summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-12-29PM: ACPI: PCI: Drop acpi_pm_set_bridge_wakeup()Rafael J. Wysocki1-29/+12
commit 7482c5cb90e5a7f9e9e12dd154d405e0219656e3 upstream. The idea behind acpi_pm_set_bridge_wakeup() was to allow bridges to be reference counted for wakeup enabling, because they may be enabled to signal wakeup on behalf of their subordinate devices and that may happen for multiple times in a row, whereas for the other devices it only makes sense to enable wakeup signaling once. However, this becomes problematic if the bridge itself is suspended, because it is treated as a "regular" device in that case and the reference counting doesn't work. For instance, suppose that there are two devices below a bridge and they both can signal wakeup. Every time one of them is suspended, wakeup signaling is enabled for the bridge, so when they both have been suspended, the bridge's wakeup reference counter value is 2. Say that the bridge is suspended subsequently and acpi_pci_wakeup() is called for it. Because the bridge can signal wakeup, that function will invoke acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() to configure it and __acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() will be called with the last argument equal to 1. This causes __acpi_device_wakeup_enable() invoked by it to omit the reference counting, because the reference counter of the target device (the bridge) is 2 at that time. Now say that the bridge resumes and one of the device below it resumes too, so the bridge's reference counter becomes 0 and wakeup signaling is disabled for it, but there is still the other suspended device which may need the bridge to signal wakeup on its behalf and that is not going to work. To address this scenario, use wakeup enable reference counting for all devices, not just for bridges, so drop the last argument from __acpi_device_wakeup_enable() and __acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup(), which causes acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() and acpi_pm_set_bridge_wakeup() to become identical, so drop the latter and use the former instead of it everywhere. Fixes: 1ba51a7c1496 ("ACPI / PCI / PM: Rework acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup()") Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-06-20ACPI: PM: Avoid using power resources if there are none for D0Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
commit 956ad9d98b73f59e442cc119c98ba1e04e94fe6d upstream. As recently reported, some platforms provide a list of power resources for device power state D3hot, through the _PR3 object, but they do not provide a list of power resources for device power state D0. Among other things, this causes acpi_device_get_power() to return D3hot as the current state of the device in question if all of the D3hot power resources are "on", because it sees the power_resources flag set and calls acpi_power_get_inferred_state() which finds that D3hot is the shallowest power state with all of the associated power resources turned "on", so that's what it returns. Moreover, that value takes precedence over the acpi_dev_pm_explicit_get() return value, because it means a deeper power state. The device may very well be in D0 physically at that point, however. Moreover, the presence of _PR3 without _PR0 for a given device means that only one D3-level power state can be supported by it. Namely, because there are no power resources to turn "off" when transitioning the device from D0 into D3cold (which should be supported since _PR3 is present), the evaluation of _PS3 should be sufficient to put it straight into D3cold, but this means that the effect of turning "on" the _PR3 power resources is unclear, so it is better to avoid doing that altogether. Consequently, there is no practical way do distinguish D3cold from D3hot for the device in question and the power states of it can be labeled so that D3hot is the deepest supported one (and Linux assumes that putting a device into D3hot via ACPI may cause power to be removed from it anyway, for legacy reasons). To work around the problem described above modify the ACPI enumeration of devices so that power resources are only used for device power management if the list of D0 power resources is not empty and make it mart D3cold as supported only if that is the case and the D3hot list of power resources is not empty too. Fixes: ef85bdbec444 ("ACPI / scan: Consolidate extraction of power resources lists") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20200603194659.185757-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/ Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-by: youling257@gmail.com Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-05PM: ACPI: Output correct message on target power stateKai-Heng Feng1-2/+2
commit a9b760b0266f563b4784f695bbd0e717610dc10a upstream. Transitioned power state logged at the end of setting ACPI power. However, D3cold won't be in the message because state can only be D3hot at most. Use target_state to corretly report when power state is D3cold. Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-12-17ACPI: PM: Avoid attaching ACPI PM domain to certain devicesRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+11
commit b9ea0bae260f6aae546db224daa6ac1bd9d94b91 upstream. Certain ACPI-enumerated devices represented as platform devices in Linux, like fans, require special low-level power management handling implemented by their drivers that is not in agreement with the ACPI PM domain behavior. That leads to problems with managing ACPI fans during system-wide suspend and resume. For this reason, make acpi_dev_pm_attach() skip the affected devices by adding a list of device IDs to avoid to it and putting the IDs of the affected devices into that list. Fixes: e5cc8ef31267 (ACPI / PM: Provide ACPI PM callback routines for subsystems) Reported-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-30ACPI / PM: Fix acpi_pm_notifier_lock vs flush_workqueue() deadlockVille Syrjälä1-9/+12
