Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Looks like future sh variants will support a 4-byte cas which will be
used to implement 1 and 2 byte xchg.
This is exactly what we do for llsc now, move the portable part of the
code into a separate header so it's easy to reuse.
Suggested-by: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
|
|
This completes the xchg implementation for sh architecture. Note: The
llsc variant is tricky since this only supports 4 byte atomics, the
existing implementation of 1 byte xchg is wrong: we need to do a 4 byte
cmpxchg and retry if any bytes changed meanwhile.
Write this in C for clarity.
Suggested-by: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
|
|
This fixes up a typo in the ll/sc based cmpxchg code which apparently
wasn't getting a lot of testing due to the swapped old/new pair. With
that fixed up, the ll/sc code also starts using it and provides its own
atomic_add_unless().
Signed-off-by: Aoi Shinkai <shinkoi2005@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
|
|
When dereferencing the memory address contained in a register and
modifying the value at that memory address, the register should not be
listed in the inline asm outputs. The value at the memory address is an
output (which is taken care of with the "memory" clobber), not the register.
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
|