summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block/bfq-iosched.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-01-30block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_dataKemeng Shi1-4/+0
bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time is set to 0 in bfq_init_queue and is never changed. It is only used in bfq_wr_duration when bfq_wr_max_time > 0 which never meets, so bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time is not used actually. Just remove it. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqqKemeng Shi1-6/+3
We jump to tag only for returning current rq. Return directly to remove this tag. Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperatorKemeng Shi1-2/+0
We have already avoided a circular list in bfq_setup_merge (see comments in bfq_setup_merge() for details), so bfq_queue will not appear in it's new_bfqq list. Just remove this check. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: remove unnecessary dereference to get async_bfqqKemeng Shi1-1/+1
The async_bfqq is assigned with bfqq->bic->bfqq[0], use it directly. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of requestKemeng Shi1-3/+3
Use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctlyKemeng Shi1-0/+2
Inject limit is updated or reset when time_is_before_eq_jiffies( decrease_time_jif + several msecs) or think-time state changes. decrease_time_jif is initialized to 0 and will be set to current jiffies when inject limit is updated or reset. If the jiffies is slightly greater than LONG_MAX, time_is_after_eq_jiffies(0) will keep for a long time, so as time_is_after_eq_jiffies(decrease_time_jif + several msecs). If the think-time state never chages, then the injection will not work as expected for long time. To be more specific: Function bfq_update_inject_limit maybe triggered when jiffies pasts decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(10) in bfq_add_request by setting bfqd->wait_dispatch to true. Function bfq_reset_inject_limit are called in two conditions: 1. jiffies pasts bfqq->decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(1000) in function bfq_add_request. 2. jiffies pasts bfqq->decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(100) or bfq think-time state change from short to long. Fix this by initializing bfqq->decrease_time_jif to current jiffies to trigger service injection soon when service injection conditions are met. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slowKemeng Shi1-3/+2
Parameter reason is never used, just remove it. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injectionKemeng Shi1-6/+4
Function bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection may temporarily raise inject limit to one request if current inject_limit is 0 before search of the source queue for injection. However the search below will reset inject limit to bfqd->in_service_queue which is zero for raised inject limit. Then the temporarily raised inject limit never works as expected. Assigment limit to bfqd->in_service_queue in search is needed as limit maybe overwriten to min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) for condition that a large in-flight request is on non-rotational devices in found queue. So we need to reset limit to bfqd->in_service_queue for normal case. Actually, we have already make sure bfqd->rq_in_driver is < limit before search, then -Limit is >= 1 as bfqd->rq_in_driver is >= 0. Then min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) is always 1. So we can simply check bfqd->rq_in_driver with 1 instead of result of min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) for larget request in non-rotational device case to avoid overwritting limit and the bug is gone. -For normal case, we have already check bfqd->rq_in_driver is < limit, so we can return found bfqq unconditionally to remove unncessary check. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116095153.3810101-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: balance I/O injection among underutilized actuatorsDavide Zini1-5/+13
Upon the invocation of its dispatch function, BFQ returns the next I/O request of the in-service bfq_queue, unless some exception holds. One such exception is that there is some underutilized actuator, different from the actuator for which the in-service queue contains I/O, and that some other bfq_queue happens to contain I/O for such an actuator. In this case, the next I/O request of the latter bfq_queue, and not of the in-service bfq_queue, is returned (I/O is injected from that bfq_queue). To find such an actuator, a linear scan, in increasing index order, is performed among actuators. Performing a linear scan entails a prioritization among actuators: an underutilized actuator may be considered for injection only if all actuators with a lower index are currently fully utilized, or if there is no pending I/O for any lower-index actuator that happens to be underutilized. This commits breaks this prioritization and tends to distribute injection uniformly across actuators. This is obtained by adding the following condition to the linear scan: even if an actuator A is underutilized, A is however skipped if its load is higher than that of the next actuator. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Davide Zini <davidezini2@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-9-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: inject I/O to underutilized actuatorsDavide Zini1-35/+101
