summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/base/power/qos.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2017-10-31Revert "PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency PM QoS"Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
This reverts commit 0cc2b4e5a020 (PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency PM QoS) as it introduced regressions on multiple systems and the fix-up in commit 2a9a86d5c813 (PM / QoS: Fix default runtime_pm device resume latency) does not address all of them. The original problem that commit 0cc2b4e5a020 was attempting to fix will be addressed later. Fixes: 0cc2b4e5a020 (PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency PM QoS) Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-10-24PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency PM QoSRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
The special value of 0 for device resume latency PM QoS means "no restriction", but there are two problems with that. First, device resume latency PM QoS requests with 0 as the value are always put in front of requests with positive values in the priority lists used internally by the PM QoS framework, causing 0 to be chosen as an effective constraint value. However, that 0 is then interpreted as "no restriction" effectively overriding the other requests with specific restrictions which is incorrect. Second, the users of device resume latency PM QoS have no way to specify that *any* resume latency at all should be avoided, which is an artificial limitation in general. To address these issues, modify device resume latency PM QoS to use S32_MAX as the "no constraint" value and 0 as the "no latency at all" one and rework its users (the cpuidle menu governor, the genpd QoS governor and the runtime PM framework) to follow these changes. Also add a special "n/a" value to the corresponding user space I/F to allow user space to indicate that it cannot accept any resume latencies at all for the given device. Fixes: 85dc0b8a4019 (PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraints) Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197323 Reported-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Tested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
2017-09-18PM / QoS: Use the correct variable to check the QoS request typeJan H. Schönherr1-5/+5
Use the actual function argument for the validation of the request type, instead of the type field in a fresh (supposedly zero-initialized) request structure. Signed-off-by: Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@amazon.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-03-03Merge branches 'pm-cpuidle', 'pm-cpufreq' and 'pm-sleep'Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+1
* pm-cpuidle: intel_idle: stop exposing platform acronyms in sysfs cpuidle: menu: Avoid taking spinlock for accessing QoS values * pm-cpufreq: cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix limits issue with operation mode switching cpufreq: qoriq: clean up unused code * pm-sleep: PM / hibernate: Define pr_fmt() and use pr_*() instead of printk() PM / hibernate: Untangle power_down()
2017-02-27cpuidle: menu: Avoid taking spinlock for accessing QoS valuesRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+1
After commit 9908859acaa9 (cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration) the cpuidle menu governor calls dev_pm_qos_read_value() on CPU devices to read the current resume latency QoS constraint values for them. That function takes a spinlock to prevent the device's power.qos pointer from becoming NULL during the access which is a problem for the RT patchset where spinlocks are converted into mutexes and the idle loop stops working. However, it is not even necessary for the menu governor to take that spinlock, because the power.qos pointer accessed under it cannot be modified during the access anyway. For this reason, introduce a "raw" routine for accessing device QoS resume latency constraints without locking and use it in the menu governor. Fixes: 9908859acaa9 (cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration) Acked-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-24PM / QoS: Remove global notifiersViresh Kumar1-46/+4
They were never used in the kernel, so get rid of them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-02-18PM / QoS: Fix memory leak on resume_latency.notifiersJohn Keeping1-1/+1