commit ff1656790b3a4caca94505c52fd0250f981ea187 upstream. acpi_remove_pm_notifier() ends up calling flush_workqueue() while holding acpi_pm_notifier_lock, and that same lock is taken by by the work via acpi_pm_notify_handler(). This can deadlock. To fix the problem let's split the single lock into two: one to protect the dev->wakeup between the work vs. add/remove, and another one to handle notifier installation vs. removal. After commit a1d14934ea4b "workqueue/lockdep: 'Fix' flush_work() annotation" I was able to kill the machine (Intel Braswell) very easily with 'powertop --auto-tune', runtime suspending i915, and trying to wake it up via the USB keyboard. The cases when it didn't die are presumably explained by lockdep getting disabled by something else (cpu hotplug locking issues usually). Fortunately I still got a lockdep report over netconsole (trickling in very slowly), even though the machine was otherwise practically dead: [ 112.179806] ====================================================== [ 114.670858] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 117.155663] 4.13.0-rc6-bsw-bisect-00169-ga1d14934ea4b #119 Not tainted [ 119.658101] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 121.310242] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: xHCI host not responding to stop endpoint command. [ 121.313294] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead [ 121.313346] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: HC died; cleaning up [ 121.313485] usb 1-6: USB disconnect, device number 3 [ 121.313501] usb 1-6.2: USB disconnect, device number 4 [ 134.747383] kworker/0:2/47 is trying to acquire lock: [ 137.220790] (acpi_pm_notifier_lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff813cafdf>] acpi_pm_notify_handler+0x2f/0x80 [ 139.721524] [ 139.721524] but task is already holding lock: [ 144.672922] ((&dpc->work)){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8109ce90>] process_one_work+0x160/0x720 [ 147.184450] [ 147.184450] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 147.184450] [ 154.604711] [ 154.604711] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 159.447888] [ 159.447888] -> #2 ((&dpc->work)){+.+.}: [ 164.183486] __lock_acquire+0x1255/0x13f0 [ 166.504313] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x210 [ 168.778973] process_one_work+0x1b9/0x720 [ 171.030316] worker_thread+0x4c/0x440 [ 173.257184] kthread+0x154/0x190 [ 175.456143] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 [ 177.624348] [ 177.624348] -> #1 ("kacpi_notify"){+.+.}: [ 181.850351] __lock_acquire+0x1255/0x13f0 [ 183.941695] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x210 [ 186.046115] flush_workqueue+0xdd/0x510 [ 190.408153] acpi_os_wait_events_complete+0x31/0x40 [ 192.625303] acpi_remove_notify_handler+0x133/0x188 [ 194.820829] acpi_remove_pm_notifier+0x56/0x90 [ 196.989068] acpi_dev_pm_detach+0x5f/0xa0 [ 199.145866] dev_pm_domain_detach+0x27/0x30 [ 201.285614] i2c_device_probe+0x100/0x210 [ 203.411118] driver_probe_device+0x23e/0x310 [ 205.522425] __driver_attach+0xa3/0xb0 [ 207.634268] bus_for_each_dev+0x69/0xa0 [ 209.714797] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [ 211.778258] bus_add_driver+0x1bc/0x230 [ 213.837162] driver_register+0x60/0xe0 [ 215.868162] i2c_register_driver+0x42/0x70 [ 217.869551] 0xffffffffa0172017 [ 219.863009] do_one_initcall+0x45/0x170 [ 221.843863] do_init_module+0x5f/0x204 [ 223.817915] load_module+0x225b/0x29b0 [ 225.757234] SyS_finit_module+0xc6/0xd0 [ 227.661851] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x120 [ 229.536819] return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x7a [ 231.392444] [ 231.392444] -> #0 (acpi_pm_notifier_lock){+.+.}: [ 235.124914] check_prev_add+0x44e/0x8a0 [ 237.024795] __lock_acquire+0x1255/0x13f0 [ 238.937351] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x210 [ 240.840799] __mutex_lock+0x75/0x940 [ 242.709517] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x20 [ 244.551478] acpi_pm_notify_handler+0x2f/0x80 [ 246.382052] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c [ 248.194412] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x30 [ 250.003925] process_one_work+0x1ec/0x720 [ 251.803191] worker_thread+0x4c/0x440 [ 253.605307] kthread+0x154/0x190 [ 255.387498] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 [ 257.153175] [ 257.153175] other info that might help us debug this: [ 257.153175] [ 262.324392] Chain exists of: [ 262.324392] acpi_pm_notifier_lock --> "kacpi_notify" --> (&dpc->work) [ 262.324392] [ 267.391997] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 267.391997] [ 270.758262] CPU0 CPU1 [ 272.431713] ---- ---- [ 274.060756] lock((&dpc->work)); [ 275.646532] lock("kacpi_notify"); [ 277.260772] lock((&dpc->work)); [ 278.839146] lock(acpi_pm_notifier_lock); [ 280.391902] [ 280.391902] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 280.391902] [ 284.986385] 2 locks held by kworker/0:2/47: [ 286.524895] #0: ("kacpi_notify"){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8109ce90>] process_one_work+0x160/0x720 [ 288.112927] #1: ((&dpc->work)){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8109ce90>] process_one_work+0x160/0x720 [ 289.727725] Fixes: c072530f391e (ACPI / PM: Revork the handling of ACPI device wakeup notifications) Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-08-18ACPI / PM: Add debug statements to acpi_pm_notify_handler()Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+7
Add statements to trace invocations of the ACPI PM notify handler and the work functions called by it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-08-01ACPI / PCI / PM: Rework acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup()Rafael J. Wysocki1-22/+50
The acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() routine is there to handle cases in which PCI bridges (or PCIe ports) are expected to signal wakeup for devices below them, but currently it doesn't do that correctly. The problem is that acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() uses acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for bridges and if that routine is called for multiple times to disable wakeup for the same device, it will disable it on the first invocation and the next calls will have no effect (it works analogously when called to enable wakeup, but that is not a problem). Now, say acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() has been called for two different devices under the same bridge and it has called acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for that bridge each time. The bridge is now enabled to generate wakeup signals. Next, suppose that one of the devices below it resumes and acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() is called to disable wakeup for that device. It will then call acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() for the bridge and that will effectively disable remote wakeup for all devices under it even though some of them may still be suspended and remote wakeup may be expected to work for them. To address this (arguably theoretical) issue, allow wakeup.enable_count under struct acpi_device to grow beyond 1 in certain situations. In particular, allow that to happen in acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup() when wakeup is enabled or disabled for PCI bridges, so that wakeup is actually disabled for the bridge when all devices under it resume and not when just one of them does that. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2017-08-01ACPI / PM: Split acpi_device_wakeup()Rafael J. Wysocki1-42/+79
To prepare for a subsequent change and make the code somewhat easier to follow, do the following in the ACPI device wakeup handling code: * Replace wakeup.flags.enabled under struct acpi_device with wakeup.enable_count as that will be necessary going forward. For now, wakeup.enable_count is not allowed to grow beyond 1, so the current behavior is retained. * Split acpi_device_wakeup() into acpi_device_wakeup_enable() and acpi_device_wakeup_disable() and modify the callers of it accordingly. * Introduce a new acpi_wakeup_lock mutex to protect the wakeup enabling/disabling code from races in case it is executed more than once in parallel for the same device (which may happen for bridges theoretically). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2017-07-11Merge tag 'devprop-4.13-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+3
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull device properties framework updates from Rafael Wysocki: "These mostly rearrange the device properties core code and add a few helper functions to it as a foundation for future work. Specifics: - Rearrange the core device properties code by moving the code specific to each supported platform configuration framework (ACPI, DT and build-in) into a separate file (Sakari Ailus). - Add helper functions for accessing device properties in a firmware-agnostic way (Sakari Ailus, Kieran Bingham)" * tag 'devprop-4.13-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: device property: Add fwnode_graph_get_port_parent device property: Add FW type agnostic fwnode_graph_get_remote_node device property: Introduce fwnode_device_is_available() device property: Move fwnode graph ops to firmware specific locations device property: Move FW type specific functionality to FW specific files ACPI: Constify argument to acpi_device_is_present()
2017-06-28PCI / PM: Drop pme_interrupt flag from struct pci_devRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+8
The pme_interrupt flag in struct pci_dev is set when PMEs generated by the device are going to be signaled via root port PME interrupts. Ironically enough, that information is only used by the code setting up device wakeup through ACPI which returns as soon as it sees the pme_interrupt flag set while setting up "remote runtime wakeup". That is questionable, however, because in theory there may be PCIe devices using out-of-band PME signaling under root ports handled by the native PME code or devices requiring wakeup power setup to be carried out by AML. For such devices, ACPI wakeup should be invoked regardless of whether or not native PME signaling is used in general. For this reason, drop the pme_interrupt flag and rework the code using it which then allows the ACPI-based device wakeup handling in PCI to be consolidated to use one code path for both "runtime remote wakeup" and system wakeup (from sleep states). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2017-06-28ACPI / PM: Consolidate device wakeup settings codeRafael J. Wysocki1-31/+8
Currently, there are two separate ways of handling device wakeup settings in the ACPI core, depending on whether this is runtime wakeup or system wakeup (from sleep states). However, after the previous commit eliminating the run_wake ACPI device wakeup flag, there is no difference between the two any more at the ACPI level, so they can be combined. For this reason, introduce acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup() to replace both acpi_pm_device_run_wake() and acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() and make it check the ACPI device object's wakeup.valid flag to determine whether or not the device can be set up to generate wakeup signals. Also notice that zpodd_enable/disable_run_wake() only call device_set_run_wake() because acpi_pm_device_run_wake() called device_run_wake(), which is not done by acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup(), so drop the now redundant device_set_run_wake() calls from there. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2017-06-22ACPI: Constify argument to acpi_device_is_present()Sakari Ailus1-1/+3
This will be needed in constifying the fwnode API. The side effects the function had have been moved to the callers. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-06-15ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idleRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+8
The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However, on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact, quite often they should just be discarded. Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path. For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops. In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due to race conditions. In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from suspending is not enabled. However, to preserve the existing behavior with respect to suspend-to-RAM, this only is done in the suspend-to-idle case and only if an SCI has occurred while suspended. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-06-15ACPI / PM: Clean up device wakeup enable/disable codeRafael J. Wysocki1-11/+8
