summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-07-29x86: drop bogus "cc" clobber from __try_cmpxchg_user_asm()Jan Beulich1-1/+1
commit 1df931d95f4dc1c11db1123e85d4e08156e46ef9 upstream. As noted (and fixed) a couple of times in the past, "=@cc<cond>" outputs and clobbering of "cc" don't work well together. The compiler appears to mean to reject such, but doesn't - in its upstream form - quite manage to yet for "cc". Furthermore two similar macros don't clobber "cc", and clobbering "cc" is pointless in asm()-s for x86 anyway - the compiler always assumes status flags to be clobbered there. Fixes: 989b5db215a2 ("x86/uaccess: Implement macros for CMPXCHG on user addresses") Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Message-Id: <485c0c0b-a3a7-0b7c-5264-7d00c01de032@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-29x86/uaccess: Implement macros for CMPXCHG on user addressesPeter Zijlstra1-0/+142
[ Upstream commit 989b5db215a2f22f89d730b607b071d964780f10 ] Add support for CMPXCHG loops on userspace addresses. Provide both an "unsafe" version for tight loops that do their own uaccess begin/end, as well as a "safe" version for use cases where the CMPXCHG is not buried in a loop, e.g. KVM will resume the guest instead of looping when emulation of a guest atomic accesses fails the CMPXCHG. Provide 8-byte versions for 32-bit kernels so that KVM can do CMPXCHG on guest PAE PTEs, which are accessed via userspace addresses. Guard the asm_volatile_goto() variation with CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_TIED_OUTPUT, the "+m" constraint fails on some compilers that otherwise support CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20220202004945.2540433-3-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-01-27x86/uaccess: Move variable into switch case statementKees Cook1-2/+3
[ Upstream commit 61646ca83d3889696f2772edaff122dd96a2935e ] When building with automatic stack variable initialization, GCC 12 complains about variables defined outside of switch case statements. Move the variable into the case that uses it, which silences the warning: ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:317:23: warning: statement will never be executed [-Wswitch-unreachable] 317 | unsigned char x_u8__; \ | ^~~~~~ Fixes: 865c50e1d279 ("x86/uaccess: utilize CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211209043456.1377875-1-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-13x86/uaccess: Fix 32-bit __get_user_asm_u64() when CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT=yWill Deacon1-2/+2
Commit 865c50e1d279 ("x86/uaccess: utilize CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT") added an optimised version of __get_user_asm() for x86 using 'asm goto'. Like the non-optimised code, the 32-bit implementation of 64-bit get_user() expands to a pair of 32-bit accesses. Unlike the non-optimised code, the _original_ pointer is incremented to copy the high word instead of loading through a new pointer explicitly constructed to point at a 32-bit type. Consequently, if the pointer points at a 64-bit type then we end up loading the wrong data for the upper 32-bits. This was observed as a mount() failure in Android targeting i686 after b0cfcdd9b967 ("d_path: make 'prepend()' fill up the buffer exactly on overflow") because the call to copy_from_kernel_nofault() from prepend_copy() ends up in __get_kernel_nofault() and casts the source pointer to a 'u64 __user *'. An attempt to mount at "/debug_ramdisk" therefore ends up failing trying to mount "/debumdismdisk". Use the existing '__gu_ptr' source pointer to unsigned int for 32-bit __get_user_asm_u64() instead of the original pointer. Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Fixes: 865c50e1d279 ("x86/uaccess: utilize CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUT") Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-23x86/uaccess: fix code generation in put_user()Rasmus Villemoes1-1/+9
Quoting https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Local-Register-Variables.html: You can define a local register variable and associate it with a specified register... The only supported use for this feature is to specify registers for input and output operands when calling Extended asm (see Extended Asm). This may be necessary if the constraints for a particular machine don't provide sufficient control to select the desired register. On 32-bit x86, this is used to ensure that gcc will put an 8-byte value into the %edx:%eax pair, while all other cases will just use the single register %eax (%rax on x86-64). While the _ASM_AX actually just expands to "%eax", note this comment next to get_user() which does something very similar: * The use of _ASM_DX as the register specifier is a bit of a * simplification, as gcc only cares about it as the starting point * and not size: for a 64-bit value it will use %ecx:%edx on 32 bits * (%ecx being the next register in gcc's x86 register sequence), and * %rdx on 64 bits. However, getting this to work requires that there is no code between the assignment to the local register variable and its use as an input to the asm() which can possibly clobber any of the registers involved - including evaluation of the expressions making up other inputs. In the current code, the ptr expression used directly as an input may cause such code to be emitted. For example, Sean Christopherson observed that with KASAN enabled and ptr being current->set_child_tid (from chedule_tail()), the load of current->set_child_tid causes a call to __asan_load8() to be emitted immediately prior to the __put_user_4 call, and Naresh Kamboju reports that various mmstress tests fail on KASAN-enabled builds. It's also possible to synthesize a broken case without KASAN if one uses "foo()" as the ptr argument, with foo being some "extern u64 __user *foo(void);" (though I don't know if that appears in real code). Fix it by making sure ptr gets evaluated before the assignment to __val_pu, and add a comment that __val_pu must be the last thing computed before the asm() is entered. Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Fixes: d55564cfc222 ("x86: Make __put_user() generate an out-of-line call") Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-22Merge branch 'work.set_fs' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-25/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs Pull initial set_fs() removal from Al Viro: "Christoph's set_fs base series + fixups" * 'work.set_fs' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: fs: Allow a NULL pos pointer to __kernel_read fs: Allow a NULL pos pointer to __kernel_write powerpc: remove address space overrides using set_fs() powerpc: use non-set_fs based maccess routines x86: remove address space overrides using set_fs() x86: make TASK_SIZE_MAX usable from assembly code x86: move PAGE_OFFSET, TASK_SIZE & friends to page_{32,64}_types.h lkdtm: remove set_fs-based tests test_bitmap: remove user bitmap tests uaccess: add infrastructure for kernel builds with set_fs() fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops fs: don't allow kernel reads and writes without iter ops sysctl: Convert to iter interfaces proc: add a read_iter method to proc proc_ops proc: cleanup the compat vs no compat file ops proc: remove a level of indentation in proc_get_inode
2020-10-13Merge tag 'x86_asm_for_v5.10' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 asm updates from Borislav Petkov: "Two asm wrapper fixes: - Use XORL instead of XORQ to avoid a REX prefix and save some bytes in the .fixup section, by Uros Bizjak. - Replace __force_order dummy variable with a memory clobber to fix LLVM requiring a definition for former and to prevent memory accesses from still being cached/reordered, by Arvind Sankar" * tag 'x86_asm_for_v5.10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/asm: Replace __force_order with a memory clobber x86/uaccess: Use XORL %0,%0 in __get_user_asm()
2020-10-13x86/uaccess: utilize CONFIG_CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO_OUTPUTNick Desaulniers1-0/+66
Clang-11 shipped support for outputs to asm goto statments along the fallthrough path. Double up some of the get_user() and related macros to be able to take advantage of this extended GNU C extension. This should help improve the generated code's performance for these accesses. Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-13x86: Make __put_user() generate an out-of-line callLinus Torvalds1-75/+44
Instead of inlining the stac/mov/clac sequence (which also requires individual exception table entries and several asm instruction alternatives entries), just generate "call __put_user_nocheck_X" for the __put_user() cases, the same way we changed __get_user earlier. Unlike the get_user() case, we didn't have the same nice infrastructure to just generate the call with a single case, so this actually has to change some of the infrastructure in order to do this. But that only cleans up the code further. So now, instead of using a case statement for the sizes, we just do the same thing we've done on the get_user() side for a long time: use the size as an immediate constant to the asm, and generate the asm that way directly. In order to handle the special case of 64-bit data on a 32-bit kernel, I needed to change the calling convention slightly: the data is passed in %eax[:%edx], the pointer in %ecx, and the return value is also returned in %ecx. It used to be returned in %eax, but because of how %eax can now be a double register input, we don't want mix that with a single-register output. The actual low-level asm is easier to handle: we'll just share the code between the checking and non-checking case, with the non-checking case jumping into the middle of the function. That may sound a bit too special, but this code is all very very special anyway, so... Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-13x86: Make __get_user() generate an out-of-line callLinus Torvalds1-74/+54
Instead of inlining the whole stac/lfence/mov/clac sequence (which also requires individual exception table entries and several asm instruction alternatives entries), just generate "call __get_user_nocheck_X" for the __get_user() cases. We can use all the same infrastructure that we already do for the regular "get_user()", and the end result is simpler source code, and much simpler code generation. It also means that when I introduce asm goto with input for "unsafe_get_user()", there are no nasty interactions with the __get_user() code. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-06x86, powerpc: Rename memcpy_mcsafe() to copy_mc_to_{user, kernel}()Dan Williams1-0/+9