Since commit 2d984ad132a8 (PM / QoS: Introcuce latency tolerance device PM QoS type) we reassign "c" to point at qos->latency_tolerance before freeing c->notifiers, but the notifiers field of latency_tolerance is never used. Restore the original behaviour of freeing the notifiers pointer on qos->resume_latency, which is used, and fix the following kmemleak warning. unreferenced object 0xed9dba00 (size 64): comm "kworker/0:1", pid 36, jiffies 4294670128 (age 15202.983s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 04 ba 9d ed 04 ba 9d ed 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<c06f6084>] kmemleak_alloc+0x74/0xb8 [<c011c964>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x170/0x25c [<c035f448>] dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate+0x3c/0xe4 [<c035f574>] __dev_pm_qos_add_request+0x84/0x1a0 [<c035f6cc>] dev_pm_qos_add_request+0x3c/0x54 [<c03c3fc4>] usb_hub_create_port_device+0x110/0x2b8 [<c03b2a60>] hub_probe+0xadc/0xc80 [<c03bb050>] usb_probe_interface+0x1b4/0x260 [<c035773c>] driver_probe_device+0x198/0x40c [<c0357b14>] __device_attach_driver+0x8c/0x98 [<c0355bbc>] bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0x9c [<c0357494>] __device_attach+0x98/0x138 [<c0357c64>] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x18 [<c03569dc>] bus_probe_device+0x30/0x88 [<c0354c54>] device_add+0x430/0x554 [<c03b92d8>] usb_set_configuration+0x660/0x6fc Fixes: 2d984ad132a8 (PM / QoS: Introcuce latency tolerance device PM QoS type) Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01PM / QoS: Export dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_toleranceAndrew Lutomirski1-0/+1
nvme wants a module parameter that overrides the default latency tolerance. This makes it easy for nvme to reflect that default in sysfs. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-12-01PM / QoS: Fix writing 'auto' to pm_qos_latency_tolerance_usAndrew Lutomirski1-1/+4
If it was already 'auto', then writing 'auto' again would incorrectly fail. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-28PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose device latency tolerance to userspaceMika Westerberg1-0/+37
Typically when a device is created the bus core it belongs to (for example PCI) does not know if the device supports things like latency tolerance. This is left to the driver that binds to the device in question. However, at that time the device has already been created and there is no way to set its dev->power.set_latency_tolerance anymore. So follow what has been done for other PM QoS attributes as well and allow drivers to expose and hide latency tolerance from userspace, if the device supports it. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2015-01-24PM / QoS: Use lockdep asserts to find missing hold of power.lockKrzysztof Kozlowski1-0/+4
Add lockdep asserts for holding the dev->power.lock to non-static functions which require this. They could be used outside of the file so asserts may help in detecting locking misuse. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-12-04PM: Drop CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME from the driver coreRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+0
After commit b2b49ccbdd54 (PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is selected) PM_RUNTIME is always set if PM is set, so quite a few depend on CONFIG_PM or even may be dropped entirely in some cases. Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM in the PM core code. Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-11PM / QoS: Add type to dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() argumentsRafael J. Wysocki1-5/+17
Rework dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() so that device PM QoS type is passed to it as the third argument and make it support the DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE device PM QoS type (in addition to DEV_PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY). That will allow the drivers of devices without latency tolerance hardware support to use their ancestors having it as proxies for their latency tolerance requirements. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-11PM / QoS: Introcuce latency tolerance device PM QoS typeRafael J. Wysocki1-22/+122
Add a new latency tolerance device PM QoS type to be use for specifying active state (RPM_ACTIVE) memory access (DMA) latency tolerance requirements for devices. It may be used to prevent hardware from choosing overly aggressive energy-saving operation modes (causing too much latency to appear) for the whole platform. This feature reqiures hardware support, so it only will be available for devices having a new .set_latency_tolerance() callback in struct dev_pm_info populated, in which case the routine pointed to by it should implement whatever is necessary to transfer the effective requirement value to the hardware. Whenever the effective latency tolerance changes for the device, its .set_latency_tolerance() callback will be executed and the effective value will be passed to it. If that value is negative, which means that the list of latency tolerance requirements for the device is empty, the callback is expected to switch the underlying hardware latency tolerance control mechanism to an autonomous mode if available. If that value is PM_QOS_LATENCY_ANY, in turn, and the hardware supports a special "no requirement" setting, the callback is expected to use it. That allows software to prevent the hardware from automatically updating the device's latency tolerance in response to its power state changes (e.g. during transitions from D3cold to D0), which generally may be done in the autonomous latency tolerance control mode. If .set_latency_tolerance() is present for the device, a new pm_qos_latency_tolerance_us attribute will be present in the devivce's power directory in sysfs. Then, user space can use that attribute to specify its latency tolerance requirement for the device, if any. Writing "any" to it means "no requirement, but do not let the hardware control latency tolerance" and writing "auto" to it allows the hardware to be switched to the autonomous mode if there are no other requirements from the kernel side in the device's list. This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-11PM / QoS: Add no_constraints_value field to struct pm_qos_constraintsRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+1
