summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-04-01x86: start using named parameters for low-level uaccess asmsLinus Torvalds1-11/+15
This is partly for readability - using named arguments instead of numbered ones makes it muchmore obvious just what is going on. Using "%[efault]" instead of "%4" for the special -EFAULT constant just means that you don't have to count the arguments to see what's up. But the motivation for all this cleanup is that when we'll start to conditionally use "asm goto" even for the __get_user_asm() case, the argument numbers will depend on whether we have an error output, or an error label we can just directly jump to. So this moves us towards named arguments for the same reason that we have to use named arguments for the asms that use SET_CC(): numbering will eventually become similarly unreliable and depends on whether we can use particular compiler features or not. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: get rid of 'rtype' argument to __get_user_asm() macroLinus Torvalds1-11/+17
This is the exact same thing as 3680785692fb ("x86: get rid of 'rtype' argument to __put_user_goto() macro") except it's about __get_user_asm() rather than __put_user_goto(). The reasons are the same: having the low-level asm access the argument with a different size than the compiler thinks it does is fundamentally wrong. But unlike the __put_user_goto() case, we actually did tell the compiler that we used a bigger variable (either long or long long), and then only filled in the low bits, and ended up "fixing" this by casting the result to the proper pointer type. That's because we needed to use a non-qualified type (the user pointer might be a const pointer!), and that makes this a bit more painful. Our '__inttype()' macro used to be lazy and only differentiate between "fits in a register" or "needs two registers". So this fix had to also make that '__inttype()' macro more precise. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: get rid of 'rtype' argument to __put_user_goto() macroLinus Torvalds1-7/+7
The 'rtype' argument goes back to pre-git (and pre-BK) times, and comes from the fact that we used to not necessarily have the same type sizes for the arguments of the inline asm as we did for the actual accesses we did. So 'rtype' is the 'register type' - the override of the register size in the inline asm when it doesn't match the actual size of the variable we use as the output argument (for when you used "put_user()" on an "int" value that was assigned to a byte-sized user space access etc). That mismatch doesn't actually exist any more, and should probably never have existed in the first place. It's a horrid bug just waiting to happen (using more - or less - of the variable that the compiler expected us to use). I think we had some odd casting going on to hide the effects of that oddity after-the-fact, but those are long gone, and these days we should always have the right size value in the first place, using things like __typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x); and gcc should thus have the right register size without any manual 'rtype' games. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: get rid of 'errret' argument to __get_user_xyz() macrossLinus Torvalds1-15/+15
Every remaining user just has the error case returning -EFAULT. In fact, the exception was __get_user_asm_nozero(), which was removed in commit 4b842e4e25b1 ("x86: get rid of small constant size cases in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()"), and the other __get_user_xyz() macros just followed suit for consistency. Fix up some macro whitespace while at it. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: remove __put_user_asm() infrastructureLinus Torvalds1-11/+0
The last user was removed by commit 4b842e4e25b1 ("x86: get rid of small constant size cases in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()"). Get rid of the left-overs before somebody tries to use it again. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-31Merge branch 'x86-cleanups-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-140/+0
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 cleanups from Ingo Molnar: "This topic tree contains more commits than usual: - most of it are uaccess cleanups/reorganization by Al - there's a bunch of prototype declaration (--Wmissing-prototypes) cleanups - misc other cleanups all around the map" * 'x86-cleanups-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (36 commits) x86/mm/set_memory: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings x86/efi: Add a prototype for efi_arch_mem_reserve() x86/mm: Mark setup_emu2phys_nid() static x86/jump_label: Move 'inline' keyword placement x86/platform/uv: Add a missing prototype for uv_bau_message_interrupt() kill uaccess_try() x86: unsafe_put-style macro for sigmask x86: x32_setup_rt_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: __setup_rt_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: __setup_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: setup_sigcontext(): list user_access_{begin,end}() into callers x86: get rid of put_user_try in __setup_rt_frame() (both 32bit and 64bit) x86: ia32_setup_rt_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: ia32_setup_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: ia32_setup_sigcontext(): lift user_access_{begin,end}() into the callers x86/alternatives: Mark text_poke_loc_init() static x86/cpu: Fix a -Wmissing-prototypes warning for init_ia32_feat_ctl() x86/mm: Drop pud_mknotpresent() x86: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() x86/configs: Slightly reduce defconfigs ...
