocki1-6/+6
[ Upstream commit 9558fae8ce97b3b320b387dd7c88309df2c36d4d ] Because global.no_turbo is generally not read under intel_pstate_driver_lock make store_no_turbo() use WRITE_ONCE() for updating it (this is the only place at which it is updated except for the initialization) and make the majority of places reading it use READ_ONCE(). Also remove redundant global.turbo_disabled checks from places that depend on the 'true' value of global.no_turbo because it can only be 'true' if global.turbo_disabled is also 'true'. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Stable-dep-of: 350cbb5d2f67 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Check turbo_is_disabled() in store_no_turbo()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-09-09cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange show_no_turbo() and store_no_turbo()Rafael J. Wysocki1-16/+18
[ Upstream commit c626a438452079824139f97137f17af47b1a8989 ] Now that global.turbo_disabled can only change at the cpufreq driver registration time, initialize global.no_turbo at that time too so they are in sync to start with (if the former is set, the latter cannot be updated later anyway). That allows show_no_turbo() to be simlified because it does not need to check global.turbo_disabled and store_no_turbo() can be rearranged to avoid doing anything if the new value of global.no_turbo is equal to the current one and only return an error on attempts to clear global.no_turbo when global.turbo_disabled. While at it, eliminate the redundant ret variable from store_no_turbo(). No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Stable-dep-of: 350cbb5d2f67 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Check turbo_is_disabled() in store_no_turbo()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-09-09cpufreq: intel_pstate: Unchecked MSR aceess in legacy modeSrinivas Pandruvada1-0/+3
[ Upstream commit ac4e04d9e378f5aa826c2406ad7871ae1b6a6fb9 ] When turbo mode is unavailable on a Skylake-X system, executing the command: # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/no_turbo results in an unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x199 (attempted to write 0x0000000100001300). This issue was reproduced on an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) system and is not a common problem across all Skylake-X systems. This error occurs because the MSR 0x199 Turbo Engage Bit (bit 32) is set when turbo mode is disabled. The issue arises when intel_pstate fails to detect that turbo mode is disabled. Here intel_pstate relies on MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE bit 38 to determine the status of turbo mode. However, on this system, bit 38 is not set even when turbo mode is disabled. According to the Intel Software Developer's Manual (SDM), the BIOS sets this bit during platform initialization to enable or disable opportunistic processor performance operations. Logically, this bit should be set in such cases. However, the SDM also specifies that "OS and applications must use CPUID leaf 06H to detect processors with opportunistic processor performance operations enabled." Therefore, in addition to checking MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE bit 38, verify that CPUID.06H:EAX[1] is 0 to accurately determine if turbo mode is disabled. Fixes: 4521e1a0ce17 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reflect current no_turbo state correctly") Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-09-09cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not update global.turbo_disabled after initializationRafael J. Wysocki1-43/+8
[ Upstream commit 0940f1a8011fd69be5082015068e0dc31c800c20 ] The global.turbo_disabled is updated quite often, especially in the passive mode in which case it is updated every time the scheduler calls into the driver. However, this is generally not necessary and it adds MSR read overhead to scheduler code paths (and that particular MSR is slow to read). For this reason, make the driver read MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_TURBO_DISABLE just once at the cpufreq driver registration time and remove all of the in-flight updates of global.turbo_disabled. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Stable-dep-of: ac4e04d9e378 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Unchecked MSR aceess in legacy mode") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-09-09cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fold intel_pstate_max_within_limits() into callerRafael J. Wysocki1-9/+4
[ Upstream commit 032c5565eb80edb6f2faeb31939540c897987119 ] Fold intel_pstate_max_within_limits() into its only caller. No functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Stable-dep-of: ac4e04d9e378 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Unchecked MSR aceess in legacy mode") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-09-09cpufreq: intel_pstate: Revise global turbo disable checkSrinivas Pandruvada1-5/+1