Add a new field, no_constraints_value, to struct pm_qos_constraints representing a list of PM QoS constraint requests to be returned by pm_qos_get_value() when that list of requests is empty. That field will be equal to default_value for all of the existing global PM QoS classes and for the resume latency device PM QoS type, but it will be different from default_value for the new latency tolerance device PM QoS type introduced by the next changeset. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-02-11PM / QoS: Rename device resume latency QoS itemsRafael J. Wysocki1-28/+27
Rename symbols, variables, functions and structure fields related do the resume latency device PM QoS type so that it is clear where they belong (in particular, to avoid confusion with the latency tolerance device PM QoS type introduced by a subsequent changeset). Update the PM QoS documentation to better reflect its current state. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-24PM / QoS: Add dev_pm_qos_request tracepointsSahara1-0/+6
Adds tracepoints to dev_pm_qos_add_request, dev_pm_qos_update_request, and dev_pm_qos_remove_request. It's useful for checking device name, dev_pm_qos_request_type, and value. Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-04-02PM / QoS: Avoid possible deadlock related to sysfs accessRafael J. Wysocki1-13/+47
Commit b81ea1b (PM / QoS: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks in device PM QoS) put calls to pm_qos_sysfs_add_latency(), pm_qos_sysfs_add_flags(), pm_qos_sysfs_remove_latency(), and pm_qos_sysfs_remove_flags() under dev_pm_qos_mtx, which was a mistake, because it may lead to deadlocks in some situations. For example, if pm_qos_remote_wakeup_store() is run in parallel with dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(), they may deadlock in the following way: ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.9.0-rc4-next-20130328-sasha-00014-g91a3267 #319 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------------- trinity-child6/12371 is trying to acquire lock: (s_active#54){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81301631>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x60 but task is already holding lock: (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81f07cc3>] dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy+0x23/0x250 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.+.}: [<ffffffff811811da>] lock_acquire+0x1aa/0x240 [<ffffffff83dab809>] __mutex_lock_common+0x59/0x5e0 [<ffffffff83dabebf>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff81f07f2f>] dev_pm_qos_update_flags+0x3f/0xc0 [<ffffffff81f05f4f>] pm_qos_remote_wakeup_store+0x3f/0x70 [<ffffffff81efbb43>] dev_attr_store+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffff812ffdaa>] sysfs_write_file+0xfa/0x150 [<ffffffff8127f2c1>] __kernel_write+0x81/0x150 [<ffffffff812afc2d>] write_pipe_buf+0x4d/0x80 [<ffffffff812af57c>] splice_from_pipe_feed+0x7c/0x120 [<ffffffff812afa25>] __splice_from_pipe+0x45/0x80 [<ffffffff812b14fc>] splice_from_pipe+0x4c/0x70 [<ffffffff812b1538>] default_file_splice_write+0x18/0x30 [<ffffffff812afae3>] do_splice_from+0x83/0xb0 [<ffffffff812afb2e>] direct_splice_actor+0x1e/0x20 [<ffffffff812b0277>] splice_direct_to_actor+0xe7/0x200 [<ffffffff812b15bc>] do_splice_direct+0x4c/0x70 [<ffffffff8127eda9>] do_sendfile+0x169/0x300 [<ffffffff8127ff94>] SyS_sendfile64+0x64/0xb0 [<ffffffff83db7d18>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6 -> #0 (s_active#54){++++.+}: [<ffffffff811800cf>] __lock_acquire+0x15bf/0x1e50 [<ffffffff811811da>] lock_acquire+0x1aa/0x240 [<ffffffff81300aa2>] sysfs_deactivate+0x122/0x1a0 [<ffffffff81301631>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x60 [<ffffffff812ff77f>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x7f/0xb0 [<ffffffff813035a1>] sysfs_unmerge_group+0x51/0x70 [<ffffffff81f068f4>] pm_qos_sysfs_remove_flags+0x14/0x20 [<ffffffff81f07490>] __dev_pm_qos_hide_flags+0x30/0x70 [<ffffffff81f07cd5>] dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy+0x35/0x250 [<ffffffff81f06931>] dpm_sysfs_remove+0x11/0x50 [<ffffffff81efcf6f>] device_del+0x3f/0x1b0 [<ffffffff81efd128>] device_unregister+0x48/0x60 [<ffffffff82d4083c>] usb_hub_remove_port_device+0x1c/0x20 [<ffffffff82d2a9cd>] hub_disconnect+0xdd/0x160 [<ffffffff82d36ab7>] usb_unbind_interface+0x67/0x170 [<ffffffff81f001a7>] __device_release_driver+0x87/0xe0 [<ffffffff81f00559>] device_release_driver+0x29/0x40 [<ffffffff81effc58>] bus_remove_device+0x148/0x160 [<ffffffff81efd07f>] device_del+0x14f/0x1b0 [<ffffffff82d344f9>] usb_disable_device+0xf9/0x280 [<ffffffff82d34ff8>] usb_set_configuration+0x268/0x840 [<ffffffff82d3a7fc>] usb_remove_store+0x4c/0x80 [<ffffffff81efbb43>] dev_attr_store+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffff812ffdaa>] sysfs_write_file+0xfa/0x150 [<ffffffff8127f71d>] do_loop_readv_writev+0x4d/0x90 [<ffffffff8127f999>] do_readv_writev+0xf9/0x1e0 [<ffffffff8127faba>] vfs_writev+0x3a/0x60 [<ffffffff8127fc60>] SyS_writev+0x50/0xd0 [<ffffffff83db7d18>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(dev_pm_qos_mtx); lock(s_active#54); lock(dev_pm_qos_mtx); lock(s_active#54); *** DEADLOCK *** To avoid that, remove the calls to functions mentioned above from under dev_pm_qos_mtx and introduce a separate lock to prevent races between functions that add or remove device PM QoS sysfs attributes from happening. Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-04PM / QoS: Remove device PM QoS sysfs attributes at the right placeRafael J. Wysocki1-68/+52
Device PM QoS sysfs attributes, if present during device removal, are removed from within device_pm_remove(), which is too late, since dpm_sysfs_remove() has already removed the whole attribute group they belonged to. However, moving the removal of those attributes to dpm_sysfs_remove() alone is not sufficient, because in theory they still can be re-added right after being removed by it (the device's driver is still bound to it at that point). For this reason, move the entire desctruction of device PM QoS constraints to dpm_sysfs_remove() and make it prevent any new constraints from being added after it has run. Also, move the initialization of the power.qos field in struct device to device_pm_init_common() and drop the no longer needed dev_pm_qos_constraints_init(). Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-04PM / QoS: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks in device PM QoSRafael J. Wysocki1-42/+87
The current device PM QoS code assumes that certain functions will never be called in parallel with each other (for example, it is assumed that dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() won't be called in parallel with dev_pm_qos_hide_flags() for the same device and analogously for the latency limit), which may be overly optimistic. Moreover, dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit() leak memory in error code paths (req needs to be freed on errors) and __dev_pm_qos_drop_user_request() forgets to free the request. To fix the above issues put more things under the device PM QoS mutex to make them mutually exclusive and add the missing freeing of memory. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-01-25PM/Qos: Expose dev_pm_qos_flags symbolLan Tianyu1-0/+1
The dev_pm_qos_flags() will be used in the usb core which could be compiled as a module. This patch is to export it. Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-01-06PM / QoS: Rename local variable in dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request()Rafael J. Wysocki1-5/+5
Local variable 'error' in dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() need not contain error codes only, so rename it to 'ret'. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-30Merge branch 'pm-qos'Rafael J. Wysocki1-65/+256
* pm-qos: PM / QoS: Handle device PM QoS flags while removing constraints PM / QoS: Resume device before exposing/hiding PM QoS flags PM / QoS: Document request manipulation requirement for flags PM / QoS: Fix a free error in the dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy() PM / QoS: Fix the return value of dev_pm_qos_update_request() PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account PM / Domains: Check device PM QoS flags in pm_genpd_poweroff() PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space PM / QoS: Introduce PM QoS device flags support PM / QoS: Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for more request types PM / QoS: Introduce request and constraint data types for PM QoS flags PM / QoS: Prepare device structure for adding more constraint types
2012-11-24PM / QoS: Handle device PM QoS flags while removing constraintsRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+10
PM QoS flags have to be handled by dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy() in the same way as PM QoS resume latency constraints. That is, if they have been exposed to user space, they have to be hidden from it and the list of flags requests has to be flushed before destroying the device's PM QoS object. Make that happen. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-23PM / QoS: fix wrong error-checking conditionGuennadi Liakhovetski1-1/+1
dev_pm_qos_add_request() can return 0, 1, or a negative error code, therefore the correct error test is "if (error < 0)." Checking just for non-zero return code leads to erroneous setting of the req->dev pointer to NULL, which then leads to a repeated call to dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() in st1232_ts_irq_handler(). This in turn leads to an Oops, when the I2C host adapter is unloaded and reloaded again because of the inconsistent state of its QoS request list. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-11PM / QoS: Resume device before exposing/hiding PM QoS flagsLan Tianyu1-1/+6
