| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
[ Upstream commit 80bf6ceaf9310b3f61934c69b382d4912deee049 ]
When we get into activate_mm(), lockdep complains that we're doing
something strange:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.1.0-10252-gb00152307319-dirty #121 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
inside.sh/366 is trying to acquire lock:
(____ptrval____) (&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: flush_old_exec+0x703/0x8d7
but task is already holding lock:
(____ptrval____) (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: flush_old_exec+0x6c5/0x8d7
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
[...]
__lock_acquire+0x12ab/0x139f
lock_acquire+0x155/0x18e
down_write+0x3f/0x98
flush_old_exec+0x748/0x8d7
load_elf_binary+0x2ca/0xddb
[...]
-> #0 (&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock){+.+.}:
[...]
__lock_acquire+0x12ab/0x139f
lock_acquire+0x155/0x18e
_raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x83
flush_old_exec+0x703/0x8d7
load_elf_binary+0x2ca/0xddb
[...]
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
lock(&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock);
lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
lock(&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by inside.sh/366:
#0: (____ptrval____) (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}, at: __do_execve_file+0x12d/0x869
#1: (____ptrval____) (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: flush_old_exec+0x6c5/0x8d7
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 366 Comm: inside.sh Not tainted 5.1.0-10252-gb00152307319-dirty #121
Stack:
[...]
Call Trace:
[<600420de>] show_stack+0x13b/0x155
[<6048906b>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c
[<6009ae64>] print_circular_bug+0x332/0x343
[<6009c5c6>] check_prev_add+0x669/0xdad
[<600a06b4>] __lock_acquire+0x12ab/0x139f
[<6009f3d0>] lock_acquire+0x155/0x18e
[<604a07e0>] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x83
[<60151e6a>] flush_old_exec+0x703/0x8d7
[<601a8eb8>] load_elf_binary+0x2ca/0xddb
[...]
I think it's because in exec_mmap() we have
down_read(&old_mm->mmap_sem);
...
task_lock(tsk);
...
activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
(which does down_write(&mm->mmap_sem))
I'm not really sure why lockdep throws in the whole knowledge
about the task lock, but it seems that old_mm and mm shouldn't
ever be the same (and it doesn't deadlock) so tell lockdep that
they're different.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
UML has a special mmu_context.h and needs updates whenever the generic one
is updated.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160218183557.AE1DB383@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
The x86 MPX patch set calls arch_unmap() and arch_bprm_mm_init()
from fs/exec.c, so we need at least a stub for them in all
architectures. They are only called under an #ifdef for
CONFIG_MMU=y, so we can at least restict this to architectures
with MMU support.
blackfin/c6x have no MMU support, so do not call arch_unmap().
They also do not include mm_hooks.h or mmu_context.h at all and
do not need to be touched.
s390, um and unicore32 do not use asm-generic/mm_hooks.h, so got
their own arch_unmap() versions. (I also moved um's
arch_dup_mmap() to be closer to the other mm_hooks.h functions).
xtensa only includes mm_hooks when MMU=y, which should be fine
since arch_unmap() is called only from MMU=y code.
For the rest, we use the stub copies of these functions in
asm-generic/mm_hook.h.
I cross compiled defconfigs for cris (to check NOMMU) and s390
to make sure that this works. I also checked a 64-bit build
of UML and all my normal x86 builds including PARAVIRT on and
off.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141118182350.8B4AA2C2@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
doesn't hold it
... while calling uml_dup_mmap()
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
|
Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask.
It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
(the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
|