The main service scheme of BFQ for sync I/O is serving one sync bfq_queue at a time, for a while. In particular, BFQ enforces this scheme when it deems the latter necessary to boost throughput or to preserve service guarantees. Unfortunately, when BFQ enforces this policy, only one actuator at a time gets served for a while, because each bfq_queue contains I/O only for one actuator. The other actuators may remain underutilized. Actually, BFQ may serve (inject) extra I/O, taken from other bfq_queues, in parallel with that of the in-service queue. This injection mechanism may provide the ground for dealing also with the above actuator-underutilization problem. Yet BFQ does not take the actuator load into account when choosing which queue to pick extra I/O from. In addition, BFQ may happen to inject extra I/O only when the in-service queue is temporarily empty. In view of these facts, this commit extends the injection mechanism in such a way that the latter: (1) takes into account also the actuator load; (2) checks such a load on each dispatch, and injects I/O for an underutilized actuator, if there is one and there is I/O for it. To perform the check in (2), this commit introduces a load threshold, currently set to 4. A linear scan of each actuator is performed, until an actuator is found for which the following two conditions hold: the load of the actuator is below the threshold, and there is at least one non-in-service queue that contains I/O for that actuator. If such a pair (actuator, queue) is found, then the head request of that queue is returned for dispatch, instead of the head request of the in-service queue. We have set the threshold, empirically, to the minimum possible value for which an actuator is fully utilized, or close to be fully utilized. By doing so, injected I/O 'steals' as few drive-queue slots as possibile to the in-service queue. This reduces as much as possible the probability that the service of I/O from the in-service bfq_queue gets delayed because of slot exhaustion, i.e., because all the slots of the drive queue are filled with I/O injected from other queues (NCQ provides for 32 slots). This new mechanism also counters actuator underutilization in the case of asymmetric configurations of bfq_queues. Namely if there are few bfq_queues containing I/O for some actuators and many bfq_queues containing I/O for other actuators. Or if the bfq_queues containing I/O for some actuators have lower weights than the other bfq_queues. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Davide Zini <davidezini2@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-8-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: retrieve independent access ranges from request queueFederico Gavioli1-8/+51
This patch implements the code to gather the content of the independent_access_ranges structure from the request_queue and copy it into the queue's bfq_data. This copy is done at queue initialization. We copy the access ranges into the bfq_data to avoid taking the queue lock each time we access the ranges. This implementation, however, puts a limit to the maximum independent ranges supported by the scheduler. Such a limit is equal to the constant BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS. This limit was placed to avoid the allocation of dynamic memory. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Co-developed-by: Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@seagate.com> Signed-off-by: Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@seagate.com> Signed-off-by: Federico Gavioli <f.gavioli97@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-7-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: split also async bfq_queues on a per-actuator basisDavide Zini1-18/+23
Similarly to sync bfq_queues, also async bfq_queues need to be split on a per-actuator basis. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Davide Zini <davidezini2@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-6-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cqPaolo Valente1-41/+59
When a bfq_queue Q is merged with another queue, several pieces of information are saved about Q. These pieces are stored in the bfqq_data field in the bfq_io_cq data structure of the process associated with Q. Yet, with a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with multiple bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. Each of these queues may undergo a merge. So, the bfq_io_cq data structure must be able to accommodate the above information for N queues. This commit solves this problem by turning the bfqq_data scalar field into an array of N elements (and by changing code so as to handle this array). This solution is written under the assumption that bfq_queues associated with different actuators cannot be cross-merged. This assumption holds naturally with basic queue merging: the latter is triggered by spatial locality, and sectors for different actuators are not close to each other (apart from the corner case of the last sectors served by a given actuator and the first sectors served by the next actuator). As for stable cross-merging, the assumption here is that it is disabled. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Felici <felicigb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Giulio Barabino <giuliobarabino99@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Emiliano Maccaferri <inbox@emilianomaccaferri.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-5-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated structPaolo Valente1-59/+79
