| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When a CPU is brought up, it is checked against the caps that are
known to be enabled on the system (via verify_local_cpu_capabilities()).
Based on the state of the capability on the CPU vs. that of System we
could have the following combinations of conflict.
x-----------------------------x
| Type | System | Late CPU |
|-----------------------------|
| a | y | n |
|-----------------------------|
| b | n | y |
x-----------------------------x
Case (a) is not permitted for caps which are system features, which the
system expects all the CPUs to have (e.g VHE). While (a) is ignored for
all errata work arounds. However, there could be exceptions to the plain
filtering approach. e.g, KPTI is an optional feature for a late CPU as
long as the system already enables it.
Case (b) is not permitted for errata work arounds that cannot be activated
after the kernel has finished booting.And we ignore (b) for features. Here,
yet again, KPTI is an exception, where if a late CPU needs KPTI we are too
late to enable it (because we change the allocation of ASIDs etc).
Add two different flags to indicate how the conflict should be handled.
ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU - CPUs may have the capability
ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU - CPUs may not have the cappability.
Now that we have the flags to describe the behavior of the errata and
the features, as we treat them, define types for ERRATUM and FEATURE.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
We use arm64_cpu_capabilities to represent CPU ELF HWCAPs exposed
to the userspace and the CPU hwcaps used by the kernel, which
include cpu features and CPU errata work arounds. Capabilities
have some properties that decide how they should be treated :
1) Detection, i.e scope : A cap could be "detected" either :
- if it is present on at least one CPU (SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU)
Or
- if it is present on all the CPUs (SCOPE_SYSTEM)
2) When is it enabled ? - A cap is treated as "enabled" when the
system takes some action based on whether the capability is detected or
not. e.g, setting some control register, patching the kernel code.
Right now, we treat all caps are enabled at boot-time, after all
the CPUs are brought up by the kernel. But there are certain caps,
which are enabled early during the boot (e.g, VHE, GIC_CPUIF for NMI)
and kernel starts using them, even before the secondary CPUs are brought
up. We would need a way to describe this for each capability.
3) Conflict on a late CPU - When a CPU is brought up, it is checked
against the caps that are known to be enabled on the system (via
verify_local_cpu_capabilities()). Based on the state of the capability
on the CPU vs. that of System we could have the following combinations
of conflict.
x-----------------------------x
| Type | System | Late CPU |
------------------------------|
| a | y | n |
------------------------------|
| b | n | y |
x-----------------------------x
Case (a) is not permitted for caps which are system features, which the
system expects all the CPUs to have (e.g VHE). While (a) is ignored for
all errata work arounds. However, there could be exceptions to the plain
filtering approach. e.g, KPTI is an optional feature for a late CPU as
long as the system already enables it.
Case (b) is not permitted for errata work arounds which requires some
work around, which cannot be delayed. And we ignore (b) for features.
Here, yet again, KPTI is an exception, where if a late CPU needs KPTI we
are too late to enable it (because we change the allocation of ASIDs
etc).
So this calls for a lot more fine grained behavior for each capability.
And if we define all the attributes to control their behavior properly,
we may be able to use a single table for the CPU hwcaps (which cover
errata and features, not the ELF HWCAPs). This is a prepartory step
to get there. More bits would be added for the properties listed above.
We are going to use a bit-mask to encode all the properties of a
capabilities. This patch encodes the "SCOPE" of the capability.
As such there is no change in how the capabilities are treated.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
We have errata work around processing code in cpu_errata.c,
which calls back into helpers defined in cpufeature.c. Now
that we are going to make the handling of capabilities
generic, by adding the information to each capability,
move the errata work around specific processing code.
No functional changes.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
We issue the enable() call back for all CPU hwcaps capabilities
available on the system, on all the CPUs. So far we have ignored
the argument passed to the call back, which had a prototype to
accept a "void *" for use with on_each_cpu() and later with
stop_machine(). However, with commit 0a0d111d40fd1
("arm64: cpufeature: Pass capability structure to ->enable callback"),
there are some users of the argument who wants the matching capability
struct pointer where there are multiple matching criteria for a single
capability. Clean up the declaration of the call back to make it clear.
1) Renamed to cpu_enable(), to imply taking necessary actions on the
called CPU for the entry.