2020-03-28x86: get rid of user_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic()Al Viro1-93/+0
Only one user left; the thing had been made polymorphic back in 2013 for the sake of MPX. No point keeping it now that MPX is gone. Convert futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() to user_access_{begin,end}() while we are at it. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-03-26kill uaccess_try()Al Viro1-65/+0
finally Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-03-19x86: kill get_user_{try,catch,ex}Al Viro1-54/+0
no users left Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-03-18x86: get rid of small constant size cases in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()Al Viro1-12/+0
Very few call sites where that would be triggered remain, and none of those is anywhere near hot enough to bother. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-02-16x86 user stack frame reads: switch to explicit __get_user()Al Viro1-9/+0
rather than relying upon the magic in raw_copy_from_user() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2019-10-07uaccess: implement a proper unsafe_copy_to_user() and switch filldir over to itLinus Torvalds1-0/+23
In commit 9f79b78ef744 ("Convert filldir[64]() from __put_user() to unsafe_put_user()") I made filldir() use unsafe_put_user(), which improves code generation on x86 enormously. But because we didn't have a "unsafe_copy_to_user()", the dirent name copy was also done by hand with unsafe_put_user() in a loop, and it turns out that a lot of other architectures didn't like that, because unlike x86, they have various alignment issues. Most non-x86 architectures trap and fix it up, and some (like xtensa) will just fail unaligned put_user() accesses unconditionally. Which makes that "copy using put_user() in a loop" not work for them at all. I could make that code do explicit alignment etc, but the architectures that don't like unaligned accesses also don't really use the fancy "user_access_begin/end()" model, so they might just use the regular old __copy_to_user() interface. So this commit takes that looping implementation, turns it into the x86 version of "unsafe_copy_to_user()", and makes other architectures implement the unsafe copy version as __copy_to_user() (the same way they do for the other unsafe_xyz() accessor functions). Note that it only does this for the copying _to_ user space, and we still don't have a unsafe version of copy_from_user(). That's partly because we have no current users of it, but also partly because the copy_from_user() case is slightly different and cannot efficiently be implemented in terms of a unsafe_get_user() loop (because gcc can't do asm goto with outputs). It would be trivial to do this using "rep movsb", which would work really nicely on newer x86 cores, but really badly on some older ones. Al Viro is looking at cleaning up all our user copy routines to make this all a non-issue, but for now we have this simple-but-stupid version for x86 that works fine for the dirent name copy case because those names are short strings and we simply don't need anything fancier. Fixes: 9f79b78ef744 ("Convert filldir[64]() from __put_user() to unsafe_put_user()") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-02x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flags into __get_user() argument evaluationPeter Zijlstra1-1/+3
Identical to __put_user(); the __get_user() argument evalution will too leak UBSAN crud into the __uaccess_begin() / __uaccess_end() region. While uncommon this was observed to happen for: drivers/xen/gntdev.c: if (__get_user(old_status, batch->status[i])) where UBSAN added array bound checking. This complements commit: 6ae865615fc4 ("x86/uaccess: Dont leak the AC flag into __put_user() argument evaluation") Tested-by Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: broonie@kernel.org Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: mhocko@suse.cz Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190829082445.GM2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2019-05-26x86/uaccess: Allow access_ok() in irq context if pagefault_disabledMasami Hiramatsu1-1/+3
WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() assumes that the access_ok() and following user memory access can sleep. But this assumption is not always correct; when the pagefault is disabled, following memory access will just returns -EFAULT and never sleep. Add pagefault_disabled() check in WARN_ON_ONCE() so that it can ignore the case we call it with disabling pagefault. For this purpose, this modified pagefault_disabled() as an inline function. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/155789868664.26965.7932665824135793317.stgit@devnote2 Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2019-05-07Merge branch 'x86-asm-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 asm updates from Ingo Molnar: "This includes the following changes: - cpu_has() cleanups - sync_bitops.h modernization to the rmwcc.h facility, similarly to bitops.h - continued LTO annotations/fixes - misc cleanups and smaller cleanups" * 'x86-asm-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/um/vdso: Drop unnecessary cc-ldoption x86/vdso: Rename variable to fix -Wshadow warning x86/cpu/amd: Exclude 32bit only assembler from 64bit build x86/asm: Mark all top level asm statements as .text x86/build/vdso: Add FORCE to the build rule of %.so x86/asm: Modernize sync_bitops.h x86/mm: Convert some slow-path static_cpu_has() callers to boot_cpu_has() x86: Convert some slow-path static_cpu_has() callers to boot_cpu_has() x86/asm: Clarify static_cpu_has()'s intended use x86/uaccess: Fix implicit cast of __user pointer x86/cpufeature: Remove __pure attribute to _static_cpu_has()
2019-04-24x86/uaccess: Dont leak the AC flag into __put_user() argument evaluationPeter Zijlstra1-3/+4
The __put_user() macro evaluates it's @ptr argument inside the __uaccess_begin() / __uaccess_end() region. While this would normally not be expected to be an issue, an UBSAN bug (it ignored -fwrapv, fixed in GCC 8+) would transform the @ptr evaluation for: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: if (unlikely(__put_user(offset, &urelocs[r-stack].presumed_offset))) { into a signed-overflow-UB check and trigger the objtool AC validation. Finish this commit: 2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation") and explicitly evaluate all 3 arguments early. Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: luto@kernel.org Fixes: 2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190424072208.695962771@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-03x86/uaccess: Fix implicit cast of __user pointerJann Horn1-2/+1
The first two arguments of __user_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() are: - @uval is a kernel pointer into which the old value should be stored - @ptr is the user pointer on which the cmpxchg should operate This means that casting @uval to __typeof__(ptr) is wrong. Since @uval is only used once inside the macro, just get rid of __uval and use (uval) directly. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190329214652.258477-4-jannh@google.com
2019-04-03x86/uaccess: Introduce user_access_{save,restore}()Peter Zijlstra1-0/+3
Introduce common helpers for when we need to safely suspend a uaccess section; for instance to generate a {KA,UB}SAN report. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-03x86/uaccess: Always inline user_access_begin()Peter Zijlstra1-1/+1
If GCC out-of-lines it, the STAC and CLAC are in different fuctions and objtool gets upset. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-03-08Merge branch 'x86-cleanups-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-3/+0
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 cleanups from Ingo Molnar: "Various cleanups and simplifications, none of them really stands out, they are all over the place" * 'x86-cleanups-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/uaccess: Remove unused __addr_ok() macro x86/smpboot: Remove unused phys_id variable x86/mm/dump_pagetables: Remove the unused prev_pud variable x86/fpu: Move init_xstate_size() to __init section x86/cpu_entry_area: Move percpu_setup_debug_store() to __init section x86/mtrr: Remove unused variable x86/boot/compressed/64: Explain paging_prepare()'s return value x86/resctrl: Remove duplicate MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL definition x86/asm/suspend: Drop ENTRY from local data x86/hw_breakpoints, kprobes: Remove kprobes ifdeffery x86/boot: Save several bytes in decompressor x86/trap: Remove useless declaration x86/mm/tlb: Remove unused cpu variable x86/events: Mark expected switch-case fall-throughs x86/asm-prototypes: Remove duplicate include <asm/page.h> x86/kernel: Mark expected switch-case fall-throughs x86/insn-eval: Mark expected switch-case fall-through x86/platform/UV: Replace kmalloc() and memset() with k[cz]alloc() calls x86/e820: Replace kmalloc() + memcpy() with kmemdup()
2019-03-06docs/core-api/mm: fix user memory accessors formattingMike Rapoport1-12/+12
The descriptions of userspace memory access functions had minor issues with formatting that made kernel-doc unable to properly detect the function/macro names and the return value sections: ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:80: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:139: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:231: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:505: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:530: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c:58: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c:69: warning: No description found for return value of 'clear_user' ./arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c:78: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c:90: warning: No description found for return value of '__clear_user' Fix the formatting. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1549549644-4903-3-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-04get rid of legacy 'get_ds()' functionLinus Torvalds1-1/+0