[ Upstream commit 37b6ddba967c601479bea418a7ac6ff16b6232b7 ] Setting global turbo flag based on CPU 0 P-state limits is problematic as it limits max P-state request on every CPU on the system just based on its P-state limits. There are two cases in which global.turbo_disabled flag is set: - When the MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_TURBO_DISABLE bit is set to 1 in the MSR MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE. This bit can be only changed by the system BIOS before power up. - When the max non turbo P-state is same as max turbo P-state for CPU 0. The second check is not a valid to decide global turbo state based on the CPU 0. CPU 0 max turbo P-state can be same as max non turbo P-state, but for other CPUs this may not be true. There is no guarantee that max P-state limits are same for every CPU. This is possible that during fusing max P-state for a CPU is constrained. Also with the Intel Speed Select performance profile, CPU 0 may not be present in all profiles. In this case the max non turbo and turbo P-state can be set to the lowest possible P-state by the hardware when switched to such profile. Since max non turbo and turbo P-state is same, global.turbo_disabled flag will be set. Once global.turbo_disabled is set, any scaling max and min frequency update for any CPU will result in its max P-state constrained to the max non turbo P-state. Hence remove the check of max non turbo P-state equal to max turbo P-state of CPU 0 to set global turbo disabled flag. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Subject edit ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Stable-dep-of: ac4e04d9e378 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Unchecked MSR aceess in legacy mode") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-08-28cpufreq: Use the fixed and coherent frequency for scaling capacityVincent Guittot1-2/+2
commit 599457ba15403037b489fe536266a3d5f9efaed7 upstream. cpuinfo.max_freq can change at runtime because of boost as an example. This implies that the value could be different from the frequency that has been used to compute the capacity of a CPU. The new arch_scale_freq_ref() returns a fixed and coherent frequency that can be used to compute the capacity for a given frequency. [ Also fix a arch_set_freq_scale() newline style wart in <linux/cpufreq.h>. ] Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211104855.558096-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Stable-dep-of: e37617c8e53a ("sched/fair: Fix frequency selection for non-invariant case") Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-08-28cpufreq: armada-8k: Fix off by one in armada_8k_cpufreq_free_table()Dan Carpenter1-1/+1
commit 4a26df233266a628157d7f0285451d8655defdfc upstream. The freq_tables[] array has num_possible_cpus() elements so, to avoid an out of bounds access, this loop should be capped at "< nb_cpus" instead of "<= nb_cpus". The freq_tables[] array is allocated in armada_8k_cpufreq_init(). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f525a670533d ("cpufreq: ap806: add cpufreq driver for Armada 8K") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-08-28cpufreq: Exit governor when failed to start old governorLifeng Zheng1-3/+5
[ Upstream commit 0ae204405095abfbc2d694ee0fbb49bcbbe55c57 ] Detect the result of starting old governor in cpufreq_set_policy(). If it fails, exit the governor and clear policy->governor. Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709104145.2348017-5-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-08-28cpufreq: CPPC: Mark driver with NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS flagPrashant Malani1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 0a1416a49e63c320f6e6c1c8d07e1b58c0d4a3f3 ] AMU counters on certain CPPC-based platforms tend to yield inaccurate delivered performance measurements on systems that are idle/mostly idle. This results in an inaccurate frequency being stored by cpufreq in its policy structure when the CPU is brought online. [1] Consequently, if the userspace governor tries to set the frequency to a new value, there is a possibility that it would be the erroneous value stored earlier. In such a scenario, cpufreq would assume that the requested frequency has already been set and return early, resulting in the correct/new frequency request never making it to the hardware. Since the operating frequency is liable to this sort of inconsistency, mark the CPPC driver with CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS so that it is always invoked when a target frequency update is requested. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250619000925.415528-3-pmalani@google.com/ [1] Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@google.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250722055611.130574-2-pmalani@google.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-08-15cpufreq: Init policy->rwsem before it may be possibly usedLifeng Zheng1-1/+2
[ Upstream commit d1378d1d7edb3a4c4935a44fe834ae135be03564 ] In cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(), policy->rwsem is used. But in cpufreq_policy_alloc(), if freq_qos_add_notifier() returns an error, error path via err_kobj_remove or err_min_qos_notifier will be reached and cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() will be called before policy->rwsem is initialized. Thus, the calling of init_rwsem() should be moved to where before these two error paths can be reached. Fixes: 67d874c3b2c6 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework") Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709104145.2348017-3-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-08-15cpufreq: Initialize cpufreq-based frequency-invariance laterLifeng Zheng1-9/+9