2) Pass const pointer to the capability, to allow the call back to
check the entry. (e.,g to check if any action is needed on the CPU)
3) We don't care about the result of the call back, turning this to
a void.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
[suzuki: convert more users, rename call back and drop results]
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
We would like to reset the Group-0 Active Priority Registers
at boot time if they are available to us. They would be available
if SCR_EL3.FIQ was not set, but we cannot directly probe this bit,
and short of checking, we may end-up trapping to EL3, and the
firmware may not be please to get such an exception. Yes, this
is dumb.
Instead, let's use PMR to find out if its value gets affected by
SCR_EL3.FIQ being set. We use the fact that when SCR_EL3.FIQ is
set, the LSB of the priority is lost due to the shifting back and
forth of the actual priority. If we read back a 0, we know that
Group0 is unavailable. In case we read a non-zero value, we can
safely reset the AP0Rn register.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Currently a SIGFPE delivered in response to a floating-point
exception trap may have si_code set to 0 on arm64. As reported by
Eric, this is a bad idea since this is the value of SI_USER -- yet
this signal is definitely not the result of kill(2), tgkill(2) etc.
and si_uid and si_pid make limited sense whereas we do want to
yield a value for si_addr (which doesn't exist for SI_USER).
It's not entirely clear whether the architecure permits a
"spurious" fp exception trap where none of the exception flag bits
in ESR_ELx is set. (IMHO the architectural intent is to forbid
this.) However, it does permit those bits to contain garbage if
the TFV bit in ESR_ELx is 0. That case isn't currently handled at
all and may result in si_code == 0 or si_code containing a FPE_FLT*
constant corresponding to an exception that did not in fact happen.
There is nothing sensible we can return for si_code in such cases,
but SI_USER is certainly not appropriate and will lead to violation
of legitimate userspace assumptions.
This patch allocates a new si_code value FPE_UNKNOWN that at least
does not conflict with any existing SI_* or FPE_* code, and yields
this in si_code for undiagnosable cases. This is probably the best
simplicity/incorrectness tradeoff achieveable without relying on
implementation-dependent features or adding a lot of code. In any
case, there appears to be no perfect solution possible that would
justify a lot of effort here.
Yielding FPE_UNKNOWN when some well-defined fp exception caused the
trap is a violation of POSIX, but this is forced by the
architecture. We have no realistic prospect of yielding the
correct code in such cases. At present I am not aware of any ARMv8
implementation that supports trapped floating-point exceptions in
any case.
The new code may be applicable to other architectures for similar
reasons.
No attempt is made to provide ESR_ELx to userspace in the signal
frame, since architectural limitations mean that it is unlikely to
provide much diagnostic value, doesn't benefit existing software
and would create ABI with no proven purpose. The existing
mechanism for passing it also has problems of its own which may
result in the wrong value being passed to userspace due to
interaction with mm faults. The implied rework does not appear
justified.
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Reported-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
The function SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 was introduced as part of SMC
V1.1 Calling Convention to mitigate CVE-2017-5715. This patch uses
the standard call SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 for Falkor chips instead
of Silicon provider service ID 0xC2001700.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Expose the new features introduced by Arm v8.4 extensions to
Arm v8-A profile.
These include :
1) Data indpendent timing of instructions. (DIT, exposed as HWCAP_DIT)
2) Unaligned atomic instructions and Single-copy atomicity of loads
and stores. (AT, expose as HWCAP_USCAT)
3) LDAPR and STLR instructions with immediate offsets (extension to
LRCPC, exposed as HWCAP_ILRCPC)
4) Flag manipulation instructions (TS, exposed as HWCAP_FLAGM).
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
Now that we started keeping modules within 4 GB of the core kernel
in all cases, we no longer need to special case the adr_l/ldr_l/str_l
macros for modules to deal with them being loaded farther away.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
We're now ready to map our vectors in weird and wonderful locations.
On enabling ARM64_HARDEN_EL2_VECTORS, a vector slot gets allocated
if this hasn't been already done via ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR
and gets mapped outside of the normal RAM region, next to the
idmap.
That way, being able to obtain VBAR_EL2 doesn't reveal the mapping
of the rest of the hypervisor code.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We're about to need to allocate hardening slots from other parts
of the kernel (in order to support ARM64_HARDEN_EL2_VECTORS).
Turn the counter into an atomic_t and make it available to the
rest of the kernel. Also add BP_HARDEN_EL2_SLOTS as the number of
slots instead of the hardcoded 4...