With a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with multiple bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. So, the bfq_io_cq data structure must be able to accommodate its per-queue persistent information for N queues. Currently it stores this information for just one queue, in several scalar fields. This is a preparatory commit for moving to accommodating persistent information for N queues. In particular, this commit packs all the above scalar fields into a single data structure. Then there is now only one field, in bfq_io_cq, that stores all the above information. This scalar field will then be turned into an array by a following commit. Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Giulio Barabino <giuliobarabino99@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Emiliano Maccaferri <inbox@emilianomaccaferri.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-4-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: forbid stable merging of queues associated with different actuatorsPaolo Valente1-4/+9
If queues associated with different actuators are merged, then control is lost on each actuator. Therefore some actuator may be underutilized, and throughput may decrease. This problem cannot occur with basic queue merging, because the latter is triggered by spatial locality, and sectors for different actuators are not close to each other. Yet it may happen with stable merging. To address this issue, this commit prevents stable merging from occurring among queues associated with different actuators. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-3-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-01-30block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basisPaolo Valente1-55/+105
Single-LUN multi-actuator SCSI drives, as well as all multi-actuator SATA drives appear as a single device to the I/O subsystem [1]. Yet they address commands to different actuators internally, as a function of Logical Block Addressing (LBAs). A given sector is reachable by only one of the actuators. For example, Seagate’s Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (SATA) version contains two actuators and maps the lower half of the SATA LBA space to the lower actuator and the upper half to the upper actuator. Evidently, to fully utilize actuators, no actuator must be left idle or underutilized while there is pending I/O for it. The block layer must somehow control the load of each actuator individually. This commit lays the ground for allowing BFQ to provide such a per-actuator control. BFQ associates an I/O-request sync bfq_queue with each process doing synchronous I/O, or with a group of processes, in case of queue merging. Then BFQ serves one bfq_queue at a time. While in service, a bfq_queue is emptied in request-position order. Yet the same process, or group of processes, may generate I/O for different actuators. In this case, different streams of I/O (each for a different actuator) get all inserted into the same sync bfq_queue. So there is basically no individual control on when each stream is served, i.e., on when the I/O requests of the stream are picked from the bfq_queue and dispatched to the drive. This commit enables BFQ to control the service of each actuator individually for synchronous I/O, by simply splitting each sync bfq_queue into N queues, one for each actuator. In other words, a sync bfq_queue is now associated to a pair (process, actuator). As a consequence of this split, the per-queue proportional-share policy implemented by BFQ will guarantee that the sync I/O generated for each actuator, by each process, receives its fair share of service. This is just a preparatory patch. If the I/O of the same process happens to be sent to different queues, then each of these queues may undergo queue merging. To handle this event, the bfq_io_cq data structure must be properly extended. In addition, stable merging must be disabled to avoid loss of control on individual actuators. Finally, also async queues must be split. These issues are described in detail and addressed in next commits. As for this commit, although multiple per-process bfq_queues are provided, the I/O of each process or group of processes is still sent to only one queue, regardless of the actuator the I/O is for. The forwarding to distinct bfq_queues will be enabled after addressing the above issues. [1] https://www.linaro.org/blog/budget-fair-queueing-bfq-linux-io-scheduler-optimizations-for-multi-actuator-sata-hard-drives/ Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Felici <felicigb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Carmine Zaccagnino <carmine@carminezacc.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103145503.71712-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-12-26block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bfq_exit_icq_bfqqYu Kuai1-1/+1
