summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-05-29x86: Increase precision of x86_platform.get/set_wallclock()David Vrabel1-2/+2
All the virtualized platforms (KVM, lguest and Xen) have persistent wallclocks that have more than one second of precision. read_persistent_wallclock() and update_persistent_wallclock() allow for nanosecond precision but their implementation on x86 with x86_platform.get/set_wallclock() only allows for one second precision. This means guests may see a wallclock time that is off by up to 1 second. Make set_wallclock() and get_wallclock() take a struct timespec parameter (which allows for nanosecond precision) so KVM and Xen guests may start with a more accurate wallclock time and a Xen dom0 can maintain a more accurate wallclock for guests. Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
2012-03-28Disintegrate asm/system.h for X86David Howells1-1/+0
Disintegrate asm/system.h for X86. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> cc: x86@kernel.org
2011-12-18x86: Use "do { } while(0)" for empty lock_cmos()/unlock_cmos() macrosJesper Juhl1-2/+2
gcc noticed (when using -Wempty-body) that our use of lock_cmos() and unlock_cmos() in arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h is potentially problematic : arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h:32:15: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ¡else¢ statement [-Wempty-body] arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h:40:16: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ¡else¢ statement [-Wempty-body] Let's just use the standard 'do {} while (0)' solution. That shuts up gcc and also prevents future problems if the macros should end up being used in a similar situation elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LNX.2.00.1112180103130.21784@swampdragon.chaosbits.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-23x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guardsH. Peter Anvin1-3/+3
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-23x86, um: ... and asm-x86 moveAl Viro1-0/+104
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>