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Until now, all EL2 executable mappings were derived from their
EL1 VA. Since we want to decouple the vectors mapping from
the rest of the hypervisor, we need to be able to map some
text somewhere else.
The "idmap" region (for lack of a better name) is ideally suited
for this, as we have a huge range that hardly has anything in it.
Let's extend the IO allocator to also deal with executable mappings,
thus providing the required feature.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
So far, the branch from the vector slots to the main vectors can at
most be 4GB from the main vectors (the reach of ADRP), and this
distance is known at compile time. If we were to remap the slots
to an unrelated VA, things would break badly.
A way to achieve VA independence would be to load the absolute
address of the vectors (__kvm_hyp_vector), either using a constant
pool or a series of movs, followed by an indirect branch.
This patches implements the latter solution, using another instance
of a patching callback. Note that since we have to save a register
pair on the stack, we branch to the *second* instruction in the
vectors in order to compensate for it. This also results in having
to adjust this balance in the invalid vector entry point.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
There is no reason why the BP hardening vectors shouldn't be part
of the HYP text at compile time, rather than being mapped at runtime.
Also introduce a new config symbol that controls the compilation
of bpi.S.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We currently provide the hyp-init code with a kernel VA, and expect
it to turn it into a HYP va by itself. As we're about to provide
the hypervisor with mappings that are not necessarily in the memory
range, let's move the kern_hyp_va macro to kvm_get_hyp_vector.
No functionnal change.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
The main idea behind randomising the EL2 VA is that we usually have
a few spare bits between the most significant bit of the VA mask
and the most significant bit of the linear mapping.
Those bits could be a bunch of zeroes, and could be useful
to move things around a bit. Of course, the more memory you have,
the less randomisation you get...
Alternatively, these bits could be the result of KASLR, in which
case they are already random. But it would be nice to have a
*different* randomization, just to make the job of a potential
attacker a bit more difficult.
Inserting these random bits is a bit involved. We don't have a spare
register (short of rewriting all the kern_hyp_va call sites), and
the immediate we want to insert is too random to be used with the
ORR instruction. The best option I could come up with is the following
sequence:
and x0, x0, #va_mask
ror x0, x0, #first_random_bit
add x0, x0, #(random & 0xfff)
add x0, x0, #(random >> 12), lsl #12
ror x0, x0, #(63 - first_random_bit)
making it a fairly long sequence, but one that a decent CPU should
be able to execute without breaking a sweat. It is of course NOPed
out on VHE. The last 4 instructions can also be turned into NOPs
if it appears that there is no free bits to use.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Add an encoder for the EXTR instruction, which also implements the ROR
variant (where Rn == Rm).
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
As we're about to change the way we map devices at HYP, we need
to move away from kern_hyp_va on an IO address.
One way of achieving this is to store the VAs in kvm_vgic_global_state,
and use that directly from the HYP code. This requires a small change
to create_hyp_io_mappings so that it can also return a HYP VA.
We take this opportunity to nuke the vctrl_base field in the emulated
distributor, as it is not used anymore.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Both HYP io mappings call ioremap, followed by create_hyp_io_mappings.
Let's move the ioremap call into create_hyp_io_mappings itself, which
simplifies the code a bit and allows for further refactoring.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
kvm_vgic_global_state is part of the read-only section, and is
usually accessed using a PC-relative address generation (adrp + add).
It is thus useless to use kern_hyp_va() on it, and actively problematic
if kern_hyp_va() becomes non-idempotent. On the other hand, there is
no way that the compiler is going to guarantee that such access is
always PC relative.
So let's bite the bullet and provide our own accessor.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Now that we can dynamically compute the kernek/hyp VA mask, there
is no need for a feature flag to trigger the alternative patching.
Let's drop the flag and everything that depends on it.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
So far, we're using a complicated sequence of alternatives to
patch the kernel/hyp VA mask on non-VHE, and NOP out the
masking altogether when on VHE.
The newly introduced dynamic patching gives us the opportunity
to simplify that code by patching a single instruction with
the correct mask (instead of the mind bending cumulative masking
we have at the moment) or even a single NOP on VHE. This also
adds some initial code that will allow the patching callback
to switch to a more complex patching.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We lack a way to encode operations such as AND, ORR, EOR that take
an immediate value. Doing so is quite involved, and is all about
reverse engineering the decoding algorithm described in the
pseudocode function DecodeBitMasks().