Commit 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") will access 'bic->bfqq' in bic_set_bfqq(), however, bfq_exit_icq_bfqq() can free bfqq first, and then call bic_set_bfqq(), which will cause uaf. Fix the problem by moving bfq_exit_bfqq() behind bic_set_bfqq(). Fixes: 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'") Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221226030605.1437081-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-12-15block, bfq: only do counting of pending-request for BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHEDYuwei Guan1-0/+2
The 'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs' is used when CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is enabled, so let the variables and processes take effect when CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED is enabled. Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@zeekrlife.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221110112622.389332-1-Yuwei.Guan@zeekrlife.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-12-14block, bfq: replace 0/1 with false/true in bic apisYu Kuai1-2/+2
Just to make the code a litter cleaner, there are no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221214033155.3455754-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-12-14block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'Yu Kuai1-1/+6
Our test report a uaf for 'bfqq->bic' in 5.10: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30 CPU: 6 PID: 2318352 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.10.0-60.18.0.50.h602.kasan.eulerosv2r11.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-20220320_160524-szxrtosci10000 04/01/2014 Call Trace: bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30 bfq_dispatch_request+0xe8/0x130 blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x62/0xb0 __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x215/0x2a0 blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x8f/0xd0 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x98/0x180 __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x22b/0x240 blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xe3/0x190 blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x107/0x200 blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x26e/0x3c0 blk_finish_plug+0x63/0x90 __iomap_dio_rw+0x7b5/0x910 iomap_dio_rw+0x36/0x80 ext4_dio_read_iter+0x146/0x190 [ext4] ext4_file_read_iter+0x1e2/0x230 [ext4] new_sync_read+0x29f/0x400 vfs_read+0x24e/0x2d0 ksys_read+0xd5/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6 Commit 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") changes that move process to a new cgroup will allocate a new bfqq to use, however, the old bfqq and new bfqq can point to the same bic: 1) Initial state, two process with io in the same cgroup. Process 1 Process 2 (BIC1) (BIC2) | Λ | Λ | | | | V | V | bfqq1 bfqq2 2) bfqq1 is merged to bfqq2. Process 1 Process 2 (BIC1) (BIC2) | | \-------------\| V bfqq1 bfqq2(coop) 3) Process 1 exit, then issue new io(denoce IOA) from Process 2. (BIC2) | Λ | | V | bfqq2(coop) 4) Before IOA is completed, move Process 2 to another cgroup and issue io. Process 2 (BIC2) Λ |\--------------\ | V bfqq2 bfqq3 Now that BIC2 points to bfqq3, while bfqq2 and bfqq3 both point to BIC2. If all the requests are completed, and Process 2 exit, BIC2 will be freed while there is no guarantee that bfqq2 will be freed before BIC2. Fix the problem by clearing bfqq->bic while bfqq is detached from bic. Fixes: 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221214030430.3304151-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-11-09bfq: ignore oom_bfqq in bfq_check_wakerKhazhismel Kumykov1-1/+3
oom_bfqq is just a fallback bfqq, so shouldn't be used with waker detection. Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221108181030.1611703-2-khazhy@google.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-11-09bfq: fix waker_bfqq inconsistency crashKhazhismel Kumykov1-2/+7