Every in-kernel use of this function defined it to KERNEL_DS (either as an actual define, or as an inline function). It's an entirely historical artifact, and long long long ago used to actually read the segment selector valueof '%ds' on x86. Which in the kernel is always KERNEL_DS. Inspired by a patch from Jann Horn that just did this for a very small subset of users (the ones in fs/), along with Al who suggested a script. I then just took it to the logical extreme and removed all the remaining gunk. Roughly scripted with git grep -l '(get_ds())' -- :^tools/ | xargs sed -i 's/(get_ds())/(KERNEL_DS)/' git grep -lw 'get_ds' -- :^tools/ | xargs sed -i '/^#define get_ds()/d' plus manual fixups to remove a few unusual usage patterns, the couple of inline function cases and to fix up a comment that had become stale. The 'get_ds()' function remains in an x86 kvm selftest, since in user space it actually does something relevant. Inspired-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Inspired-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-02Merge branch 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+4
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "Two last minute fixes: - Prevent value evaluation via functions happening in the user access enabled region of __put_user() (put another way: make sure to evaluate the value to be stored in user space _before_ enabling user space accesses) - Correct the definition of a Hyper-V hypercall constant" * 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/hyper-v: Fix definition of HV_MAX_FLUSH_REP_COUNT x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation
2019-02-26x86/uaccess: Remove unused __addr_ok() macroBorislav Petkov1-3/+0
This was caught while staring at the whole {set,get}_fs() machinery. It's last user, the 32-bit version of strnlen_user() went away with 5723aa993d83 ("x86: use the new generic strnlen_user() function") so drop it. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org> Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190225191109.7671-1-bp@alien8.de
2019-02-25x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluationAndy Lutomirski1-2/+4
When calling __put_user(foo(), ptr), the __put_user() macro would call foo() in between __uaccess_begin() and __uaccess_end(). If that code were buggy, then those bugs would be run without SMAP protection. Fortunately, there seem to be few instances of the problem in the kernel. Nevertheless, __put_user() should be fixed to avoid doing this. Therefore, evaluate __put_user()'s argument before setting AC. This issue was noticed when an objtool hack by Peter Zijlstra complained about genregs_get() and I compared the assembly output to the C source. [ bp: Massage commit message and fixed up whitespace. ] Fixes: 11f1a4b9755f ("x86: reorganize SMAP handling in user space accesses") Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190225125231.845656645@infradead.org
2019-01-20x86: uaccess: Inhibit speculation past access_ok() in user_access_begin()Will Deacon1-1/+1
Commit 594cc251fdd0 ("make 'user_access_begin()' do 'access_ok()'") makes the access_ok() check part of the user_access_begin() preceding a series of 'unsafe' accesses. This has the desirable effect of ensuring that all 'unsafe' accesses have been range-checked, without having to pick through all of the callsites to verify whether the appropriate checking has been made. However, the consolidated range check does not inhibit speculation, so it is still up to the caller to ensure that they are not susceptible to any speculative side-channel attacks for user addresses that ultimately fail the access_ok() check. This is an oversight, so use __uaccess_begin_nospec() to ensure that speculation is inhibited until the access_ok() check has passed. Reported-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-05Use __put_user_goto in __put_user_size() and unsafe_put_user()Linus Torvalds1-31/+22
This actually enables the __put_user_goto() functionality in unsafe_put_user(). For an example of the effect of this, this is the code generated for the unsafe_put_user(signo, &infop->si_signo, Efault); in the waitid() system call: movl %ecx,(%rbx) # signo, MEM[(struct __large_struct *)_2] It's just one single store instruction, along with generating an exception table entry pointing to the Efault label case in case that instruction faults. Before, we would generate this: xorl %edx, %edx movl %ecx,(%rbx) # signo, MEM[(struct __large_struct *)_3] testl %edx, %edx jne .L309 with the exception table generated for that 'mov' instruction causing us to jump to a stub that set %edx to -EFAULT and then jumped back to the 'testl' instruction. So not only do we now get rid of the extra code in the normal sequence, we also avoid unnecessarily keeping that extra error register live across it all. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-05x86 uaccess: Introduce __put_user_gotoLinus Torvalds1-11/+17