This has been tested by feeding it all the possible literal values
and comparing the output with that of GAS.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We're missing the a way to generate the encoding of the N immediate,
which is only a single bit used in a number of instruction that take
an immediate.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We've so far relied on a patching infrastructure that only gave us
a single alternative, without any way to provide a range of potential
replacement instructions. For a single feature, this is an all or
nothing thing.
It would be interesting to have a more flexible grained way of patching
the kernel though, where we could dynamically tune the code that gets
injected.
In order to achive this, let's introduce a new form of dynamic patching,
assiciating a callback to a patching site. This callback gets source and
target locations of the patching request, as well as the number of
instructions to be patched.
Dynamic patching is declared with the new ALTERNATIVE_CB and alternative_cb
directives:
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_CB("mov %0, #0\n", callback)
: "r" (v));
or
alternative_cb callback
mov x0, #0
alternative_cb_end
where callback is the C function computing the alternative.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We can finally get completely rid of any calls to the VGICv3
save/restore functions when the AP lists are empty on VHE systems. This
requires carefully factoring out trap configuration from saving and
restoring state, and carefully choosing what to do on the VHE and
non-VHE path.
One of the challenges is that we cannot save/restore the VMCR lazily
because we can only write the VMCR when ICC_SRE_EL1.SRE is cleared when
emulating a GICv2-on-GICv3, since otherwise all Group-0 interrupts end
up being delivered as FIQ.
To solve this problem, and still provide fast performance in the fast
path of exiting a VM when no interrupts are pending (which also
optimized the latency for actually delivering virtual interrupts coming
from physical interrupts), we orchestrate a dance of only doing the
activate/deactivate traps in vgic load/put for VHE systems (which can
have ICC_SRE_EL1.SRE cleared when running in the host), and doing the
configuration on every round-trip on non-VHE systems.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
The APRs can only have bits set when the guest acknowledges an interrupt
in the LR and can only have a bit cleared when the guest EOIs an
interrupt in the LR. Therefore, if we have no LRs with any
pending/active interrupts, the APR cannot change value and there is no
need to clear it on every exit from the VM (hint: it will have already
been cleared when we exited the guest the last time with the LRs all
EOIed).
The only case we need to take care of is when we migrate the VCPU away
from a CPU or migrate a new VCPU onto a CPU, or when we return to
userspace to capture the state of the VCPU for migration. To make sure
this works, factor out the APR save/restore functionality into separate
functions called from the VCPU (and by extension VGIC) put/load hooks.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We can program the GICv2 hypervisor control interface logic directly
from the core vgic code and can instead do the save/restore directly
from the flush/sync functions, which can lead to a number of future
optimizations.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We do not have to change the c15 trap setting on each switch to/from the
guest on VHE systems, because this setting only affects guest EL1/EL0
(and therefore not the VHE host).
The PMU and debug trap configuration can also be done on vcpu load/put
instead, because they don't affect how the VHE host kernel can access the
debug registers while executing KVM kernel code.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
32-bit registers are not used by a 64-bit host kernel and can be
deferred, but we need to rework the accesses to these register to access
the latest values depending on whether or not guest system registers are
loaded on the CPU or only reside in memory.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
ELR_EL1 is not used by a VHE host kernel and can be deferred, but we
need to rework the accesses to this register to access the latest value
depending on whether or not guest system registers are loaded on the CPU
or only reside in memory.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
SPSR_EL1 is not used by a VHE host kernel and can be deferred, but we
need to rework the accesses to this register to access the latest value
depending on whether or not guest system registers are loaded on the CPU
or only reside in memory.
The handling of accessing the various banked SPSRs for 32-bit VMs is a
bit clunky, but this will be improved in following patches which will
first prepare and subsequently implement deferred save/restore of the
32-bit registers, including the 32-bit SPSRs.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We are about to defer saving and restoring some groups of system
registers to vcpu_put and vcpu_load on supported systems. This means
that we need some infrastructure to access system registes which
supports either accessing the memory backing of the register or directly
accessing the system registers, depending on the state of the system
when we access the register.
We do this by defining read/write accessor functions, which can handle
both "immediate" and "deferrable" system registers. Immediate registers
are always saved/restored in the world-switch path, but deferrable
registers are only saved/restored in vcpu_put/vcpu_load when supported
and sysregs_loaded_on_cpu will be set in that case.