This fixes crashes in bfq_add_bfqq_busy due to waker_bfqq being NULL, but woken_list_node still being hashed. This would happen when bfq_init_rq() expects a brand new allocated queue to be returned from bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split() and unconditionally updates waker_bfqq without resetting woken_list_node. Since we can always return oom_bfqq when attempting to allocate, we cannot assume waker_bfqq starts as NULL. Avoid setting woken_bfqq for oom_bfqq entirely, as it's not useful. Crashes would have a stacktrace like: [160595.656560] bfq_add_bfqq_busy+0x110/0x1ec [160595.661142] bfq_add_request+0x6bc/0x980 [160595.666602] bfq_insert_request+0x8ec/0x1240 [160595.671762] bfq_insert_requests+0x58/0x9c [160595.676420] blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0x11c/0x198 [160595.682107] blk_mq_submit_bio+0x270/0x62c [160595.686759] __submit_bio_noacct_mq+0xec/0x178 [160595.691926] submit_bio+0x120/0x184 [160595.695990] ext4_mpage_readpages+0x77c/0x7c8 [160595.701026] ext4_readpage+0x60/0xb0 [160595.705158] filemap_read_page+0x54/0x114 [160595.711961] filemap_fault+0x228/0x5f4 [160595.716272] do_read_fault+0xe0/0x1f0 [160595.720487] do_fault+0x40/0x1c8 Tested by injecting random failures into bfq_get_queue, crashes go away completely. Fixes: 8ef3fc3a043c ("block, bfq: make shared queues inherit wakers") Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221108181030.1611703-1-khazhy@google.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-11-02block, bfq: remove dead code for updating 'rq_in_driver'Yu Kuai1-16/+0
Such code are not even compiled since they are inside marco "#if 0". Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221102022542.3621219-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-11-01block, bfq: cleanup __bfq_weights_tree_remove()Yu Kuai1-10/+1
It's the same with bfq_weights_tree_remove() now. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-7-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-11-01block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apisYu Kuai1-10/+9
The 'bfq_data' and 'rb_root_cached' can both be accessed through 'bfq_queue', thus only pass 'bfq_queue' as parameter. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-6-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-11-01block, bfq: do not idle if only one group is activatedYu Kuai1-2/+2
Now that root group is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs', 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in bfq_asymmetric_scenario(). Thus change the condition to '> 1'. On the other hand, this change can enable concurrent sync io if only one group is activated. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-11-01block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'Yu Kuai1-42/+0
Currently, bfq can't handle sync io concurrently as long as they are not issued from root group. This is because 'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in bfq_asymmetric_scenario(). The way that bfqg is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs': Before this patch: 1) root group will never be counted. 2) Count if bfqg or it's child bfqgs have pending requests. 3) Don't count if bfqg and it's child bfqgs complete all the requests. After this patch: 1) root group is counted. 2) Count if bfqg have pending requests. 3) Don't count if bfqg complete all the requests. With this change, the occasion that only one group is activated can be detected, and next patch will support concurrent sync io in the occasion. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-11-01block, bfq: support to track if bfqq has pending requestsYu Kuai1-0/+1
If entity belongs to bfqq, then entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs is not used currently. This patch use it to track if bfqq has pending requests through callers of weights_tree insertion and removal. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-10-24blk-wbt: don't enable throttling if default elevator is bfqYu Kuai1-0/+2
Commit b5dc5d4d1f4f ("block,bfq: Disable writeback throttling") tries to disable wbt for bfq, it's done by calling wbt_disable_default() in bfq_init_queue(). However, wbt is still enabled if default elevator is bfq: device_add_disk elevator_init_mq bfq_init_queue wbt_disable_default -> done nothing blk_register_queue wbt_enable_default -> wbt is enabled Fix the problem by adding a new flag ELEVATOR_FLAG_DISBALE_WBT, bfq will set the flag in bfq_init_queue, and following wbt_enable_default() won't enable wbt while the flag is set. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221019121518.3865235-7-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-08-22block, bfq: remove useless parameter for bfq_add/del_bfqq_busy()Yu Kuai1-4/+4
'bfqd' can be accessed through 'bfqq->bfqd', there is no need to pass it as a parameter separately. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816015631.1323948-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-08-22block, bfq: remove useless checking in bfq_put_queue()Yu Kuai1-4/+2
'bfqq->bfqd' is ensured to set in bfq_init_queue(), and it will never change afterwards. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220816015631.1323948-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-07-14block/bfq: Use the new blk_opf_t typeBart Van Assche1-8/+8
Use the new blk_opf_t type for arguments and variables that represent request flags or a bitwise combination of a request operation and request flags. Rename those variables from 'op' into 'opf'. This patch does not change any functionality. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220714180729.1065367-8-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-06-17block/bfq: Enable I/O statisticsBart Van Assche1-0/+3