In reaction to a proposal to introduce a memcpy_mcsafe_fast() implementation Linus points out that memcpy_mcsafe() is poorly named relative to communicating the scope of the interface. Specifically what addresses are valid to pass as source, destination, and what faults / exceptions are handled. Of particular concern is that even though x86 might be able to handle the semantics of copy_mc_to_user() with its common copy_user_generic() implementation other archs likely need / want an explicit path for this case: On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:28 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:21 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > > > However now I see that copy_user_generic() works for the wrong reason. > > It works because the exception on the source address due to poison > > looks no different than a write fault on the user address to the > > caller, it's still just a short copy. So it makes copy_to_user() work > > for the wrong reason relative to the name. > > Right. > > And it won't work that way on other architectures. On x86, we have a > generic function that can take faults on either side, and we use it > for both cases (and for the "in_user" case too), but that's an > artifact of the architecture oddity. > > In fact, it's probably wrong even on x86 - because it can hide bugs - > but writing those things is painful enough that everybody prefers > having just one function. Replace a single top-level memcpy_mcsafe() with either copy_mc_to_user(), or copy_mc_to_kernel(). Introduce an x86 copy_mc_fragile() name as the rename for the low-level x86 implementation formerly named memcpy_mcsafe(). It is used as the slow / careful backend that is supplanted by a fast copy_mc_generic() in a follow-on patch. One side-effect of this reorganization is that separating copy_mc_64.S to its own file means that perf no longer needs to track dependencies for its memcpy_64.S benchmarks. [ bp: Massage a bit. ] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wjSqtXAqfUJxFtWNwmguFASTgB0dz1dT3V-78Quiezqbg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160195561680.2163339.11574962055305783722.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2020-09-09x86: remove address space overrides using set_fs()Christoph Hellwig1-25/+1
Stop providing the possibility to override the address space using set_fs() now that there is no need for that any more. To properly handle the TASK_SIZE_MAX checking for 4 vs 5-level page tables on x86 a new alternative is introduced, which just like the one in entry_64.S has to use the hardcoded virtual address bits to escape the fact that TASK_SIZE_MAX isn't actually a constant when 5-level page tables are enabled. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-09-03x86/uaccess: Use XORL %0,%0 in __get_user_asm()Uros Bizjak1-1/+1
XORL %0,%0 is equivalent to XORQ %0,%0 as both will zero the entire register. Use XORL %0,%0 for all operand sizes to avoid REX prefix byte when legacy registers are used and to avoid size prefix byte when 16bit registers are used. Zeroing the full register is OK in this use case. As a result, the size of the .fixup section decreases by 20 bytes. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200827180904.96399-1-ubizjak@gmail.com
2020-08-12uaccess: remove segment_eqChristoph Hellwig1-1/+1
segment_eq is only used to implement uaccess_kernel. Just open code uaccess_kernel in the arch uaccess headers and remove one layer of indirection. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com> Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200710135706.537715-5-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-07-23x86/uaccess: Make __get_user_size() Clang compliant on 32-bitNick Desaulniers1-1/+4
Clang fails to compile __get_user_size() on 32-bit for the following code: long long val; __get_user(val, usrptr); with: error: invalid output size for constraint '=q' GCC compiles the same code without complaints. The reason is that GCC and Clang are architecturally different, which leads to subtle issues for code that's invalid but clearly dead, i.e. with code that emulates polymorphism with the preprocessor and sizeof. GCC will perform semantic analysis after early inlining and dead code elimination, so it will not warn on invalid code that's dead. Clang strictly performs optimizations after semantic analysis, so it will warn for dead code. Neither Clang nor GCC like this very much with -m32: long long ret; asm ("movb $5, %0" : "=q" (ret)); However, GCC can tolerate this variant: long long ret; switch (sizeof(ret)) { case 1: asm ("movb $5, %0" : "=q" (ret)); break; case 8:; } Clang, on the other hand, won't accept that because it validates the inline asm for the '1' case before the optimisation phase where it realises that it wouldn't have to emit it anyway. If LLVM (Clang's "back end") fails such as during instruction selection or register allocation, it cannot provide accurate diagnostics (warnings / errors) that contain line information, as the AST has been discarded from memory at that point. While there have been early discussions about having C/C++ specific language optimizations in Clang via the use of MLIR, which would enable such earlier optimizations, such work is not scoped and likely a multi-year endeavor. It was discussed to change the asm output constraint for the one byte case from "=q" to "=r". While it works for 64-bit, it fails on 32-bit. With '=r' the compiler could fail to chose a register accessible as high/low which is required for the byte operation. If that happens the assembly will fail. Use a local temporary variable of type 'unsigned char' as output for the byte copy inline asm and then assign it to the real output variable. This prevents Clang from failing the semantic analysis in the above case. The resulting code for the actual one byte copy is not affected as the temporary variable is optimized out. [ tglx: Amended changelog ] Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reported-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Reported-by: Dmitry Golovin <dima@golovin.in> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33587 Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/3 Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/194 Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/781 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180209161833.4605-1-dwmw2@infradead.org/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a1EBaWdbAEzirFDSgHVJMtWjuNt2HGG8z+vpXeNHwETFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200720204925.3654302-12-ndesaulniers@google.com