The wakeup.flags.enabled flag in struct acpi_device is not used consistently, as there is no reason why it should only apply to the enabling/disabling of the wakeup GPE, so put the invocation of acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power() under it too. Moreover, it is not necessary to call acpi_enable_wakeup_devices() and acpi_disable_wakeup_devices() for suspend-to-idle, so don't do that. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-06-15ACPI / PM: Change log level of wakeup-related messageRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+2
Change the log level of the "System wakeup enabled/disabled by ACPI" message in acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() to "debug" to reduce to log noise level. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-06-15ACPI / PM: Run wakeup notify handlers synchronouslyRafael J. Wysocki1-16/+11
The work functions provided by the users of acpi_add_pm_notifier() should be run synchronously before re-enabling the wakeup GPE in case they are used to clear the status and/or disable the wakeup signaling at the source. Otherwise, which is the case currently in the PCI bus type code, the same wakeup event may be signaled for multiple times while the execution of the work function in response to it has already been queued up. Fortunately, acpi_add_pm_notifier() is only used by PCI and by ACPI device PM code internally, so the change is relatively straightforward to make. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2017-06-07Revert "ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle"Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+1
Revert commit eed4d47efe95 (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle) as it turned out to be premature and triggered a number of different issues on various systems. That includes, but is not limited to, premature suspend-to-RAM aborts on Dell XPS 13 (9343) reported by Dominik. The issue the commit in question attempted to address is real and will need to be taken care of going forward, but evidently more work is needed for this purpose. Reported-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-05-05ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idleRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+2
The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However, on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact, quite often they should just be discarded. Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path. For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops. In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due to race conditions. In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from suspending is not enabled (that also helps to catch device-induced wakeup events occurring during suspend transitions in progress). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-05-20ACPI / PM: Export acpi_device_fix_up_power()Ulf Hansson1-0/+1
Drivers that needs acpi_device_fix_up_power(), allow them to be built as modules by exporting this function. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.5+ Tested-by: Laszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-01-08PM / Domains: add setter for dev.pm_domainTomeu Vizoso1-2/+3
Adds a function that sets the pointer to dev_pm_domain in struct device and that warns if the device has already finished probing. The reason why we want to enforce that is because in the general case that can cause problems and also that we can simplify code quite a bit if we can always assume that. This patch also changes all current code that directly sets the dev.pm_domain pointer. Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-10-14PM / PCI / ACPI: Kick devices that might have been reset by firmwareRafael J. Wysocki1-18/+1
There is a concern that if the platform firmware was involved in the system resume that's being completed, some devices might have been reset by it and if those devices had the power.direct_complete flag set during the preceding suspend transition, they may stay in a reset-power-on state indefinitely (until they are runtime-resumed and then suspended again). That may not be a big deal from the individual device's perspective, but if the system is an SoC, it may be prevented from entering deep SoC-wide low-power states on idle because of that. The devices that are most likely to be affected by this issue are PCI devices and ACPI-enumerated devices using the general ACPI PM domain, so to prevent it from happening for those devices, force a runtime resume for them if they have their power.direct_complete flags set and the platform firmware was involved in the resume transition currently in progress. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-09-01Merge branch 'acpi-pm'Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+8
* acpi-pm: ACPI / bus: Move duplicate code to a separate new function mfd: Add support for Intel Sunrisepoint LPSS devices dmaengine: add a driver for Intel integrated DMA 64-bit mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order driver core: implement device_for_each_child_reverse() klist: implement klist_prev() Driver core: wakeup the parent device before trying probe ACPI / PM: Attach ACPI power domain only once PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose device latency tolerance to userspace ACPI / PM: Update the copyright notice and description of power.c
2015-09-01Merge branches 'acpi-scan', 'acpi-processor' and 'acpi-assorted'Rafael J. Wysocki1-4/+0
* acpi-scan: ACPI / bus: Move ACPI bus type registration ACPI / scan: Move bus operations and notification routines to bus.c ACPI / scan: Move device matching code to bus.c ACPI / scan: Move sysfs-related device code to a separate file * acpi-processor: PCC: Disable compilation by default ACPI: Decouple ACPI idle and ACPI processor drivers ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver PCC: Initialize PCC Mailbox earlier at boot ACPI / processor: remove leftover __refdata annotations * acpi-assorted: ACPI: fix acpi_debugfs_init prototype ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addresses