[ Upstream commit 2a6c727387062a2ea79eb6cf5004820cb1b0afe2 ] The cpufreq-based invariance is enabled in cpufreq_register_driver(), but never disabled after registration fails. Move the invariance initialization to where all other initializations have been successfully done to solve this problem. Fixes: 874f63531064 ("cpufreq: report whether cpufreq supports Frequency Invariance (FI)") Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709104145.2348017-2-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com [ rjw: New subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-08-15cpufreq: intel_pstate: Always use HWP_DESIRED_PERF in passive modeRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+2
[ Upstream commit 1cefe495cacba5fb0417da3a75a1a76e3546d176 ] In the passive mode, intel_cpufreq_update_pstate() sets HWP_MIN_PERF in accordance with the target frequency to ensure delivering adequate performance, but it sets HWP_DESIRED_PERF to 0, so the processor has no indication that the desired performance level is actually equal to the floor one. This may cause it to choose a performance point way above the desired level. Moreover, this is inconsistent with intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf() which actually sets HWP_DESIRED_PERF in accordance with the target performance value. Address this by adjusting intel_cpufreq_update_pstate() to pass target_pstate as both the minimum and the desired performance levels to intel_cpufreq_hwp_update(). Fixes: a365ab6b9dfb ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback") Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Shashank Balaji <shashank.mahadasyam@sony.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/6173276.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-06-27Revert "cpufreq: tegra186: Share policy per cluster"Jon Hunter1-7/+0
This reverts commit ac64f0e893ff370c4d3426c83c1bd0acae75bcf4 which is upstream commit be4ae8c19492cd6d5de61ccb34ffb3f5ede5eec8. This commit is causing a suspend regression on Tegra186 Jetson TX2 with Linux v6.12.y kernels. This is not seen with Linux v6.15 that includes this change but indicates that there are there changes missing. Therefore, revert this change. Fixes: ac64f0e893ff ("cpufreq: tegra186: Share policy per cluster") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/bf1dabf7-0337-40e9-8b8e-4e93a0ffd4cc@nvidia.com/ Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-06-27cpufreq: scmi: Skip SCMI devices that aren't used by the CPUsMike Tipton1-1/+35
[ Upstream commit 6c9bb86922728c7a4cceb99f131e00dd87514f20 ] Currently, all SCMI devices with performance domains attempt to register a cpufreq driver, even if their performance domains aren't used to control the CPUs. The cpufreq framework only supports registering a single driver, so only the first device will succeed. And if that device isn't used for the CPUs, then cpufreq will scale the wrong domains. To avoid this, return early from scmi_cpufreq_probe() if the probing SCMI device isn't referenced by the CPU device phandles. This keeps the existing assumption that all CPUs are controlled by a single SCMI device. Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-06-19acpi-cpufreq: Fix nominal_freq units to KHz in get_max_boost_ratio()Gautham R. Shenoy1-1/+1
commit cb6a85f38f456b086c366e346ebb67ffa70c7243 upstream. commit 083466754596 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation") modified get_max_boost_ratio() to return the nominal_freq advertised in the _CPC object. This was for the purposes of computing the maximum frequency. The frequencies advertised in _CPC objects are in MHz. However, cpufreq expects the frequency to be in KHz. Since the nominal_freq returned by get_max_boost_ratio() was not in KHz but instead in MHz,the cpuinfo_max_frequency that was computed using this nominal_freq was incorrect and an invalid value which resulted in cpufreq reporting the P0 frequency as the cpuinfo_max_freq. Fix this by converting the nominal_freq to KHz before returning the same from get_max_boost_ratio(). Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aDaB63tDvbdcV0cg@HQ-GR2X1W2P57/ Fixes: 083466754596 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation") Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14+ Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250529085143.709-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-06-04cpufreq: tegra186: Share policy per clusterAaron Kling1-0/+7
[ Upstream commit be4ae8c19492cd6d5de61ccb34ffb3f5ede5eec8 ] This functionally brings tegra186 in line with tegra210 and tegra194, sharing a cpufreq policy between all cores in a cluster. Reviewed-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-06-04cpufreq: Add SM8650 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blocklistPengyu Luo1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit fc5414a4774e14e51a93499a6adfdc45f2de82e0 ] SM8650 have already been supported by qcom-cpufreq-hw driver, but never been added to cpufreq-dt-platdev. This makes noise [ 0.388525] cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: failed register driver: -17 [ 0.388537] cpufreq-dt cpufreq-dt: probe with driver cpufreq-dt failed with error -17 So adding it to the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver's blocklist to fix it. Signed-off-by: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-05-09cpufreq: Fix setting policy limits when frequency tables are usedRafael J. Wysocki3-12/+19