BFQ uses io_start_time_ns. That member variable is only set if I/O statistics are enabled. Hence this patch that enables I/O statistics at the time BFQ is associated with a request queue. Compile-tested only. Reported-by: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@unisoc.com> Cc: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@unisoc.com> Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Cc: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-06-16blk-mq: avoid to touch q->elevator without any protectionMing Lei1-0/+3
q->elevator is referred in blk_mq_has_sqsched() without any protection, no .q_usage_counter is held, no queue srcu and rcu read lock is held, so potential use-after-free may be triggered. Fix the issue by adding one queue flag for checking if the elevator uses single queue style dispatch. Meantime the elevator feature flag of ELEVATOR_F_MQ_AWARE isn't needed any more. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220616014401.817001-3-ming.lei@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-05-23Merge tag 'for-5.19/block-2022-05-22' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-blockLinus Torvalds1-42/+53
Pull block updates from Jens Axboe: "Here are the core block changes for 5.19. This contains: - blk-throttle accounting fix (Laibin) - Series removing redundant assignments (Michal) - Expose bio cache via the bio_set, so that DM can use it (Mike) - Finish off the bio allocation interface cleanups by dealing with the weirdest member of the family. bio_kmalloc combines a kmalloc for the bio and bio_vecs with a hidden bio_init call and magic cleanup semantics (Christoph) - Clean up the block layer API so that APIs consumed by file systems are (almost) only struct block_device based, so that file systems don't have to poke into block layer internals like the request_queue (Christoph) - Clean up the blk_execute_rq* API (Christoph) - Clean up various lose end in the blk-cgroup code to make it easier to follow in preparation of reworking the blkcg assignment for bios (Christoph) - Fix use-after-free issues in BFQ when processes with merged queues get moved to different cgroups (Jan) - BFQ fixes (Jan) - Various fixes and cleanups (Bart, Chengming, Fanjun, Julia, Ming, Wolfgang, me)" * tag 'for-5.19/block-2022-05-22' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block: (83 commits) blk-mq: fix typo in comment bfq: Remove bfq_requeue_request_body() bfq: Remove superfluous conversion from RQ_BIC() bfq: Allow current waker to defend against a tentative one bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queues blk-cgroup: delete rcu_read_lock_held() WARN_ON_ONCE() blk-throttle: Set BIO_THROTTLED when bio has been throttled blk-cgroup: Remove unnecessary rcu_read_lock/unlock() blk-cgroup: always terminate io.stat lines block, bfq: make bfq_has_work() more accurate block, bfq: protect 'bfqd->queued' by 'bfqd->lock' block: cleanup the VM accounting in submit_bio block: Fix the bio.bi_opf comment block: reorder the REQ_ flags blk-iocost: combine local_stat and desc_stat to stat block: improve the error message from bio_check_eod block: allow passing a NULL bdev to bio_alloc_clone/bio_init_clone block: remove superfluous calls to blkcg_bio_issue_init kthread: unexport kthread_blkcg blk-cgroup: cleanup blkcg_maybe_throttle_current ...
2022-05-19bfq: Remove bfq_requeue_request_body()Jan Kara1-7/+2
The function has only a single caller and two lines. Just remove it since it is pointless and just harming readability. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-4-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-05-19bfq: Remove superfluous conversion from RQ_BIC()Jan Kara1-1/+1
We store struct bfq_io_cq pointer in rq->elv.priv[0] in bfq_init_rq(). Thus a call to icq_to_bic() in RQ_BIC() is wrong. Luckily it does no harm currently because struct io_iq is the first one in struct bfq_io_cq. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-3-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-05-19bfq: Allow current waker to defend against a tentative oneJan Kara1-2/+1
The code in bfq_check_waker() ignores wake up events from the current waker. This makes it more likely we select a new tentative waker although the current one is generating more wake up events. Treat current waker the same way as any other process and allow it to reset the waker detection logic. Fixes: 71217df39dc6 ("block, bfq: make waker-queue detection more robust") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-05-19bfq: Relax waker detection for shared queuesJan Kara1-2/+3
Currently we look for waker only if current queue has no requests. This makes sense for bfq queues with a single process however for shared queues when there is a larger number of processes the condition that queue has no requests is difficult to meet because often at least one process has some request in flight although all the others are waiting for the waker to do the work and this harms throughput. Relax the "no queued request for bfq queue" condition to "the current task has no queued requests yet". For this, we also need to start tracking number of requests in flight for each task. This patch (together with the following one) restores the performance for dbench with 128 clients that regressed with commit c65e6fd460b4 ("bfq: Do not let waker requests skip proper accounting") because this commit makes requests of wakers properly enter BFQ queues and thus these queues become ineligible for the old waker detection logic. Dbench results: Vanilla 5.18-rc3 5.18-rc3 + revert 5.18-rc3 patched Mean 1237.36 ( 0.00%) 950.16 * 23.21%* 988.35 * 20.12%* Numbers are time to complete workload so lower is better. Fixes: c65e6fd460b4 ("bfq: Do not let waker requests skip proper accounting") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-05-16block, bfq: make bfq_has_work() more accurateYu Kuai1-4/+12