Since dev_pm_qos_add_request(), dev_pm_qos_update_request() and dev_pm_qos_remove_request() for PM QoS flags should not be invoked when device in RPM_SUSPENDED, add pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put() around these functions in dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and dev_pm_qos_hide_flags(). [rjw: Modified the subject and changelog to better reflect the code changes made.] Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-02PM / QoS: Document request manipulation requirement for flagsRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+9
In fact, the callers of dev_pm_qos_add_request(), dev_pm_qos_update_request() and dev_pm_qos_remove_request() for requests of type DEV_PM_QOS_FLAGS need to ensure that the target device is not RPM_SUSPENDED before using any of these functions (or be prepared for the new PM QoS flags to take effect after the device has been resumed). Document this in their kerneldoc comments. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-02PM / QoS: Fix a free error in the dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy()Lan,Tianyu1-1/+1
Free a wrong point to struct dev_pm_qos->latency which suppose to be the point to struct dev_pm_qos. The patch is to fix the issue. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-10-30PM / QoS: Fix the return value of dev_pm_qos_update_request()Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
Commit e39473d (PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space) introduced __dev_pm_qos_update_request() to be called internally by dev_pm_qos_update_request(), but forgot to make the latter actually use the return value of the former. Fix this mistake. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-10-24PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user spaceRafael J. Wysocki1-36/+132
Define two device PM QoS flags, PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF and PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP, and introduce routines dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and dev_pm_qos_hide_flags() allowing the caller to expose those two flags to user space or to hide them from it, respectively. After the flags have been exposed, user space will see two additional sysfs attributes, pm_qos_no_power_off and pm_qos_remote_wakeup, under the device's /sys/devices/.../power/ directory. Then, writing 1 to one of them will update the PM QoS flags request owned by user space so that the corresponding flag is requested to be set. In turn, writing 0 to one of them will cause the corresponding flag in the user space's request to be cleared (however, the owners of the other PM QoS flags requests for the same device may still request the flag to be set and it may be effectively set even if user space doesn't request that). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Acked-by: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
2012-10-23PM / QoS: Introduce PM QoS device flags supportRafael J. Wysocki1-26/+98
Modify the device PM QoS core code to support PM QoS flags requests. First, add a new field of type struct pm_qos_flags called "flags" to struct dev_pm_qos for representing the list of PM QoS flags requests for the given device. Accordingly, add a new "type" field to struct dev_pm_qos_request (along with an enum for representing request types) and a new member called "flr" to its data union for representig flags requests. Second, modify dev_pm_qos_add_request(), dev_pm_qos_update_request(), the internal routine apply_constraint() used by them and their existing callers to cover flags requests as well as latency requests. In particular, dev_pm_qos_add_request() gets a new argument called "type" for specifying the type of a request to be added. Finally, introduce two routines, __dev_pm_qos_flags() and dev_pm_qos_flags(), allowing their callers to check which PM QoS flags have been requested for the given device (the caller is supposed to pass the mask of flags to check as the routine's second argument and examine its return value for the result). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Reviewed-by: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
2012-10-23PM / QoS: Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for more request typesRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+3
The subsequent patches will use struct dev_pm_qos_request for representing both latency requests and flags requests. To make that easier, put the node member of struct dev_pm_qos_request (under the name "pnode") into a union called "data" that will represent the request's value and list node depending on its type. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Reviewed-by: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
2012-10-23PM / QoS: Prepare device structure for adding more constraint typesRafael J. Wysocki1-20/+22
Currently struct dev_pm_info contains only one PM QoS constraints pointer reserved for latency requirements. Since one more device constraints type (i.e. flags) will be necessary, introduce a new structure, struct dev_pm_qos, that eventually will contain all of the available device PM QoS constraints and replace the "constraints" pointer in struct dev_pm_info with a pointer to the new structure called "qos". Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
