summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/crypto/chacha20_glue.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-12-19x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used cpu_has_xx macrosBorislav Petkov1-1/+1
Those are stupid and code should use static_cpu_has_safe() or boot_cpu_has() instead. Kill the least used and unused ones. The remaining ones need more careful inspection before a conversion can happen. On the TODO. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449481182-27541-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-09-14x86/fpu: Rename XSAVE macrosDave Hansen1-1/+1
There are two concepts that have some confusing naming: 1. Extended State Component numbers (currently called XFEATURE_BIT_*) 2. Extended State Component masks (currently called XSTATE_*) The numbers are (currently) from 0-9. State component 3 is the bounds registers for MPX, for instance. But when we want to enable "state component 3", we go set a bit in XCR0. The bit we set is 1<<3. We can check to see if a state component feature is enabled by looking at its bit. The current 'xfeature_bit's are at best xfeature bit _numbers_. Calling them bits is at best inconsistent with ending the enum list with 'XFEATURES_NR_MAX'. This patch renames the enum to be 'xfeature'. These also happen to be what the Intel documentation calls a "state component". We also want to differentiate these from the "XSTATE_*" macros. The "XSTATE_*" macros are a mask, and we rename them to match. These macros are reasonably widely used so this patch is a wee bit big, but this really is just a rename. The only non-mechanical part of this is the s/XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK/XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND/ We need a better name for it, but that's another patch. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: dave@sr71.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150902233126.38653250@viggo.jf.intel.com [ Ported to v4.3-rc1. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-07-17crypto: chacha20 - Add an eight block AVX2 variant for x86_64Martin Willi1-0/+19
Extends the x86_64 ChaCha20 implementation by a function processing eight ChaCha20 blocks in parallel using AVX2. For large messages, throughput increases by ~55-70% compared to four block SSSE3: testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 42249230 operations in 10 seconds (675987680 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46441641 operations in 10 seconds (2972265024 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 33028112 operations in 10 seconds (8455196672 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 11568759 operations in 10 seconds (11846409216 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1448761 operations in 10 seconds (11868250112 bytes) testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 41999675 operations in 10 seconds (671994800 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 45805908 operations in 10 seconds (2931578112 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 32814947 operations in 10 seconds (8400626432 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 19777167 operations in 10 seconds (20251819008 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 2279321 operations in 10 seconds (18672197632 bytes) Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2015-07-17crypto: chacha20 - Add a four block SSSE3 variant for x86_64Martin Willi1-0/+8
Extends the x86_64 SSSE3 ChaCha20 implementation by a function processing four ChaCha20 blocks in parallel. This avoids the word shuffling needed in the single block variant, further increasing throughput. For large messages, throughput increases by ~110% compared to single block SSSE3: testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 43141886 operations in 10 seconds (690270176 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46845874 operations in 10 seconds (2998135936 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 18458512 operations in 10 seconds (4725379072 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 5360533 operations in 10 seconds (5489185792 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 692846 operations in 10 seconds (5675794432 bytes) testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 42249230 operations in 10 seconds (675987680 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46441641 operations in 10 seconds (2972265024 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 33028112 operations in 10 seconds (8455196672 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 11568759 operations in 10 seconds (11846409216 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1448761 operations in 10 seconds (11868250112 bytes) Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2015-07-17crypto: chacha20 - Add a SSSE3 SIMD variant for x86_64Martin Willi1-0/+123
Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the ChaCha20 stream cipher. This single block variant works on a single state matrix using SSE instructions. It requires SSSE3 due the use of pshufb for efficient 8/16-bit rotate operations. For large messages, throughput increases by ~65% compared to chacha20-generic: testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-generic) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 45089207 operations in 10 seconds (721427312 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 43839521 operations in 10 seconds (2805729344 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 12702056 operations in 10 seconds (3251726336 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 3371173 operations in 10 seconds (3452081152 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 422468 operations in 10 seconds (3460857856 bytes) testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 43141886 operations in 10 seconds (690270176 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46845874 operations in 10 seconds (2998135936 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 18458512 operations in 10 seconds (4725379072 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 5360533 operations in 10 seconds (5489185792 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 692846 operations in 10 seconds (5675794432 bytes) Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>