bfq_has_work() is using busy_queues currently, which is not accurate because bfq_queue is busy doesn't represent that it has requests. Since bfqd aready has a counter 'queued' to record how many requests are in bfq, use it instead of busy_queues. Noted that bfq_has_work() can be called with 'bfqd->lock' held, thus the lock can't be held in bfq_has_work() to protect 'bfqd->queued'. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513023507.2625717-3-yukuai3@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-05-16block, bfq: protect 'bfqd->queued' by 'bfqd->lock'Yu Kuai1-1/+3
If bfq_schedule_dispatch() is called from bfq_idle_slice_timer_body(), then 'bfqd->queued' is read without holding 'bfqd->lock'. This is wrong since it can be wrote concurrently. Fix the problem by holding 'bfqd->lock' in such case. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513023507.2625717-2-yukuai3@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-29bfq: Fix warning in bfqq_request_over_limit()Jan Kara1-3/+9
People are occasionally reporting a warning bfqq_request_over_limit() triggering reporting that BFQ's idea of cgroup hierarchy (and its depth) does not match what generic blkcg code thinks. This can actually happen when bfqq gets moved between BFQ groups while bfqq_request_over_limit() is running. Make sure the code is safe against BFQ queue being moved to a different BFQ group. Fixes: 76f1df88bbc2 ("bfq: Limit number of requests consumed by each cgroup") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJCQCtTw_2C7ZSz7as5Gvq=OmnDiio=HRkQekqWpKot84sQhFA@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Reported-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220407140738.9723-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-18bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usageJan Kara1-10/+1
BFQ usage of __bio_blkcg() is a relict from the past. Furthermore if bio would not be associated with any blkcg, the usage of __bio_blkcg() in BFQ is prone to races with the task being migrated between cgroups as __bio_blkcg() calls at different places could return different blkcgs. Convert BFQ to the new situation where bio->bi_blkg is initialized in bio_set_dev() and thus practically always valid. This allows us to save blkcg_gq lookup and noticeably simplify the code. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0fe061b9f03c ("blkcg: fix ref count issue with bio_blkcg() using task_css") Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-8-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-18bfq: Remove pointless bfq_init_rq() callsJan Kara1-6/+6
We call bfq_init_rq() from request merging functions where requests we get should have already gone through bfq_init_rq() during insert and anyway we want to do anything only if the request is already tracked by BFQ. So replace calls to bfq_init_rq() with RQ_BFQQ() instead to simply skip requests untracked by BFQ. We move bfq_init_rq() call in bfq_insert_request() a bit earlier to cover request merging and thus can transfer FIFO position in case of a merge. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-6-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-18bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pairJan Kara1-3/+0
In bfq_insert_request() we unlock bfqd->lock only to call trace_block_rq_insert() and then lock bfqd->lock again. This is really pointless since tracing is disabled if we really care about performance and even if the tracepoint is enabled, it is a quick call. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-5-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-18bfq: Update cgroup information before merging bioJan Kara1-2/+9
When the process is migrated to a different cgroup (or in case of writeback just starts submitting bios associated with a different cgroup) bfq_merge_bio() can operate with stale cgroup information in bic. Thus the bio can be merged to a request from a different cgroup or it can result in merging of bfqqs for different cgroups or bfqqs of already dead cgroups and causing possible use-after-free issues. Fix the problem by updating cgroup information in bfq_merge_bio(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e21b7a0b9887 ("block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support") Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-4-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-18bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroupsJan Kara1-1/+1
