summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2005-10-28[PATCH] cpufreq: SMP fix for conservative governorDave Jones1-3/+3
Don't try to access not-present CPUs. Conservative governor will always oops on SMP without this fix. Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-01[CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative governor idle_tick clean-upDave Jones1-21/+5
[PATCH] [3/5] ondemand,conservative governor idle_tick clean-up Ondemand and conservative governor clean-up, it factorises the idle ticks measurement. Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-06-01[CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative governor store the idle ticks for all cpusDave Jones1-1/+7
[PATCH] [2/5] ondemand,conservative governor store the idle ticks for all cpus Ondemand, conservative governor did not store prev_cpu_idle_up into prev_cpu_idle_down for other CPUs than the current CPU. Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-06-01[CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanupDave Jones1-35/+18
[PATCH] [1/5] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanup Attached patch fixes some minor issues with Alexander's patch and related cleanup in both ondemand and conservative governor. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-06-01[CPUFREQ] Conservative cpufreq governerDave Jones1-0/+613
A new cpufreq module, based on the ondemand one with my additional patches just posted. This one is more suitable for battery environments where its probably more appealing to have the cpu freq gracefully increase and decrease rather than flip between the min and max freq's. N.B. Bruno Ducrot pointed out that the amd64's "do have unacceptable latency between min and max freq transition, due to the step-by-step requirements (200MHz IIRC)"; so AMD64 users would probably benefit from this too. Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>