2020-06-09x86: use proper parentheses around new uaccess macro argument usesLinus Torvalds1-7/+7
__get_kernel_nofault() didn't have the parentheses around the use of 'src' and 'dst' macro arguments, making the casts potentially do the wrong thing. The parentheses aren't necessary with the current very limited use in mm/access.c, but it's bad form, and future use-cases might have very unexpected errors as a result. Do the same for unsafe_copy_loop() while at it, although in that case it is an entirely internal x86 uaccess helper macro that isn't used anywhere else and any other use would be invalid anyway. Fixes: fa94111d9435 ("x86: use non-set_fs based maccess routines") Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09x86: use non-set_fs based maccess routinesChristoph Hellwig1-0/+16
Provide arch_kernel_read and arch_kernel_write routines to implement the maccess routines without messing with set_fs and without stac/clac that opens up access to user space. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200521152301.2587579-20-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: start using named parameters for low-level uaccess asmsLinus Torvalds1-11/+15
This is partly for readability - using named arguments instead of numbered ones makes it muchmore obvious just what is going on. Using "%[efault]" instead of "%4" for the special -EFAULT constant just means that you don't have to count the arguments to see what's up. But the motivation for all this cleanup is that when we'll start to conditionally use "asm goto" even for the __get_user_asm() case, the argument numbers will depend on whether we have an error output, or an error label we can just directly jump to. So this moves us towards named arguments for the same reason that we have to use named arguments for the asms that use SET_CC(): numbering will eventually become similarly unreliable and depends on whether we can use particular compiler features or not. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: get rid of 'rtype' argument to __get_user_asm() macroLinus Torvalds1-11/+17
This is the exact same thing as 3680785692fb ("x86: get rid of 'rtype' argument to __put_user_goto() macro") except it's about __get_user_asm() rather than __put_user_goto(). The reasons are the same: having the low-level asm access the argument with a different size than the compiler thinks it does is fundamentally wrong. But unlike the __put_user_goto() case, we actually did tell the compiler that we used a bigger variable (either long or long long), and then only filled in the low bits, and ended up "fixing" this by casting the result to the proper pointer type. That's because we needed to use a non-qualified type (the user pointer might be a const pointer!), and that makes this a bit more painful. Our '__inttype()' macro used to be lazy and only differentiate between "fits in a register" or "needs two registers". So this fix had to also make that '__inttype()' macro more precise. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: get rid of 'rtype' argument to __put_user_goto() macroLinus Torvalds1-7/+7
The 'rtype' argument goes back to pre-git (and pre-BK) times, and comes from the fact that we used to not necessarily have the same type sizes for the arguments of the inline asm as we did for the actual accesses we did. So 'rtype' is the 'register type' - the override of the register size in the inline asm when it doesn't match the actual size of the variable we use as the output argument (for when you used "put_user()" on an "int" value that was assigned to a byte-sized user space access etc). That mismatch doesn't actually exist any more, and should probably never have existed in the first place. It's a horrid bug just waiting to happen (using more - or less - of the variable that the compiler expected us to use). I think we had some odd casting going on to hide the effects of that oddity after-the-fact, but those are long gone, and these days we should always have the right size value in the first place, using things like __typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x); and gcc should thus have the right register size without any manual 'rtype' games. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: get rid of 'errret' argument to __get_user_xyz() macrossLinus Torvalds1-15/+15
Every remaining user just has the error case returning -EFAULT. In fact, the exception was __get_user_asm_nozero(), which was removed in commit 4b842e4e25b1 ("x86: get rid of small constant size cases in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()"), and the other __get_user_xyz() macros just followed suit for consistency. Fix up some macro whitespace while at it. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-01x86: remove __put_user_asm() infrastructureLinus Torvalds1-11/+0
The last user was removed by commit 4b842e4e25b1 ("x86: get rid of small constant size cases in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()"). Get rid of the left-overs before somebody tries to use it again. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-03-31Merge branch 'x86-cleanups-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-140/+0