2012-07-19PM / QoS: Use NULL pointer instead of plain integer in qos.cSachin Kamat1-1/+1
Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/base/power/qos.c:465:29: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-05-01PM / QoS: Create device constraints objects on notifier registrationRafael J. Wysocki1-7/+12
The current behavior of dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() makes device PM QoS notifiers less than useful. Namely, it silently returns success when called before any PM QoS constraints are added for the device, so the caller will assume that the notifier has been registered, but when someone actually adds some nontrivial constraints for the device eventually, the previous callers of dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() will not know about that and their notifier routines will not be executed (contrary to their expectations). To address this problem make dev_pm_qos_add_notifier() create the constraints object for the device if it is not present when the routine is called. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by : markgross <markgross@thegnar.org>
2012-03-14PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraintsRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+61
A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be removed from the entire domain. In that case, the amount of time necessary to runtime-resume the given device (e.g. the MMC controller) is often substantially greater than the time needed to run its driver's runtime resume callback. That may hurt performance in some situations, because user data may need to wait for the device to become operational, so we should make it possible to prevent that from happening. For this reason, introduce a new sysfs attribute for devices, power/pm_qos_resume_latency_us, allowing user space to specify the upper bound of the time necessary to bring the (runtime-suspended) device up after the resume of it has been requested. However, make that attribute appear only for the devices whose drivers declare support for it by calling the (new) dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit() helper function with the appropriate initial value of the attribute. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2011-12-26Merge branch 'pm-domains' into pm-for-linusRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+25
* pm-domains: PM / shmobile: Allow the A4R domain to be turned off at run time PM / input / touchscreen: Make st1232 use device PM QoS constraints PM / QoS: Introduce dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() PM / shmobile: Remove the stay_on flag from SH7372's PM domains PM / shmobile: Don't include SH7372's INTCS in syscore suspend/resume PM / shmobile: Add support for the sh7372 A4S power domain / sleep mode ARM: S3C64XX: Implement basic power domain support PM / shmobile: Use common always on power domain governor PM / Domains: Provide an always on power domain governor PM / Domains: Fix default system suspend/resume operations PM / Domains: Make it possible to assign names to generic PM domains PM / Domains: fix compilation failure for CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS unset PM / Domains: Automatically update overoptimistic latency information PM / Domains: Add default power off governor function (v4) PM / Domains: Add device stop governor function (v4) PM / Domains: Rework system suspend callback routines (v2) PM / Domains: Introduce "save/restore state" device callbacks PM / Domains: Make it possible to use per-device domain callbacks
2011-12-26PM / QoS: Introduce dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request()Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+25
Some devices, like the I2C controller on SH7372, are not necessary for providing power to their children or forwarding wakeup signals (and generally interrupts) from them. They are only needed by their children when there's some data to transfer, so they may be suspended for the majority of time and resumed on demand, when the children have data to send or receive. For this purpose, however, their power.ignore_children flags have to be set, or the PM core wouldn't allow them to be suspended while their children were active. Unfortunately, in some situations it may take too much time to resume such devices so that they can assist their children in transferring data. For example, if such a device belongs to a PM domain which goes to the "power off" state when that device is suspended, it may take too much time to restore power to the domain in response to the request from one of the device's children. In that case, if the parent's resume time is critical, the domain should stay in the "power on" state, although it still may be desirable to power manage the parent itself (e.g. by manipulating its clock). In general, device PM QoS may be used to address this problem. Namely, if the device's children added PM QoS latency constraints for it, they would be able to prevent it from being put into an overly deep low-power