2015-07-31Merge back earlier ACPI PM material for v4.3.Rafael J. Wysocki1-0/+8
2015-07-28ACPI / PM: Use target_state to set the device power stateMika Westerberg1-1/+1
Commit 20dacb71ad28 ("ACPI / PM: Rework device power management to follow ACPI 6") changed the device power management to use D3hot if the device in question does not have _PR3 method even if D3cold was requested by the caller. However, if the device has _PR3 device->power.state is also set to D3hot instead of D3Cold after power resources have been turned off because device->power.state will be assigned from "state" instead of "target_state". Next time the device is transitioned to D0, acpi_power_transition() will find that the current power state of the device is D3hot instead of D3cold which causes it to power down all resources required for the current (wrong) state D3hot. Below is a simplified ASL example of a real touch panel device which triggers the problem: Scope (TPL1) { Name (_PR0, Package (1) { \_SB.PCI0.I2C1.PXTC }) Name (_PR3, Package (1) { \_SB.PCI0.I2C1.PXTC }) ... } In both D0 and D3hot the same power resource is required. However, when acpi_power_transition() turns off power resources required for D3hot (as the device is transitioned to D0) it powers down PXTC which then makes the device to lose its power. Fix this by assigning "target_state" to the device power state instead of "state" that is always D3hot even for devices with valid _PR3. Fixes: 20dacb71ad28 (ACPI / PM: Rework device power management to follow ACPI 6) Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-28ACPI / PM: Attach ACPI power domain only onceMika Westerberg1-0/+8
Some devices, like MFD subdevices, share a single ACPI companion device so that they are able to access their resources and children. However, currently all these subdevices are attached to the ACPI power domain and this might cause that the power methods for the companion device get called more than once. In order to solve this we attach the ACPI power domain only to the first physical device that is bound to the ACPI companion device. In case of MFD devices, this is the parent MFD device itself. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2015-07-08ACPI: Remove FSF mailing addressesJarkko Nikula1-4/+0
There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-06-10ACPI / PM: Add missing pm_generic_complete() invocationRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+1
Add missing invocation of pm_generic_complete() to acpi_subsys_complete() to allow ->complete callbacks provided by the drivers of devices using the ACPI PM domain to be executed during system resume. Fixes: f25c0ae2b4c4 (ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM domain during system suspend) Cc: 3.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.16+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-05-16ACPI / PM: Rework device power management to follow ACPI 6Rafael J. Wysocki1-39/+58
The ACPI 6 specification has made some changes in the device power management area. In particular: * The D3hot power state is now supposed to be always available (instead of D3cold) and D3cold is only regarded as valid if the _PR3 object is present for the given device. * The required ordering of transitions into power states deeper than D0 is now such that for a transition into state Dx the _PSx method is supposed to be executed first, if present, and the states of the power resources the device depends on are supposed to be changed after that. * It is now explicitly forbidden to transition devices from lower-power (deeper) into higher-power (shallower) power states other than D0. Those changes have been made so the specification reflects the Windows' device power management code that the vast majority of systems using ACPI is validated against. To avoid artificial differences in ACPI device power management between Windows and Linux, modify the ACPI device power management code to follow the new specification. Add comments explaining the code flow in some unclear places. This only may affect some real corner cases in which the OS behavior expected by the firmware is different from the Windows one, but that's quite unlikely. The transition ordering change affects transitions to D1 and D2 which are rarely used (if at all) and into D3hot and D3cold for devices actually having _PR3, but those are likely to be validated against Windows anyway. The other changes may affect code calling acpi_device_get_power() or acpi_device_update_power() where ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may be returned instead of ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD (that's why the ACPI fan driver needs to be updated too) and since transitions into ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT may remove power now, it is better to avoid this one in acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() if the "no power off" PM QoS flag is set. The only existing user of acpi_device_can_poweroff() really cares about the case when _PR3 is present, so the change in that function should not cause any problems to happen too. A plus is that PCI_D3hot can be mapped to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT now and the compatibility with older systems should be covered automatically. In any case, if any real problems result from this, it still will be better to follow the Windows' behavior (which now is reflected by the specification too) in general and handle the cases when it doesn't work via quirks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-02-09ACPI / PM: Remove unneeded nested #ifdefAndreas Ruprecht1-2/+0
In commit 5de21bb998b8 ("ACPI / PM: Drop CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME from the ACPI core"), all occurrences of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME were replaced with CONFIG_PM. This created the following structure of #ifdef blocks in the code: [...] #ifdef CONFIG_PM #ifdef CONFIG_PM /* always on / undead */ #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP [...] #endif #endif [...] #endif This patch removes the inner "#ifdef CONFIG_PM" block as it will always be enabled when the outer block is enabled. This inconsistency was found using the undertaker-checkpatch tool. Signed-off-by: Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@einserver.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-01-06ACPI / PM: Fix PM initialization for devices that are not presentRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
