summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-09-13cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interfaceAl Stone1-4/+49
When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when it should be 1.8GHz). The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed. This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only one such record regardless. Since CPPC is relatively new, it is unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort of relative performance of processors of differing speeds. (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly. For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches will be considered in the future. This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with and without CPPC support. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-09ACPI / CPPC: Add prefix cppc to cpudata structure nameSrinivas Pandruvada1-7/+7
Since struct cpudata is defined in a header file, add prefix cppc_ to make it not a generic name. Otherwise it causes compile issue in locally define structure with the same name. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-08-31ACPI / CPPC: set a non-zero value for transition_latencyPrakash, Prashanth1-0/+1
Compute the expected transition latency for frequency transitions using the values from the PCCT tables when the desired perf register is in PCC. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-04-25cpufreq: ACPI / CPPC: Add module support for cppc_cpufreq driverAshwin Chaugule1-0/+21
Add a function to cleanup at module exit and export appropriate GPL string to enable moduler support for the cppc_cpufreq driver. Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-24cpufreq: CPPC: Initialize and check CPUFreq CPU co-ord type correctlyAshwin Chaugule1-1/+2
The CPU policy struct indicates the co-ordination type for all CPUs of a common freq domain. Initialize it correctly using the CPU specific data gathered from CPPC ACPI lib via acpi_get_psd_map(). The PSD object is optional, so the cpu->shared_type can also be 0. So instead of assuming any value other than SW_ANY(0xFD) is unsupported, explictly check if shared_type is SW_ALL and then bail. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-11-07cpufreq: CPPC: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call kfree()Markus Elfring1-2/+1
The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-13ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPCAshwin Chaugule1-0/+176
This driver utilizes the methods introduced in a previous patch titled - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors. Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>