When bfqq is shared by multiple processes it can happen that one of the processes gets moved to a different cgroup (or just starts submitting IO for different cgroup). In case that happens we need to split the merged bfqq as otherwise we will have IO for multiple cgroups in one bfqq and we will just account IO time to wrong entities etc. Similarly if the bfqq is scheduled to merge with another bfqq but the merge didn't happen yet, cancel the merge as it need not be valid anymore. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e21b7a0b9887 ("block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support") Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-3-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-18bfq: Avoid merging queues with different parentsJan Kara1-0/+8
It can happen that the parent of a bfqq changes between the moment we decide two queues are worth to merge (and set bic->stable_merge_bfqq) and the moment bfq_setup_merge() is called. This can happen e.g. because the process submitted IO for a different cgroup and thus bfqq got reparented. It can even happen that the bfqq we are merging with has parent cgroup that is already offline and going to be destroyed in which case the merge can lead to use-after-free issues such as: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __bfq_deactivate_entity+0x9cb/0xa50 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800693c0c0 by task runc:[2:INIT]/10544 CPU: 0 PID: 10544 Comm: runc:[2:INIT] Tainted: G E 5.15.2-0.g5fb85fd-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) f1f3b891c72369aebecd2e43e4641a6358867c70 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x46/0x5a print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x140 ? __bfq_deactivate_entity+0x9cb/0xa50 kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x11b ? __bfq_deactivate_entity+0x9cb/0xa50 __bfq_deactivate_entity+0x9cb/0xa50 ? update_curr+0x32f/0x5d0 bfq_deactivate_entity+0xa0/0x1d0 bfq_del_bfqq_busy+0x28a/0x420 ? resched_curr+0x116/0x1d0 ? bfq_requeue_bfqq+0x70/0x70 ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x52b/0xbc0 __bfq_bfqq_expire+0x1a2/0x270 bfq_bfqq_expire+0xd16/0x2160 ? try_to_wake_up+0x4ee/0x1260 ? bfq_end_wr_async_queues+0xe0/0xe0 ? _raw_write_unlock_bh+0x60/0x60 ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x81/0xe0 bfq_idle_slice_timer+0x109/0x280 ? bfq_dispatch_request+0x4870/0x4870 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x37d/0x700 ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0xd/0x10 ? ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x6f/0x280 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2c8/0x740 Fix the problem by checking that the parent of the two bfqqs we are merging in bfq_setup_merge() is the same. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20211125172809.GC19572@quack2.suse.cz/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 430a67f9d616 ("block, bfq: merge bursts of newly-created queues") Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-04-18bfq: Avoid false marking of bic as stably mergedJan Kara1-3/+6
bfq_setup_cooperator() can mark bic as stably merged even though it decides to not merge its bfqqs (when bfq_setup_merge() returns NULL). Make sure to mark bic as stably merged only if we are really going to merge bfqqs. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> Fixes: 430a67f9d616 ("block, bfq: merge bursts of newly-created queues") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220401102752.8599-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2022-03-23Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
Merge updates from Andrew Morton: - A few misc subsystems: kthread, scripts, ntfs, ocfs2, block, and vfs - Most the MM patches which precede the patches in Willy's tree: kasan, pagecache, gup, swap, shmem, memcg, selftests, pagemap, mremap, sparsemem, vmalloc, pagealloc, memory-failure, mlock, hugetlb, userfaultfd, vmscan, compaction, mempolicy, oom-kill, migration, thp, cma, autonuma, psi, ksm, page-poison, madvise, memory-hotplug, rmap, zswap, uaccess, ioremap, highmem, cleanups, kfence, hmm, and damon. * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: (227 commits) mm/damon/sysfs: remove repeat container_of() in damon_sysfs_kdamond_release() Docs/ABI/testing: add DAMON sysfs interface ABI document Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document DAMON sysfs interface selftests/damon: add a test for DAMON sysfs interface mm/damon/sysfs: support DAMOS stats mm/damon/sysfs: support DAMOS watermarks mm/damon/sysfs: support schemes prioritization mm/damon/sysfs: support DAMOS quotas mm/damon/sysfs: support DAMON-based Operation Schemes mm/damon/sysfs: support the physical address space monitoring mm/damon/sysfs: link DAMON for virtual address spaces monitoring mm/damon: implement a minimal stub for sysfs-based DAMON interface mm/damon/core: add number of each enum type values mm/damon/core: allow non-exclusive DAMON start/stop Docs/damon: update outdated term 'regions update interval' Docs/vm/damon/design: update DAMON-Idle Page Tracking interference handling Docs/vm/damon: call low level monitoring primitives the operations mm/damon: remove unnecessary CONFIG_DAMON option mm/damon/paddr,vaddr: remove damon_{p,v}a_{target_valid,set_operations}() mm/damon/dbgfs-test: fix is_target_id() change ...