state. However, in some cases the devices needing to be serviced are not the immediate children of a "children-ignoring" device, but its grandchildren or even less direct descendants. In those cases, the entity wanting to add a PM QoS request for a given device's ancestor that ignores its children will have to find it in the first place, so introduce a new helper function that may be used to achieve that. This function, dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(), will search for the first ancestor of the given device whose power.ignore_children flag is set and will add a device PM QoS latency request for that ancestor on behalf of the caller. The request added this way may be removed with the help of dev_pm_qos_remove_request() in the future, like any other device PM QoS latency request. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-12-02PM / Runtime: Use device PM QoS constraints (v2)Rafael J. Wysocki1-8/+16
Make the runtime PM core use device PM QoS constraints to check if it is allowed to suspend a given device, so that an error code is returned if the device's own PM QoS constraint is negative or one of its children has already been suspended for too long. If this is not the case, the maximum estimated time the device is allowed to be suspended, computed as the minimum of the device's PM QoS constraint and the PM QoS constraints of its children (reduced by the difference between the current time and their suspend times) is stored in a new device's PM field power.max_time_suspended_ns that can be used by the device's subsystem or PM domain to decide whether or not to put the device into lower-power (and presumably higher-latency) states later (if the constraint is 0, which means "no constraint", the power.max_time_suspended_ns is set to -1). Additionally, the time of execution of the subsystem-level .runtime_suspend() callback for the device is recorded in the new power.suspend_time field for later use by the device's subsystem or PM domain along with power.max_time_suspended_ns (it also is used by the core code when the device's parent is suspended). Introduce a new helper function, pm_runtime_update_max_time_suspended(), allowing subsystems and PM domains (or device drivers) to update the power.max_time_suspended_ns field, for example after changing the power state of a suspended device. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-11-10PM / QoS: Properly use the WARN() macro in dev_pm_qos_add_request()Guennadi Liakhovetski1-12/+6
Make dev_pm_qos_add_request() use WARN() in a better way and do not hardcode the function's name into the message (use __func__ instead). Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-11-01drivers/base: Add export.h for EXPORT_SYMBOL/THIS_MODULE as required.Paul Gortmaker1-0/+1
Most of these files were implicitly getting EXPORT_SYMBOL via device.h which was including module.h, but that path will be broken soon. [ with input from Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> ] Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2011-10-04PM / QoS: Add function dev_pm_qos_read_value() (v3)Rafael J. Wysocki1-70/+90
To read the current PM QoS value for a given device we need to make sure that the device's power.constraints object won't be removed while we're doing that. For this reason, put the operation under dev->power.lock and acquire the lock around the initialization and removal of power.constraints. Moreover, since we're using the value of power.constraints to determine whether or not the object is present, the power.constraints_state field isn't necessary any more and may be removed. However, dev_pm_qos_add_request() needs to check if the device is being removed from the system before allocating a new PM QoS constraints object for it, so make it use the power.power_state field of struct device for this purpose. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-25PM QoS: Add global notification mechanism for device constraintsJean Pihet1-14/+75
Add a global notification chain that gets called upon changes to the aggregated constraint value for any device. The notification callbacks are passing the full constraint request data in order for the callees to have access to it. The current use is for the platform low-level code to access the target device of the constraint. Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-08-25PM QoS: Implement per-device PM QoS constraintsJean Pihet1-0/+338
Implement the per-device PM QoS constraints by creating a device PM QoS API, which calls the PM QoS constraints management core code. The per-device latency constraints data strctures are stored in the device dev_pm_info struct. The device PM code calls the init and destroy of the per-device constraints data struct in order to support the dynamic insertion and removal of the devices in the system. To minimize the data usage by the per-device constraints, the data struct is only allocated at the first call to dev_pm_qos_add_request. The data is later free'd when the device is removed from the system. A global mutex protects the constraints users from the data being allocated and free'd. Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>