summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/emergency-restart.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-07-09reboot: move arch/x86 reboot= handling to generic kernelRobin Holt1-12/+0
Merge together the unicore32, arm, and x86 reboot= command line parameter handling. Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com> Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-06-17x86-64, reboot: Allow reboot=bios and reboot-cpu override on x86-64H. Peter Anvin1-2/+0
With the revamped realmode trampoline code, it is trivial to extend support for reboot=bios to x86-64. Furthermore, while we are at it, remove the restriction that only we can only override the reboot CPU on 32 bits. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-jopx7y6g6dbcx4tpal8q0jlr@git.kernel.org
2008-11-12x86: attempt reboot via port CF9 if we have standard PCI portsH. Peter Anvin1-1/+3
Impact: Changes reboot behavior. If port CF9 seems to be safe to touch, attempt it before trying the keyboard controller. Port CF9 is not available on all chipsets (a significant but decreasing number of modern chipsets don't implement it), but port CF9 itself should in general be safe to poke (no ill effects if unimplemented) on any system which has PCI Configuration Method #1 or #2, as it falls inside the PCI configuration port range in both cases. No chipset without PCI is known to have port CF9, either, although an explicit "pci=bios" would mean we miss this and therefore don't use port CF9. An explicit "reboot=pci" can be used to force the use of port CF9. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-23x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guardsH. Peter Anvin1-3/+3
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-23x86, um: ... and asm-x86 moveAl Viro1-0/+18
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>