Note that we don't use the deferred mechanism yet in this patch, but only
introduce infrastructure. This is to improve convenience of review in
the subsequent patches where it is clear which registers become
deferred.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Currently we access the system registers array via the vcpu_sys_reg()
macro. However, we are about to change the behavior to some times
modify the register file directly, so let's change this to two
primitives:
* Accessor macros vcpu_write_sys_reg() and vcpu_read_sys_reg()
* Direct array access macro __vcpu_sys_reg()
The accessor macros should be used in places where the code needs to
access the currently loaded VCPU's state as observed by the guest. For
example, when trapping on cache related registers, a write to a system
register should go directly to the VCPU version of the register.
The direct array access macro can be used in places where the VCPU is
known to never be running (for example userspace access) or for
registers which are never context switched (for example all the PMU
system registers).
This rewrites all users of vcpu_sys_regs to one of the macros described
above.
No functional change.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We currently handle 32-bit accesses to trapped VM system registers using
the 32-bit index into the coproc array on the vcpu structure, which is a
union of the coproc array and the sysreg array.
Since all the 32-bit coproc indices are created to correspond to the
architectural mapping between 64-bit system registers and 32-bit
coprocessor registers, and because the AArch64 system registers are the
double in size of the AArch32 coprocessor registers, we can always find
the system register entry that we must update by dividing the 32-bit
coproc index by 2.
This is going to make our lives much easier when we have to start
accessing system registers that use deferred save/restore and might
have to be read directly from the physical CPU.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
There is no need to have multiple identical functions with different
names for saving host and guest state. When saving and restoring state
for the host and guest, the state is the same for both contexts, and
that's why we have the kvm_cpu_context structure. Delete one
version and rename the other into simply save/restore.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
As we are about to handle system registers quite differently between VHE
and non-VHE systems. In preparation for that, we need to split some of
the handling functions between VHE and non-VHE functionality.
For now, we simply copy the non-VHE functions, but we do change the use
of static keys for VHE and non-VHE functionality now that we have
separate functions.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
So far this is mostly (see below) a copy of the legacy non-VHE switch
function, but we will start reworking these functions in separate
directions to work on VHE and non-VHE in the most optimal way in later
patches.
The only difference after this patch between the VHE and non-VHE run
functions is that we omit the branch-predictor variant-2 hardening for
QC Falkor CPUs, because this workaround is specific to a series of
non-VHE ARMv8.0 CPUs.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Instead of having multiple calls from the world switch path to the debug
logic, each figuring out if the dirty bit is set and if we should
save/restore the debug registers, let's just provide two hooks to the
debug save/restore functionality, one for switching to the guest
context, and one for switching to the host context, and we get the
benefit of only having to evaluate the dirty flag once on each path,
plus we give the compiler some more room to inline some of this
functionality.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We have numerous checks around that checks if the HCR_EL2 has the RW bit
set to figure out if we're running an AArch64 or AArch32 VM. In some
cases, directly checking the RW bit (given its unintuitive name), is a
bit confusing, and that's not going to improve as we move logic around
for the following patches that optimize KVM on AArch64 hosts with VHE.
Therefore, introduce a helper, vcpu_el1_is_32bit, and replace existing
direct checks of HCR_EL2.RW with the helper.
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
As we are about to move a bunch of save/restore logic for VHE kernels to
the load and put functions, we need some infrastructure to do this.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We currently have a separate read-modify-write of the HCR_EL2 on entry
to the guest for the sole purpose of setting the VF and VI bits, if set.
Since this is most rarely the case (only when using userspace IRQ chip
and interrupts are in flight), let's get rid of this operation and
instead modify the bits in the vcpu->arch.hcr[_el2] directly when
needed.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We always set the IMO and FMO bits in the HCR_EL2 when running the
guest, regardless if we use the vgic or not. By moving these flags to
HCR_GUEST_FLAGS we can avoid one of the extra save/restore operations of
HCR_EL2 in the world switch code, and we can also soon get rid of the
other one.
This is safe, because even though the IMO and FMO bits control both
taking the interrupts to EL2 and remapping ICC_*_EL1 to ICV_*_EL1 when
executed at EL1, as long as we ensure that these bits are clear when
running the EL1 host, we're OK, because we reset the HCR_EL2 to only
have the HCR_RW bit set when returning to EL1 on non-VHE systems.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shih-Wei Li <shihwei@cs.columbia.edu>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
We already have the percpu area for the host cpu state, which points to
the VCPU, so there's no need to store the VCPU pointer on the stack on
every context switch. We can be a little more clever and just use
tpidr_el2 for the percpu offset and load the VCPU pointer from the host
context.