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 cleanups from Ingo Molnar: "This topic tree contains more commits than usual: - most of it are uaccess cleanups/reorganization by Al - there's a bunch of prototype declaration (--Wmissing-prototypes) cleanups - misc other cleanups all around the map" * 'x86-cleanups-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (36 commits) x86/mm/set_memory: Fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings x86/efi: Add a prototype for efi_arch_mem_reserve() x86/mm: Mark setup_emu2phys_nid() static x86/jump_label: Move 'inline' keyword placement x86/platform/uv: Add a missing prototype for uv_bau_message_interrupt() kill uaccess_try() x86: unsafe_put-style macro for sigmask x86: x32_setup_rt_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: __setup_rt_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: __setup_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: setup_sigcontext(): list user_access_{begin,end}() into callers x86: get rid of put_user_try in __setup_rt_frame() (both 32bit and 64bit) x86: ia32_setup_rt_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: ia32_setup_frame(): consolidate uaccess areas x86: ia32_setup_sigcontext(): lift user_access_{begin,end}() into the callers x86/alternatives: Mark text_poke_loc_init() static x86/cpu: Fix a -Wmissing-prototypes warning for init_ia32_feat_ctl() x86/mm: Drop pud_mknotpresent() x86: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() x86/configs: Slightly reduce defconfigs ...
2020-03-28x86: get rid of user_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic()Al Viro1-93/+0
Only one user left; the thing had been made polymorphic back in 2013 for the sake of MPX. No point keeping it now that MPX is gone. Convert futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() to user_access_{begin,end}() while we are at it. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-03-26kill uaccess_try()Al Viro1-65/+0
finally Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-03-19x86: kill get_user_{try,catch,ex}Al Viro1-54/+0
no users left Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-03-18x86: get rid of small constant size cases in raw_copy_{to,from}_user()Al Viro1-12/+0
Very few call sites where that would be triggered remain, and none of those is anywhere near hot enough to bother. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2020-02-16x86 user stack frame reads: switch to explicit __get_user()Al Viro1-9/+0
rather than relying upon the magic in raw_copy_from_user() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2019-10-07uaccess: implement a proper unsafe_copy_to_user() and switch filldir over to itLinus Torvalds1-0/+23
In commit 9f79b78ef744 ("Convert filldir[64]() from __put_user() to unsafe_put_user()") I made filldir() use unsafe_put_user(), which improves code generation on x86 enormously. But because we didn't have a "unsafe_copy_to_user()", the dirent name copy was also done by hand with unsafe_put_user() in a loop, and it turns out that a lot of other architectures didn't like that, because unlike x86, they have various alignment issues. Most non-x86 architectures trap and fix it up, and some (like xtensa) will just fail unaligned put_user() accesses unconditionally. Which makes that "copy using put_user() in a loop" not work for them at all. I could make that code do explicit alignment etc, but the architectures that don't like unaligned accesses also don't really use the fancy "user_access_begin/end()" model, so they might just use the regular old __copy_to_user() interface. So this commit takes that looping implementation, turns it into the x86 version of "unsafe_copy_to_user()", and makes other architectures implement the unsafe copy version as __copy_to_user() (the same way they do for the other unsafe_xyz() accessor functions). Note that it only does this for the copying _to_ user space, and we still don't have a unsafe version of copy_from_user(). That's partly because we have no current users of it, but also partly because the copy_from_user() case is slightly different and cannot efficiently be implemented in terms of a unsafe_get_user() loop (because gcc can't do asm goto with outputs). It would be trivial to do this using "rep movsb", which would work really nicely on newer x86 cores, but really badly on some older ones. Al Viro is looking at cleaning up all our user copy routines to make this all a non-issue, but for now we have this simple-but-stupid version for x86 that works fine for the dirent name copy case because those names are short strings and we simply don't need anything fancier. Fixes: 9f79b78ef744 ("Convert filldir[64]() from __put_user() to unsafe_put_user()") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-09-02x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flags into __get_user() argument evaluationPeter Zijlstra1-1/+3
Identical to __put_user(); the __get_user() argument evalution will too leak UBSAN crud into the __uaccess_begin() / __uaccess_end() region. While uncommon this was observed to happen for: drivers/xen/gntdev.c: if (__get_user(old_status, batch->status[i])) where UBSAN added array bound checking. This complements commit: 6ae865615fc4 ("x86/uaccess: Dont leak the AC flag into __put_user() argument evaluation") Tested-by Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: broonie@kernel.org Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: mhocko@suse.cz Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190829082445.GM2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2019-05-26x86/uaccess: Allow access_ok() in irq context if pagefault_disabledMasami Hiramatsu1-1/+3
WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() assumes that the access_ok() and following user memory access can sleep. But this assumption is not always correct; when the pagefault is disabled, following memory access will just returns -EFAULT and never sleep. Add pagefault_disabled() check in WARN_ON_ONCE() so that it can ignore the case we call it with disabling pagefault. For this purpose, this modified pagefault_disabled() as an inline function. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/155789868664.26965.7932665824135793317.stgit@devnote2 Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2019-05-07Merge branch 'x86-asm-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 asm updates from Ingo Molnar: "This includes the following changes: - cpu_has() cleanups - sync_bitops.h modernization to the rmwcc.h facility, similarly to bitops.h - continued LTO annotations/fixes - misc cleanups and smaller cleanups" * 'x86-asm-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/um/vdso: Drop unnecessary cc-ldoption x86/vdso: Rename variable to fix -Wshadow warning x86/cpu/amd: Exclude 32bit only assembler from 64bit build x86/asm: Mark all top level asm statements as .text x86/build/vdso: Add FORCE to the build rule of %.so x86/asm: Modernize sync_bitops.h x86/mm: Convert some slow-path static_cpu_has() callers to boot_cpu_has() x86: Convert some slow-path static_cpu_has() callers to boot_cpu_has() x86/asm: Clarify static_cpu_has()'s intended use x86/uaccess: Fix implicit cast of __user pointer x86/cpufeature: Remove __pure attribute to _static_cpu_has()
2019-04-24x86/uaccess: Dont leak the AC flag into __put_user() argument evaluationPeter Zijlstra1-3/+4
The __put_user() macro evaluates it's @ptr argument inside the __uaccess_begin() / __uaccess_end() region. While this would normally not be expected to be an issue, an UBSAN bug (it ignored -fwrapv, fixed in GCC 8+) would transform the @ptr evaluation for: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: if (unlikely(__put_user(offset, &urelocs[r-stack].presumed_offset))) { into a signed-overflow-UB check and trigger the objtool AC validation. Finish this commit: 2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation") and explicitly evaluate all 3 arguments early. Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: luto@kernel.org Fixes: 2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190424072208.695962771@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-03x86/uaccess: Fix implicit cast of __user pointerJann Horn1-2/+1
The first two arguments of __user_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() are: - @uval is a kernel pointer into which the old value should be stored - @ptr is the user pointer on which the cmpxchg should operate This means that casting @uval to __typeof__(ptr) is wrong. Since @uval is only used once inside the macro, just get rid of __uval and use (uval) directly. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190329214652.258477-4-jannh@google.com
2019-04-03x86/uaccess: Introduce user_access_{save,restore}()Peter Zijlstra1-0/+3
Introduce common helpers for when we need to safely suspend a uaccess section; for instance to generate a {KA,UB}SAN report. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-04-03x86/uaccess: Always inline user_access_begin()Peter Zijlstra1-1/+1
If GCC out-of-lines it, the STAC and CLAC are in different fuctions and objtool gets upset. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-03-08Merge branch 'x86-cleanups-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-3/+0
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 cleanups from Ingo Molnar: "Various cleanups and simplifications, none of them really stands out, they are all over the place" * 'x86-cleanups-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/uaccess: Remove unused __addr_ok() macro x86/smpboot: Remove unused phys_id variable x86/mm/dump_pagetables: Remove the unused prev_pud variable x86/fpu: Move init_xstate_size() to __init section x86/cpu_entry_area: Move percpu_setup_debug_store() to __init section x86/mtrr: Remove unused variable x86/boot/compressed/64: Explain paging_prepare()'s return value x86/resctrl: Remove duplicate MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL definition x86/asm/suspend: Drop ENTRY from local data x86/hw_breakpoints, kprobes: Remove kprobes ifdeffery x86/boot: Save several bytes in decompressor x86/trap: Remove useless declaration x86/mm/tlb: Remove unused cpu variable x86/events: Mark expected switch-case fall-throughs x86/asm-prototypes: Remove duplicate include <asm/page.h> x86/kernel: Mark expected switch-case fall-throughs x86/insn-eval: Mark expected switch-case fall-through x86/platform/UV: Replace kmalloc() and memset() with k[cz]alloc() calls x86/e820: Replace kmalloc() + memcpy() with kmemdup()
2019-03-06docs/core-api/mm: fix user memory accessors formattingMike Rapoport1-12/+12
The descriptions of userspace memory access functions had minor issues with formatting that made kernel-doc unable to properly detect the function/macro names and the return value sections: ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:80: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:139: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:231: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:505: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:530: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c:58: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c:69: warning: No description found for return value of 'clear_user' ./arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c:78: info: Scanning doc for ./arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c:90: warning: No description found for return value of '__clear_user' Fix the formatting. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1549549644-4903-3-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-04get rid of legacy 'get_ds()' functionLinus Torvalds1-1/+0