commit b79028039f440e7d2c4df6ab243060c4e3803e84 upstream. Commit 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max") overlooked the fact that policy->min and policy->max were accessed directly in cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and in the functions called by it. Consequently, the changes made by that commit led to problems with setting policy limits. Address this by passing the target frequency limits to __resolve_freq() and cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and propagating them to the functions called by the latter. Fixes: 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max") Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/aAplED3IA_J0eZN0@linaro.org/ Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5896780.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-05-09cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->maxRafael J. Wysocki1-7/+25
commit 7491cdf46b5cbdf123fc84fbe0a07e9e3d7b7620 upstream. Since cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() can run in parallel with cpufreq_set_policy() and there is no synchronization between them, the former may access policy->min and policy->max while the latter is updating them and it may see intermediate values of them due to the way the update is carried out. Also the compiler is free to apply any optimizations it wants both to the stores in cpufreq_set_policy() and to the loads in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() which may result in additional inconsistencies. To address this, use WRITE_ONCE() when updating policy->min and policy->max in cpufreq_set_policy() and use READ_ONCE() for reading them in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(). Moreover, rearrange the update in cpufreq_set_policy() to avoid storing intermediate values in policy->min and policy->max with the help of the observation that their new values are expected to be properly ordered upfront. Also modify cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() to take the possible reverse ordering of policy->min and policy->max, which may happen depending on the ordering of operations when this function and cpufreq_set_policy() run concurrently, into account by always honoring the max when it turns out to be less than the min (in case it comes from thermal throttling or similar). Fixes: 151717690694 ("cpufreq: Make policy min/max hard requirements") Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5907080.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-05-02cpufreq: cppc: Fix invalid return value in .get() callbackMarc Zyngier1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit 2b8e6b58889c672e1ae3601d9b2b070be4dc2fbc ] Returning a negative error code in a function with an unsigned return type is a pretty bad idea. It is probably worse when the justification for the change is "our static analisys tool found it". Fixes: cf7de25878a1 ("cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-05-02cpufreq: scpi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scpi_cpufreq_get_rate()Henry Martin1-3/+10
[ Upstream commit 73b24dc731731edf762f9454552cb3a5b7224949 ] cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present in the policy->cpus mask. scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference. Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency") Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-05-02cpufreq: scmi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scmi_cpufreq_get_rate()Henry Martin1-2/+8
[ Upstream commit 484d3f15cc6cbaa52541d6259778e715b2c83c54 ] cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present in the policy->cpus mask. scmi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference. Add NULL check after cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() to prevent this issue. Fixes: 99d6bdf33877 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol") Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-05-02cpufreq: apple-soc: Fix null-ptr-deref in apple_soc_cpufreq_get_rate()Henry Martin1-2/+8
[ Upstream commit 9992649f6786921873a9b89dafa5e04d8c5fef2b ] cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present in the policy->cpus mask. apple_soc_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference. Fixes: 6286bbb40576 ("cpufreq: apple-soc: Add new driver to control Apple SoC CPU P-states") Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-04-25cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits()Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+8
commit 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 upstream. Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net [do not use __free(cpufreq_cpu_put) in a backport] Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-04-10cpufreq: governor: Fix negative 'idle_time' handling in dbs_update()Jie Zhan1-22/+23
