summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-01-03ACPI / PM: Do not apply ACPI_SUCCESS() to acpi_bus_get_device() resultRafael J. Wysocki1-2/+1
Since the return value of acpi_bus_get_device() is not of type acpi_status, ACPI_SUCCESS() should not be used for checking its return value. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-26ACPI / PM: Allow attach/detach routines to change device power statesRafael J. Wysocki1-4/+24
Make it possible to ask the routines used for adding/removing devices to/from the general ACPI PM domain, acpi_dev_pm_attach() and acpi_dev_pm_detach(), respectively, to change the power states of devices so that they are put into the full-power state automatically by acpi_dev_pm_attach() and into the lowest-power state available automatically by acpi_dev_pm_detach(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI / PM: Provide ACPI PM callback routines for subsystemsRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+317
Some bus types don't support power management natively, but generally there may be device nodes in ACPI tables corresponding to the devices whose bus types they are (under ACPI 5 those bus types may be SPI, I2C and platform). If that is the case, standard ACPI power management may be applied to those devices, although currently the kernel has no means for that. For this reason, provide a set of routines that may be used as power management callbacks for such devices. This may be done in three different ways. (1) Device drivers handling the devices in question may run acpi_dev_pm_attach() in their .probe() routines, which (on success) will cause the devices to be added to the general ACPI PM domain and ACPI power management will be used for them going forward. Then, acpi_dev_pm_detach() may be used to remove the devices from the general ACPI PM domain if ACPI power management is not necessary for them any more. (2) The devices' subsystems may use acpi_subsys_runtime_suspend(), acpi_subsys_runtime_resume(), acpi_subsys_prepare(), acpi_subsys_suspend_late(), acpi_subsys_resume_early() as their power management callbacks in the same way as the general ACPI PM domain does that. (3) The devices' drivers may execute acpi_dev_suspend_late(), acpi_dev_resume_early(), acpi_dev_runtime_suspend(), acpi_dev_runtime_resume() from their power management callbacks as appropriate, if that's absolutely necessary, but it is not recommended to do that, because such drivers may not work without ACPI support as a result. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI / PM: Move device PM functions related to sleep statesRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+54
Introduce helper function returning the target sleep state of the system and use it to move the remaining device power management functions from sleep.c to device_pm.c. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI / PM: Split device wakeup management routinesRafael J. Wysocki1-17/+57
Two device wakeup management routines in device_pm.c and sleep.c, acpi_pm_device_run_wake() and acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(), take a device pointer argument and use it to obtain the ACPI handle of the corresponding ACPI namespace node. That handle is then used to get the address of the struct acpi_device object corresponding to the struct device passed as the argument. Unfortunately, that last operation may be costly, because it involves taking the global ACPI namespace mutex, so it shouldn't be carried out too often. However, the callers of those routines usually call them in a row with acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() which also takes that mutex for the same reason, so it would be more efficient if they ran acpi_bus_get_device() themselves to obtain a pointer to the struct acpi_device object in question and then passed that pointer to the appropriate PM routines. To make that possible, split each of the PM routines mentioned above in two parts, one taking a struct acpi_device pointer argument and the other implementing the current interface for compatibility. Additionally, change acpi_pm_device_run_wake() to actually return an error code if there is an error while setting up runtime remote wakeup for the device. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI / PM: Move runtime remote wakeup setup routine to device_pm.cRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+39
The ACPI function for setting up devices to do runtime remote wakeup is now located in drivers/acpi/sleep.c, but drivers/acpi/device_pm.c is a more logical place for it, so move it there. No functional changes should result from this modification. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI / PM: Move device power state selection routine to device_pm.cRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+107
The ACPI function for choosing device power state is now located in drivers/acpi/sleep.c, but drivers/acpi/device_pm.c is a more logical place for it, so move it there. However, instead of moving the function entirely, move its core only under a different name and with a different list of arguments, so that it is more flexible, and leave a wrapper around it in the original location. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI / PM: Move routines for adding/removing device wakeup notifiersRafael J. Wysocki1-0/+91
ACPI routines for adding and removing device wakeup notifiers are currently defined in a PCI-specific file, but they will be necessary for non-PCI devices too, so move them to a separate file under drivers/acpi and rename them to indicate their ACPI origins. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>