Every in-kernel use of this function defined it to KERNEL_DS (either as an actual define, or as an inline function). It's an entirely historical artifact, and long long long ago used to actually read the segment selector valueof '%ds' on x86. Which in the kernel is always KERNEL_DS. Inspired by a patch from Jann Horn that just did this for a very small subset of users (the ones in fs/), along with Al who suggested a script. I then just took it to the logical extreme and removed all the remaining gunk. Roughly scripted with git grep -l '(get_ds())' -- :^tools/ | xargs sed -i 's/(get_ds())/(KERNEL_DS)/' git grep -lw 'get_ds' -- :^tools/ | xargs sed -i '/^#define get_ds()/d' plus manual fixups to remove a few unusual usage patterns, the couple of inline function cases and to fix up a comment that had become stale. The 'get_ds()' function remains in an x86 kvm selftest, since in user space it actually does something relevant. Inspired-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Inspired-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-02Merge branch 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+4
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "Two last minute fixes: - Prevent value evaluation via functions happening in the user access enabled region of __put_user() (put another way: make sure to evaluate the value to be stored in user space _before_ enabling user space accesses) - Correct the definition of a Hyper-V hypercall constant" * 'x86-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/hyper-v: Fix definition of HV_MAX_FLUSH_REP_COUNT x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation
2019-02-26x86/uaccess: Remove unused __addr_ok() macroBorislav Petkov1-3/+0
This was caught while staring at the whole {set,get}_fs() machinery. It's last user, the 32-bit version of strnlen_user() went away with 5723aa993d83 ("x86: use the new generic strnlen_user() function") so drop it. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org> Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190225191109.7671-1-bp@alien8.de
2019-02-25x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluationAndy Lutomirski1-2/+4
When calling __put_user(foo(), ptr), the __put_user() macro would call foo() in between __uaccess_begin() and __uaccess_end(). If that code were buggy, then those bugs would be run without SMAP protection. Fortunately, there seem to be few instances of the problem in the kernel. Nevertheless, __put_user() should be fixed to avoid doing this. Therefore, evaluate __put_user()'s argument before setting AC. This issue was noticed when an objtool hack by Peter Zijlstra complained about genregs_get() and I compared the assembly output to the C source. [ bp: Massage commit message and fixed up whitespace. ] Fixes: 11f1a4b9755f ("x86: reorganize SMAP handling in user space accesses") Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190225125231.845656645@infradead.org
2019-01-20x86: uaccess: Inhibit speculation past access_ok() in user_access_begin()Will Deacon1-1/+1
Commit 594cc251fdd0 ("make 'user_access_begin()' do 'access_ok()'") makes the access_ok() check part of the user_access_begin() preceding a series of 'unsafe' accesses. This has the desirable effect of ensuring that all 'unsafe' accesses have been range-checked, without having to pick through all of the callsites to verify whether the appropriate checking has been made. However, the consolidated range check does not inhibit speculation, so it is still up to the caller to ensure that they are not susceptible to any speculative side-channel attacks for user addresses that ultimately fail the access_ok() check. This is an oversight, so use __uaccess_begin_nospec() to ensure that speculation is inhibited until the access_ok() check has passed. Reported-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-05Use __put_user_goto in __put_user_size() and unsafe_put_user()Linus Torvalds1-31/+22
This actually enables the __put_user_goto() functionality in unsafe_put_user(). For an example of the effect of this, this is the code generated for the unsafe_put_user(signo, &infop->si_signo, Efault); in the waitid() system call: movl %ecx,(%rbx) # signo, MEM[(struct __large_struct *)_2] It's just one single store instruction, along with generating an exception table entry pointing to the Efault label case in case that instruction faults. Before, we would generate this: xorl %edx, %edx movl %ecx,(%rbx) # signo, MEM[(struct __large_struct *)_3] testl %edx, %edx jne .L309 with the exception table generated for that 'mov' instruction causing us to jump to a stub that set %edx to -EFAULT and then jumped back to the 'testl' instruction. So not only do we now get rid of the extra code in the normal sequence, we also avoid unnecessarily keeping that extra error register live across it all. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-05x86 uaccess: Introduce __put_user_gotoLinus Torvalds1-11/+17