[ Upstream commit 3698dd6b139dc37b35a9ad83d9330c1f99666c02 ] We observed an issue that the CPU frequency can't raise up with a 100% CPU load when NOHZ is off and the 'conservative' governor is selected. 'idle_time' can be negative if it's obtained from get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy() when NOHZ is off. This was found and explained in commit 9485e4ca0b48 ("cpufreq: governor: Fix handling of special cases in dbs_update()"). However, commit 7592019634f8 ("cpufreq: governors: Fix long idle detection logic in load calculation") introduced a comparison between 'idle_time' and 'samling_rate' to detect a long idle interval. While 'idle_time' is converted to int before comparison, it's actually promoted to unsigned again when compared with an unsigned 'sampling_rate'. Hence, this leads to wrong idle interval detection when it's in fact 100% busy and sets policy_dbs->idle_periods to a very large value. 'conservative' adjusts the frequency to minimum because of the large 'idle_periods', such that the frequency can't raise up. 'Ondemand' doesn't use policy_dbs->idle_periods so it fortunately avoids the issue. Correct negative 'idle_time' to 0 before any use of it in dbs_update(). Fixes: 7592019634f8 ("cpufreq: governors: Fix long idle detection logic in load calculation") Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250213035510.2402076-1-zhanjie9@hisilicon.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-04-10cpufreq: scpi: compare kHz instead of Hzzuoqian1-2/+3
[ Upstream commit 4742da9774a416908ef8e3916164192c15c0e2d1 ] The CPU rate from clk_get_rate() may not be divisible by 1000 (e.g., 133333333). But the rate calculated from frequency(kHz) is always divisible by 1000 (e.g., 133333000). Comparing the rate causes a warning during CPU scaling: "cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -5". When we choose to compare kHz here, the issue does not occur. Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency") Signed-off-by: zuoqian <zuoqian113@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-27cpufreq: fix using cpufreq-dt as moduleAndreas Kemnade2-3/+1
[ Upstream commit f1f010c9d9c62c865d9f54e94075800ba764b4d9 ] This driver can be built as a module since commit 3b062a086984 ("cpufreq: dt-platdev: Support building as module"), but unfortunately this caused a regression because the cputfreq-dt-platdev.ko module does not autoload. Usually, this is solved by just using the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() macro to export all the device IDs as module aliases. But this driver is special due how matches with devices and decides what platform supports. There are two of_device_id lists, an allow list that are for CPU devices that always match and a deny list that's for devices that must not match. The driver registers a cpufreq-dt platform device for all the CPU device nodes that either are in the allow list or contain an operating-points-v2 property and are not in the deny list. Enforce builtin compile of cpufreq-dt-platdev to make autoload work. Fixes: 3b062a086984 ("cpufreq: dt-platdev: Support building as module") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241104201424.2a42efdd@akair/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241119111918.1732531-1-javierm@redhat.com/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> Reported-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com> Reported-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> [ Viresh: Picked commit log from Javier, updated tags ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-27cpufreq: dt-platdev: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macroJeff Johnson1-0/+1
[ Upstream commit 64e018d7a8990c11734704a0767c47fd8efd5388 ] make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.o Add the missing invocation of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Stable-dep-of: f1f010c9d9c6 ("cpufreq: fix using cpufreq-dt as module") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-17cpufreq: s3c64xx: Fix compilation warningViresh Kumar1-4/+7
commit 43855ac61483cb914f060851535ea753c094b3e0 upstream. The driver generates following warning when regulator support isn't enabled in the kernel. Fix it. drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c: In function 's3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target': >> drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:55:22: warning: variable 'old_freq' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 55 | unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; | ^~~~~~~~ >> drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:54:30: warning: variable 'dvfs' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 54 | struct s3c64xx_dvfs *dvfs; | ^~~~ Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501191803.CtfT7b2o-lkp@intel.com/ Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+ Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/236b227e929e5adc04d1e9e7af6845a46c8e9432.1737525916.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-02-08cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computationGautham R. Shenoy1-9/+27
[ Upstream commit 0834667545962ef1c5e8684ed32b45d9c574acd3 ] Commit 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies") introduced an assumption in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init() that the first entry in the P-state table was the nominal frequency. This assumption is incorrect. The frequency corresponding to the P0 P-State need not be the same as the nominal frequency advertised via CPPC. Since the driver is using the CPPC.highest_perf and CPPC.nominal_perf to compute the boost-ratio, it makes sense to use CPPC.nominal_freq to compute the max-frequency. CPPC.nominal_freq is advertised on platforms supporting CPPC revisions 3 or higher. Hence, fallback to using the first entry in the P-State table only on platforms that do not advertise CPPC.nominal_freq. Fixes: 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies") Tested-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113044107.566-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com [ rjw: Retain reverse X-mas tree ordering of local variable declarations ] [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08cpufreq: qcom: Implement clk_ops::determine_rate() for qcom_cpufreq* clocksManivannan Sadhasivam1-0/+13
