| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This patch changes sha1 to the new shash interface.
Signed-off-by: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <ken@codelabs.ch>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini()
> > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini
>
> This part ist OK.
>
> > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the
> > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist)
>
> Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start
> confusing them.
>
> What about foo_modinit instead?
Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini.
Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Not architecture specific code should not #include <asm/scatterlist.h>.
This patch therefore either replaces them with
#include <linux/scatterlist.h> or simply removes them if they were
unused.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
|
|
There are currently several SHA implementations that all define their own
initialization vectors and size values. Since this values are idential
move them to a header file under include/crypto.
Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jang@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Loading the crypto algorithm by the alias instead of by module directly
has the advantage that all possible implementations of this algorithm
are loaded automatically and the crypto API can choose the best one
depending on its priority.
Additionally it ensures that the generic implementation as well as the
HW driver (if available) is loaded in case the HW driver needs the
generic version as fallback in corner cases.
Also remove the probe for sha1 in padlock's init code.
Quote from Herbert:
The probe is actually pointless since we can always probe when
the algorithm is actually used which does not lead to dead-locks
like this.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