This is finally the actual reason for the odd error handling in the "unsafe_get/put_user()" functions, introduced over three years ago. Using a "jump to error label" interface is somewhat odd, but very convenient as a programming interface, and more importantly, it fits very well with simply making the target be the exception handler address directly from the inline asm. The reason it took over three years to actually do this? We need "asm goto" support for it, which only became the default on x86 last year. It's now been a year that we've forced asm goto support (see commit e501ce957a78 "x86: Force asm-goto"), and so let's just do it here too. [ Side note: this commit was originally done back in 2016. The above commentary about timing is obviously about it only now getting merged into my real upstream tree - Linus ] Sadly, gcc still only supports "asm goto" with asms that do not have any outputs, so we are limited to only the put_user case for this. Maybe in several more years we can do the get_user case too. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04make 'user_access_begin()' do 'access_ok()'Linus Torvalds1-1/+8
Originally, the rule used to be that you'd have to do access_ok() separately, and then user_access_begin() before actually doing the direct (optimized) user access. But experience has shown that people then decide not to do access_ok() at all, and instead rely on it being implied by other operations or similar. Which makes it very hard to verify that the access has actually been range-checked. If you use the unsafe direct user accesses, hardware features (either SMAP - Supervisor Mode Access Protection - on x86, or PAN - Privileged Access Never - on ARM) do force you to use user_access_begin(). But nothing really forces the range check. By putting the range check into user_access_begin(), we actually force people to do the right thing (tm), and the range check vill be visible near the actual accesses. We have way too long a history of people trying to avoid them. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() functionLinus Torvalds1-5/+2
Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand. It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact. A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's just get this done once and for all. This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form. There were a couple of notable cases: - csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias. - the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing really used it) - microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch. I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-09-03x86/extable: Introduce _ASM_EXTABLE_UA for uaccess fixupsJann Horn1-11/+11
Currently, most fixups for attempting to access userspace memory are handled using _ASM_EXTABLE, which is also used for various other types of fixups (e.g. safe MSR access, IRET failures, and a bunch of other things). In order to make it possible to add special safety checks to uaccess fixups (in particular, checking whether the fault address is actually in userspace), introduce a new exception table handler ex_handler_uaccess() and wire it up to all the user access fixups (excluding ones that already use _ASM_EXTABLE_EX). Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: dvyukov@google.com Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180828201421.157735-5-jannh@google.com
2018-01-30x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospecDan Williams1-3/+3
Quoting Linus: I do think that it would be a good idea to very expressly document the fact that it's not that the user access itself is unsafe. I do agree that things like "get_user()" want to be protected, but not because of any direct bugs or problems with get_user() and friends, but simply because get_user() is an excellent source of a pointer that is obviously controlled from a potentially attacking user space. So it's a prime candidate for then finding _subsequent_ accesses that can then be used to perturb the cache. __uaccess_begin_nospec() covers __get_user() and copy_from_iter() where the limit check is far away from the user pointer de-reference. In those cases a barrier_nospec() prevents speculation with a potential pointer to privileged memory. uaccess_try_nospec covers get_user_try. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: alan@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2018-01-30x86: Introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospecDan Williams1-0/+9