[ Upstream commit a9ba290d0b829012574b6821ba08815046e60c94 ] determine_rate() callback is used by the clk_set_rate() API to get the closest rate of the target rate supported by the clock. If this callback is not implemented (nor round_rate() callback), then the API will assume that the clock cannot set the requested rate. And since there is no parent, it will return -EINVAL. This is not an issue right now as clk_set_rate() mistakenly compares the target rate with cached rate and bails out early. But once that is fixed to compare the target rate with the actual rate of the clock (returned by recalc_rate()), then clk_set_rate() for this clock will start to fail as below: cpu cpu0: _opp_config_clk_single: failed to set clock rate: -22 So implement the determine_rate() callback that just returns the actual rate at which the clock is passed to the CPUs in a domain. Fixes: 4370232c727b ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support") Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-08cpufreq: qcom: Fix qcom_cpufreq_hw_recalc_rate() to query LUT if LMh IRQ is ↵Manivannan Sadhasivam1-10/+11
not available [ Upstream commit 85d8b11351a8f15d6ec7a5e97909861cb3b6bcec ] Currently, qcom_cpufreq_hw_recalc_rate() returns the LMh throttled frequency for the domain even if LMh IRQ is not available. But as per qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(), the driver has to query LUT entries to get the actual frequency of the domain. So do the same in qcom_cpufreq_hw_recalc_rate(). While doing so, refactor the existing qcom_cpufreq_hw_get() function so that qcom_cpufreq_hw_recalc_rate() can make use of the existing code and avoid code duplication. This also requires setting the qcom_cpufreq_data::policy even if LMh IRQ is not available. Fixes: 4370232c727b ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support") Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-02-01cpufreq: amd-pstate: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return valueAnastasia Belova1-1/+6
commit 5493f9714e4cdaf0ee7cec15899a231400cb1a9f upstream. cpufreq_cpu_get may return NULL. To avoid NULL-dereference check it and return in case of error. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@astralinux.ru> Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ Raj: on 6.6, there don't have function amd_pstate_update_limits() so applied the NULL checking in amd_pstate_adjust_perf() only ] Signed-off-by: Rajani Kantha <rajanikantha@engineer.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-12-09cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Fix wrong return value in mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power()Jinjie Ruan1-1/+1
commit 172bf5ed04cb6c9e66d58de003938ed5c8756570 upstream. mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in em_create_perf_table(), the later zero check for power is not invalid as power is uninitialized. As Lukasz suggested, it must return -EINVAL when the 'policy' is not found. So return -EINVAL to fix it. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 4855e26bcf4d ("cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW") Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Suggested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-12-09cpufreq: CPPC: Fix wrong return value in cppc_get_cpu_power()Jinjie Ruan1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit b51eb0874d8170028434fbd259e80b78ed9b8eca ] cppc_get_cpu_power() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in em_create_perf_table(), the later zero check for power is not valid as power is uninitialized. As Quentin pointed out, kernel energy model core check the return value of active_power() first, so if the callback failed it should tell the core. So return -EINVAL to fix it. Fixes: a78e72075642 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cpufreq_cpu_get_raw()") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-12-09cpufreq: CPPC: Fix wrong return value in cppc_get_cpu_cost()Jinjie Ruan1-1/+1
[ Upstream commit be392aa80f1e5b0b65ccc2a540b9304fefcfe3d8 ] cppc_get_cpu_cost() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in em_compute_costs(), the later zero check for cost is not valid as cost is uninitialized. As Quentin pointed out, kernel energy model core check the return value of get_cost() first, so if the callback failed it should tell the core. Return -EINVAL to fix it. Fixes: 1a1374bb8c59 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cppc_get_cpu_cost()") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c4765377-7830-44c2-84fa-706b6e304e10@stanley.mountain/ Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-12-09cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cppc_get_cpu_cost()Jinjie Ruan1-0/+3
[ Upstream commit 1a1374bb8c5926674973d849feed500bc61ad535 ] cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() may return NULL if the cpu is not in policy->cpus cpu mask and it will cause null pointer dereference, so check NULL for cppc_get_cpu_cost(). Fixes: 740fcdc2c20e ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>