summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/crypto/md5.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-04-21[CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()Kamalesh Babulal1-4/+4
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead? Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_init () and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2006-06-26[CRYPTO] all: Pass tfm instead of ctx to algorithmsHerbert Xu1-6/+6
Up until now algorithms have been happy to get a context pointer since they know everything that's in the tfm already (e.g., alignment, block size). However, once we have parameterised algorithms, such information will be specific to each tfm. So the algorithm API needs to be changed to pass the tfm structure instead of the context pointer. This patch is basically a text substitution. The only tricky bit is the assembly routines that need to get the context pointer offset through asm-offsets.h. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2006-01-10[CRYPTO] Use standard byte order macros wherever possibleHerbert Xu1-0/+1
A lot of crypto code needs to read/write a 32-bit/64-bit words in a specific gender. Many of them open code them by reading/writing one byte at a time. This patch converts all the applicable usages over to use the standard byte order macros. This is based on a previous patch by Denis Vlasenko. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2005-04-17Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds1-0/+244
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!