For __get_user() paths, do not allow the kernel to speculate on the value of a user controlled pointer. In addition to the 'stac' instruction for Supervisor Mode Access Protection (SMAP), a barrier_nospec() causes the access_ok() result to resolve in the pipeline before the CPU might take any speculative action on the pointer value. Given the cost of 'stac' the speculation barrier is placed after 'stac' to hopefully overlap the cost of disabling SMAP with the cost of flushing the instruction pipeline. Since __get_user is a major kernel interface that deals with user controlled pointers, the __uaccess_begin_nospec() mechanism will prevent speculative execution past an access_ok() permission check. While speculative execution past access_ok() is not enough to lead to a kernel memory leak, it is a necessary precondition. To be clear, __uaccess_begin_nospec() is addressing a class of potential problems near __get_user() usages. Note, that while the barrier_nospec() in __uaccess_begin_nospec() is used to protect __get_user(), pointer masking similar to array_index_nospec() will be used for get_user() since it incorporates a bounds check near the usage. uaccess_try_nospec provides the same mechanism for get_user_try. No functional changes. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: alan@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727415922.33451.5796614273104346583.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2017-11-02License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman1-0/+1
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-09-25x86: Don't cast away the __user in __get_user_asm_u64()Ville Syrjälä1-1/+1
Don't cast away the __user in __get_user_asm_u64() on x86-32. Prevents sparse getting upset. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170912164000.13745-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2017-09-23x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for ClangJosh Poimboeuf1-2/+2
For inline asm statements which have a CALL instruction, we list the stack pointer as a constraint to convince GCC to ensure the frame pointer is set up first: static inline void foo() { register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP); asm("call bar" : "+r" (__sp)) } Unfortunately, that pattern causes Clang to corrupt the stack pointer. The fix is easy: convert the stack pointer register variable to a global variable. It should be noted that the end result is different based on the GCC version. With GCC 6.4, this patch has exactly the same result as before: defconfig defconfig-nofp distro distro-nofp before 9820389 9491555 8816046 8516940 after 9820389 9491555 8816046 8516940 With GCC 7.2, however, GCC's behavior has changed. It now changes its behavior based on the conversion of the register variable to a global. That somehow convinces it to *always* set up the frame pointer before inserting *any* inline asm. (Therefore, listing the variable as an output constraint is a no-op and is no longer necessary.) It's a bit overkill, but the performance impact should be negligible. And in fact, there's a nice improvement with frame pointers disabled: defconfig defconfig-nofp distro distro-nofp before 9796316 9468236 9076191 8790305 after 9796957 9464267 9076381 8785949 So in summary, while listing the stack pointer as an output constraint is no longer necessary for newer versions of GCC, it's still needed for older versions. Suggested-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Reported-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Miguel Bernal Marin <miguel.bernal.marin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3db862e970c432ae823cf515c52b54fec8270e0e.1505942196.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-09-04Merge branch 'x86-syscall-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+6
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull syscall updates from Ingo Molnar: "Improve the security of set_fs(): we now check the address limit on a number of key platforms (x86, arm, arm64) before returning to user-space - without adding overhead to the typical system call fast path" * 'x86-syscall-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: arm64/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return arm/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return x86/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return
2017-07-15Merge branch 'work.uaccess-unaligned' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-3/+0
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs Pull uacess-unaligned removal from Al Viro: "That stuff had just one user, and an exotic one, at that - binfmt_flat on arm and m68k" * 'work.uaccess-unaligned' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: kill {__,}{get,put}_user_unaligned() binfmt_flat: flat_{get,put}_addr_from_rp() should be able to fail
2017-07-08x86/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode returnThomas Garnier1-1/+6
Ensure the address limit is a user-mode segment before returning to user-mode. Otherwise a process can corrupt kernel-mode memory and elevate privileges [1]. The set_fs function sets the TIF_SETFS flag to force a slow path on return. In the slow path, the address limit is checked to be USER_DS if needed. The addr_limit_user_check function is added as a cross-architecture function to check the address limit. [1] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=990 Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170615011203.144108-1-thgarnie@google.com