If an ACPI device object whose _STA returns 0 (not present and not functional) has _PR0 or _PS0, its power_manageable flag will be set and acpi_bus_init_power() will return 0 for it. Consequently, if such a device object is passed to the ACPI device PM functions, they will attempt to carry out the requested operation on the device, although they should not do that for devices that are not present. To fix that problem make acpi_bus_init_power() return an error code for devices that are not present which will cause power_manageable to be cleared for them as appropriate in acpi_bus_get_power_flags(). However, the lists of power resources should not be freed for the device in that case, so modify acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to keep those lists even if acpi_bus_init_power() returns an error. Accordingly, when deciding whether or not the lists of power resources need to be freed, acpi_free_power_resources_lists() should check the power.flags.power_resources flag instead of flags.power_manageable, so make that change too. Furthermore, if acpi_bus_attach() sees that flags.initialized is unset for the given device, it should reset the power management settings of the device and re-initialize them from scratch instead of relying on the previous settings (the device may have appeared after being not present previously, for example), so make it use the 'valid' flag of the D0 power state as the initial value of flags.power_manageable for it and call acpi_bus_init_power() to discover its current power state. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+
2014-12-18Merge branches 'acpi-scan', 'acpi-utils' and 'acpi-pm'Rafael J. Wysocki1-2/+10
* acpi-scan: ACPI / scan: Change the level of _DEP-related messages to KERN_DEBUG * acpi-utils: ACPI / utils: Drop error messages from acpi_evaluate_reference() * acpi-pm: ACPI / PM: Do not disable wakeup GPEs that have not been enabled
2014-12-13ACPI / PM: Do not disable wakeup GPEs that have not been enabledRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+10
In some cases acpi_device_wakeup() may be called to ensure wakeup power to be off for a given device even though that device's wakeup GPE has not been enabled so far. It calls acpi_disable_gpe() on a GPE that's not enabled and this causes ACPICA to return the AE_LIMIT status code from that call which then is reported as an error by the ACPICA's debug facilities (if enabled). This may lead to a fair amount of confusion, so introduce a new ACPI device wakeup flag to store the wakeup GPE status and avoid disabling wakeup GPEs that have not been enabled. Reported-and-tested-by: Venkat Raghavulu <venkat.raghavulu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-12-08Merge branch 'pm-runtime'Rafael J. Wysocki1-6/+2
* pm-runtime: (25 commits) i2c-omap / PM: Drop CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME from i2c-omap.c dmaengine / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM drivers: sh / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM e1000e / igb / PM: Eliminate CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME MMC / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM MFD / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM misc / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM media / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM input / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM iio / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM hsi / OMAP / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM i2c-hid / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM drm / exynos / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM gpio / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM hwrandom / exynos / PM: Use CONFIG_PM in #ifdef block / PM: Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM USB / PM: Drop CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME from the USB core PM: Merge the SET*_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() macros PM / Kconfig: Do not select PM directly from Kconfig files PCI / PM: Drop CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME from the PCI core ...
2014-12-04ACPI / PM: Drop CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME from the ACPI coreRafael J. Wysocki1-6/+2
After commit b2b49ccbdd54 (PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is selected) PM_RUNTIME is always set if PM is set, so quite a few depend on CONFIG_PM. Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM in the ACPI core code. Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-25ACPI / PM: Fixed a typo in a commentHuang Rui1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-11-20ACPI / PM: Ignore wakeup setting if the ACPI companion can't wake upRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
As reported by Dmitry, on some Chromebooks there are devices with corresponding ACPI objects and with unusual system wakeup configuration. Namely, they technically are wakeup-capable, but the wakeup is handled via a platform-specific out-of-band mechanism and the ACPI PM layer has no information on the wakeup capability. As a result, device_may_wakeup(dev) called from acpi_dev_suspend_late() returns 'true' for those devices, but the wakeup.flags.valid flag is unset for the corresponding ACPI device objects, so acpi_device_wakeup() reproducibly fails for them causing acpi_dev_suspend_late() to return an error code. The entire system suspend is then aborted and the machines in question cannot suspend at all. Address the problem by ignoring the device_may_wakeup(dev) return value in acpi_dev_suspend_late() if the ACPI companion of the device being handled has wakeup.flags.valid unset (in which case it is clear that the wakeup is supposed to be handled by other means). This fixes a regression introduced by commit a76e9bd89ae7 (i2c: attach/detach I2C client device to the ACPI power domain) as the affected systems could suspend and resume successfully before that commit. Fixes: a76e9bd89ae7 (i2c: attach/detach I2C client device to the ACPI power domain) Reported-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-10-24Merge tag 'pm+acpi-3.18-rc2' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull ACPI and power management updates from Rafael Wysocki: "This is material that didn't make it to my 3.18-rc1 pull request for various reasons, mostly related to timing and travel (LinuxCon EU / LPC) plus a couple of fixes for recent bugs. The only really new thing here is the PM QoS class for memory bandwidth, but it is simple enough and users of it will be added in the next cycle. One major change in behavior is that platform devices enumerated by ACPI will use 32-bit DMA mask by default. Also included is an ACPICA update to a new upstream release, but that's mostly cleanups, changes in tools and similar. The rest is fixes and cleanups mostly. Specifics: - Fix for a recent PCI power management change that overlooked the fact that some IRQ chips might not be able to configure PCIe PME for system wakeup from Lucas Stach. - Fix for a bug introduced in 3.17 where acpi_device_wakeup() is called with a wrong ordering of arguments from Zhang Rui. - A bunch of intel_pstate driver fixes (all -stable candidates) from Dirk Brandewie, Gabriele Mazzotta and Pali Rohár. - Fixes for a rather long-standing problem with the OOM killer and the freezer that frozen processes killed by the OOM do not actually release any memory until they are thawed, so OOM-killing them is rather pointless, with a couple of cleanups on top (Michal Hocko, Cong Wang, Rafael J Wysocki). - ACPICA update to upstream release 20140926, inlcuding mostly cleanups reducing differences between the upstream ACPICA and the kernel code, tools changes (acpidump, acpiexec) and support for the _DDN object (Bob Moore, Lv Zheng). - New PM QoS class for memory bandwidth from Tomeu Vizoso. - Default 32-bit DMA mask for platform devices enumerated by ACPI (this change is mostly needed for some drivers development in progress targeted at 3.19) from Heikki Krogerus. - ACPI EC driver cleanups, mostly related to debugging, from Lv Zheng. - cpufreq-dt driver updates from Thomas Petazzoni. - powernv cpuidle driver update from Preeti U Murthy" * tag 'pm+acpi-3.18-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (34 commits) intel_pstate: Correct BYT VID values. intel_pstate: Fix BYT frequency reporting intel_pstate: Don't lose sysfs settings during cpu offline cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reflect current no_turbo state correctly cpufreq: expose scaling_cur_freq sysfs file for set_policy() drivers cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix setting max_perf_pct in performance policy PCI / PM: handle failure to enable wakeup on PCIe PME ACPI: invoke acpi_device_wakeup() with correct parameters PM / freezer: Clean up code after recent fixes PM: convert do_each_thread to for_each_process_thread OOM, PM: OOM killed task shouldn't escape PM suspend freezer: remove obsolete comments in __thaw_task() freezer: Do not freeze tasks killed by OOM killer ACPI / platform: provide default DMA mask cpuidle: powernv: Populate cpuidle state details by querying the device-tree cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: adjust message related to regulators cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: extend with platform_data cpufreq: allow driver-specific data ACPI / EC: Cleanup coding style. ACPI / EC: Refine event/query debugging messages. ...
2014-10-24Merge branch 'next' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux Pull thermal management updates from Zhang Rui: "Sorry that I missed the merge window as there is a bug found in the last minute, and I have to fix it and wait for the code to be tested in linux-next tree for a few days. Now the buggy patch has been dropped entirely from my next branch. Thus I hope those changes can still be merged in 3.18-rc2 as most of them are platform thermal driver changes. Specifics: - introduce ACPI INT340X thermal drivers. Newer laptops and tablets may have thermal sensors and other devices with thermal control capabilities that are exposed for the OS to use via the ACPI INT340x device objects. Several drivers are introduced to expose the temperature information and cooling ability from these objects to user-space via the normal thermal framework. From: Lu Aaron, Lan Tianyu, Jacob Pan and Zhang Rui. - introduce a new thermal governor, which just uses a hysteresis to switch abruptly on/off a cooling device. This governor can be used to control certain fan devices that can not be throttled but just switched on or off. From: Peter Feuerer. - introduce support for some new thermal interrupt functions on i.MX6SX, in IMX thermal driver. From: Anson, Huang. - introduce tracing support on thermal framework. From: Punit Agrawal. - small fixes in OF thermal and thermal step_wise governor" * 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux: (25 commits) Thermal: int340x thermal: select ACPI fan driver Thermal: int3400_thermal: use acpi_thermal_rel parsing APIs Thermal: int340x_thermal: expose acpi thermal relationship tables Thermal: introduce int3403 thermal driver Thermal: introduce INT3402 thermal driver Thermal: move the KELVIN_TO_MILLICELSIUS macro to thermal.h ACPI / Fan: support INT3404 thermal device ACPI / Fan: add ACPI 4.0 style fan support ACPI / fan: convert to platform driver ACPI / fan: use acpi_device_xxx_power instead of acpi_bus equivelant ACPI / fan: remove no need check for device pointer ACPI / fan: remove unused macro Thermal: int3400 thermal: register to thermal framework Thermal: int3400 thermal: add capability to detect supporting UUIDs Thermal: introduce int3400 thermal driver ACPI: add ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE support to acpi_extract_package() ACPI: make acpi_create_platform_device() an external API thermal: step_wise: fix: Prevent from binary overflow when trend is dropping ACPI: introduce ACPI int340x thermal scan handler thermal: Added Bang-bang thermal governor ...