This is finally the actual reason for the odd error handling in the "unsafe_get/put_user()" functions, introduced over three years ago. Using a "jump to error label" interface is somewhat odd, but very convenient as a programming interface, and more importantly, it fits very well with simply making the target be the exception handler address directly from the inline asm. The reason it took over three years to actually do this? We need "asm goto" support for it, which only became the default on x86 last year. It's now been a year that we've forced asm goto support (see commit e501ce957a78 "x86: Force asm-goto"), and so let's just do it here too. [ Side note: this commit was originally done back in 2016. The above commentary about timing is obviously about it only now getting merged into my real upstream tree - Linus ] Sadly, gcc still only supports "asm goto" with asms that do not have any outputs, so we are limited to only the put_user case for this. Maybe in several more years we can do the get_user case too. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04make 'user_access_begin()' do 'access_ok()'Linus Torvalds1-1/+8
Originally, the rule used to be that you'd have to do access_ok() separately, and then user_access_begin() before actually doing the direct (optimized) user access. But experience has shown that people then decide not to do access_ok() at all, and instead rely on it being implied by other operations or similar. Which makes it very hard to verify that the access has actually been range-checked. If you use the unsafe direct user accesses, hardware features (either SMAP - Supervisor Mode Access Protection - on x86, or PAN - Privileged Access Never - on ARM) do force you to use user_access_begin(). But nothing really forces the range check. By putting the range check into user_access_begin(), we actually force people to do the right thing (tm), and the range check vill be visible near the actual accesses. We have way too long a history of people trying to avoid them. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() functionLinus Torvalds1-5/+2
Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand. It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact. A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's just get this done once and for all. This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form. There were a couple of notable cases: - csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias. - the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing really used it) - microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch. I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-09-03x86/extable: Introduce _ASM_EXTABLE_UA for uaccess fixupsJann Horn1-11/+11
Currently, most fixups for attempting to access userspace memory are handled using _ASM_EXTABLE, which is also used for various other types of fixups (e.g. safe MSR access, IRET failures, and a bunch of other things). In order to make it possible to add special safety checks to uaccess fixups (in particular, checking whether the fault address is actually in userspace), introduce a new exception table handler ex_handler_uaccess() and wire it up to all the user access fixups (excluding ones that already use _ASM_EXTABLE_EX). Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: dvyukov@google.com Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180828201421.157735-5-jannh@google.com
2018-01-30x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospecDan Williams1-3/+3
Quoting Linus: I do think that it would be a good idea to very expressly document the fact that it's not that the user access itself is unsafe. I do agree that things like "get_user()" want to be protected, but not because of any direct bugs or problems with get_user() and friends, but simply because get_user() is an excellent source of a pointer that is obviously controlled from a potentially attacking user space. So it's a prime candidate for then finding _subsequent_ accesses that can then be used to perturb the cache. __uaccess_begin_nospec() covers __get_user() and copy_from_iter() where the limit check is far away from the user pointer de-reference. In those cases a barrier_nospec() prevents speculation with a potential pointer to privileged memory. uaccess_try_nospec covers get_user_try. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: alan@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
2018-01-30x86: Introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospecDan Williams1-0/+9
For __get_user() paths, do not allow the kernel to speculate on the value of a user controlled pointer. In addition to the 'stac' instruction for Supervisor Mode Access Protection (SMAP), a barrier_nospec() causes the access_ok() result to resolve in the pipeline before the CPU might take any speculative action on the pointer value. Given the cost of 'stac' the speculation barrier is placed after 'stac' to hopefully overlap the cost of disabling SMAP with the cost of flushing the instruction pipeline. Since __get_user is a major kernel interface that deals with user controlled pointers, the __uaccess_begin_nospec() mechanism will prevent speculative execution past an access_ok() permission check. While speculative execution past access_ok() is not enough to lead to a kernel memory leak, it is a necessary precondition. To be clear, __uaccess_begin_nospec() is addressing a class of potential problems near __get_user() usages. Note, that while the barrier_nospec() in __uaccess_begin_nospec() is used to protect __get_user(), pointer masking similar to array_index_nospec() will be used for get_user() since it incorporates a bounds check near the usage. uaccess_try_nospec provides the same mechanism for get_user_try. No functional changes. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: alan@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727415922.33451.5796614273104346583.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com