2017-07-07Merge branch 'uaccess.strlen' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+0
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs Pull user access str* updates from Al Viro: "uaccess str...() dead code removal" * 'uaccess.strlen' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: s390 keyboard.c: don't open-code strndup_user() mips: get rid of unused __strnlen_user() get rid of unused __strncpy_from_user() instances kill strlen_user()
2017-07-04kill {__,}{get,put}_user_unaligned()Al Viro1-3/+0
no users left Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-05-22x86: fix 32-bit case of __get_user_asm_u64()Linus Torvalds1-3/+3
The code to fetch a 64-bit value from user space was entirely buggered, and has been since the code was merged in early 2016 in commit b2f680380ddf ("x86/mm/32: Add support for 64-bit __get_user() on 32-bit kernels"). Happily the buggered routine is almost certainly entirely unused, since the normal way to access user space memory is just with the non-inlined "get_user()", and the inlined version didn't even historically exist. The normal "get_user()" case is handled by external hand-written asm in arch/x86/lib/getuser.S that doesn't have either of these issues. There were two independent bugs in __get_user_asm_u64(): - it still did the STAC/CLAC user space access marking, even though that is now done by the wrapper macros, see commit 11f1a4b9755f ("x86: reorganize SMAP handling in user space accesses"). This didn't result in a semantic error, it just means that the inlined optimized version was hugely less efficient than the allegedly slower standard version, since the CLAC/STAC overhead is quite high on modern Intel CPU's. - the double register %eax/%edx was marked as an output, but the %eax part of it was touched early in the asm, and could thus clobber other inputs to the asm that gcc didn't expect it to touch. In particular, that meant that the generated code could look like this: mov (%eax),%eax mov 0x4(%eax),%edx where the load of %edx obviously was _supposed_ to be from the 32-bit word that followed the source of %eax, but because %eax was overwritten by the first instruction, the source of %edx was basically random garbage. The fixes are trivial: remove the extraneous STAC/CLAC entries, and mark the 64-bit output as early-clobber to let gcc know that no inputs should alias with the output register. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v4.8+ Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-22Clean up x86 unsafe_get/put_user() type handlingLinus Torvalds1-2/+3
Al noticed that unsafe_put_user() had type problems, and fixed them in commit a7cc722fff0b ("fix unsafe_put_user()"), which made me look more at those functions. It turns out that unsafe_get_user() had a type issue too: it limited the largest size of the type it could handle to "unsigned long". Which is fine with the current users, but doesn't match our existing normal get_user() semantics, which can also handle "u64" even when that does not fit in a long. While at it, also clean up the type cast in unsafe_put_user(). We actually want to just make it an assignment to the expected type of the pointer, because we actually do want warnings from types that don't convert silently. And it makes the code more readable by not having that one very long and complex line. [ This patch might become stable material if we ever end up back-porting any new users of the unsafe uaccess code, but as things stand now this doesn't matter for any current existing uses. ] Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-21fix unsafe_put_user()Al Viro1-1/+1
__put_user_size() relies upon its first argument having the same type as what the second one points to; the only other user makes sure of that and unsafe_put_user() should do the same. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-05-16kill strlen_user()Al Viro1-1/+0
no callers, no consistent semantics, no sane way to use it... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-29x86: switch to RAW_COPY_USERAl Viro1-53/+0
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-29amd64: get rid of zeroingAl Viro1-0/+12
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-06uaccess: drop duplicate includes from asm/uaccess.hAl Viro1-2/+0
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-06uaccess: move VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} definitions to linux/uaccess.hAl Viro1-3/+0
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2016-12-06x86/uaccess, sched/preempt: Verify access_ok() contextPeter Zijlstra1-2/+11
I recently encountered wreckage because access_ok() was used where it should not be, add an explicit WARN when access_ok() is used wrongly. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>