2014-10-24Merge branches 'acpi-pm' and 'pm-genirq'Rafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
* acpi-pm: ACPI: invoke acpi_device_wakeup() with correct parameters * pm-genirq: PCI / PM: handle failure to enable wakeup on PCIe PME
2014-10-24ACPI: invoke acpi_device_wakeup() with correct parametersZhang Rui1-1/+1
Fix a bug that invokes acpi_device_wakeup() with wrong parameters. Fixes: f35cec255557 (ACPI / PM: Always enable wakeup GPEs when enabling device wakeup) Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: 3.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.17+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-10-10ACPI / fan: use acpi_device_xxx_power instead of acpi_bus equivelantAaron Lu1-0/+1
When we have the acpi_device pointer, there is no need to pass the device's handle to the acpi_bus_xxx_power functions to get/set/update the device's power state, instead, use the acpi_device_xxx_power functions directly. To make this happen for fan module, export acpi_device_update_power. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
2014-09-22ACPI / PM: Convert acpi_dev_pm_detach() into a static functionUlf Hansson1-35/+34
The ->detach() callback for the PM domain has now been fully adopted, thus there no users left of the acpi_dev_pm_detach() API. This allow us to convert it into a static function. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-09-22ACPI / PM: Assign the ->detach() callback when attaching the PM domainUlf Hansson1-0/+2
As as preparation to simplify the detachment of devices from their PM domains, we assign the ->detach() callback to genpd_dev_pm_detach(). Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-07-23ACPI / PM: Use ACPI_COMPANION() instead of ACPI_HANDLE()Rafael J. Wysocki1-12/+9
The ACPI_HANDLE() macro evaluates ACPI_COMPANION() internally to return the handle of the device's ACPI companion, so it is much more straightforward and efficient to use ACPI_COMPANION() directly to obtain the device's ACPI companion object instead of using ACPI_HANDLE() and acpi_bus_get_device() on the returned handle for the same thing. Do that in three places in the ACPI device PM code. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-07-23ACPI / PM: Always enable wakeup GPEs when enabling device wakeupRafael J. Wysocki1-32/+17
Wakeup GPEs are currently only enabled when setting up devices for remote wakeup at run time. During system-wide transitions they are enabled by ACPICA at the very last stage of suspend (before asking the BIOS to take over). Of course, that only works for system sleep states supported by ACPI, so in particular it doesn't work for the "freeze" sleep state. For this reason, modify the ACPI core device PM code to enable wakeup GPEs for devices when setting them up for wakeup regardless of whether that is remote wakeup at runtime or system wakeup. That allows the same device wakeup setup routine to be used for both runtime PM and system-wide PM and makes it possible to reduce code size quite a bit. This make ACPI-based PCI Wake-on-LAN work with the "freeze" sleep state on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500 and should help other systems too. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-07-23ACPI / PM: Revork the handling of ACPI device wakeup notificationsRafael J. Wysocki1-22/+58
Since ACPI wakeup GPEs are going to be enabled during system suspend as well as for runtime wakeup by a subsequent patch and the same notify handlers will be used in both cases, rework the ACPI device wakeup notification framework so that the part specific to physical devices is always run asynchronously from the PM workqueue. This prevents runtime resume callbacks for those devices from being run during system suspend and resume which may not be appropriate, among other things. Also make ACPI device wakeup notification handling a bit more robust agaist subsequent removal of ACPI device objects, whould that ever happen, and create a wakeup source object for each ACPI device configured for wakeup so that wakeup notifications for those devices can wake up the system from the "freeze" sleep state. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-20ACPI / PM: Export rest of the subsys PM callbacksHeikki Krogerus1-1/+4
No reason for excluding the remaining ones. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> [rjw: Rebased and exported the new acpi_subsys_complete() too.] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-20ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM domain during system suspendRafael J. Wysocki1-7/+36
Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.) if that isn't necessary. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-04ACPI / PM: Resume runtime-suspended devices later during system suspendRafael J. Wysocki1-3/+38
Runtime-suspended devices are resumed during system suspend by acpi_subsys_prepare() for two reasons: First, because they may need to be reprogrammed in order to change their wakeup settings and, second, because they may need to be operatonal for their children to be successfully suspended. That is a problem, though, if there are many runtime-suspended devices that need to be resumed this way during system suspend, because the .prepare() PM callbacks of devices are executed sequentially and the times taken by them accumulate, which may increase the total system suspend time quite a bit. For this reason, move the resume of runtime-suspended devices up to the next phase of device suspend (during system suspend), except for the ones that have power.ignore_children set. The exception is made, because the devices with power.ignore_children set may still be necessary for their children to be successfully suspended (during system suspend) and they won't be resumed automatically as a result of the runtime resume of their children. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>