This has the benefit of being able to retrieve the host context even
when our stack is corrupted, and it has a potential performance benefit
because we trade a store plus a load for an mrs and a load on a round
trip to the guest.
This does require us to calculate the percpu offset without including
the offset from the kernel mapping of the percpu array to the linear
mapping of the array (which is what we store in tpidr_el1), because a
PC-relative generated address in EL2 is already giving us the hyp alias
of the linear mapping of a kernel address. We do this in
__cpu_init_hyp_mode() by using kvm_ksym_ref().
The code that accesses ESR_EL2 was previously using an alternative to
use the _EL1 accessor on VHE systems, but this was actually unnecessary
as the _EL1 accessor aliases the ESR_EL2 register on VHE, and the _EL2
accessor does the same thing on both systems.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
The DCache clean & ICache invalidation requirements for instructions
to be data coherence are discoverable through new fields in CTR_EL0.
The following two control bits DIC and IDC were defined for this
purpose. No need to perform point of unification cache maintenance
operations from software on systems where CPU caches are transparent.
This patch optimize the three functions __flush_cache_user_range(),
clean_dcache_area_pou() and invalidate_icache_range() if the hardware
reports CTR_EL0.IDC and/or CTR_EL0.IDC. Basically it skips the two
instructions 'DC CVAU' and 'IC IVAU', and the associated loop logic
in order to avoid the unnecessary overhead.
CTR_EL0.DIC: Instruction cache invalidation requirements for
instruction to data coherence. The meaning of this bit[29].
0: Instruction cache invalidation to the point of unification
is required for instruction to data coherence.
1: Instruction cache cleaning to the point of unification is
not required for instruction to data coherence.
CTR_EL0.IDC: Data cache clean requirements for instruction to data
coherence. The meaning of this bit[28].
0: Data cache clean to the point of unification is required for
instruction to data coherence, unless CLIDR_EL1.LoC == 0b000
or (CLIDR_EL1.LoUIS == 0b000 && CLIDR_EL1.LoUU == 0b000).
1: Data cache clean to the point of unification is not required
for instruction to data coherence.
Co-authored-by: Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
Omit patching of ADRP instruction at module load time if the current
CPUs are not susceptible to the erratum.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
[will: Drop duplicate initialisation of .def_scope field]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
In some cases, core variants that are affected by a certain erratum
also exist in versions that have the erratum fixed, and this fact is
recorded in a dedicated bit in system register REVIDR_EL1.
Since the architecture does not require that a certain bit retains
its meaning across different variants of the same model, each such
REVIDR bit is tightly coupled to a certain revision/variant value,
and so we need a list of revidr_mask/midr pairs to carry this
information.
So add the struct member and the associated macros and handling to
allow REVIDR fixes to be taken into account.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
Working around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419 involves special handling of
ADRP instructions that end up in the last two instruction slots of a
4k page, or whose output register gets overwritten without having been
read. (Note that the latter instruction sequence is never emitted by
a properly functioning compiler, which is why it is disregarded by the
handling of the same erratum in the bfd.ld linker which we rely on for
the core kernel)
Normally, this gets taken care of by the linker, which can spot such
sequences at final link time, and insert a veneer if the ADRP ends up
at a vulnerable offset. However, linux kernel modules are partially
linked ELF objects, and so there is no 'final link time' other than the
runtime loading of the module, at which time all the static relocations
are resolved.
For this reason, we have implemented the #843419 workaround for modules
by avoiding ADRP instructions altogether, by using the large C model,
and by passing -mpc-relative-literal-loads to recent versions of GCC
that may emit adrp/ldr pairs to perform literal loads. However, this
workaround forces us to keep literal data mixed with the instructions
in the executable .text segment, and literal data may inadvertently
turn into an exploitable speculative gadget depending on the relative
offsets of arbitrary symbols.
So let's reimplement this workaround in a way that allows us to switch
back to the small C model, and to drop the -mpc-relative-literal-loads
GCC switch, by patching affected ADRP instructions at runtime:
- ADRP instructions that do not appear at 4k relative offset 0xff8 or
0xffc are ignored
- ADRP instructions that are within 1 MB of their target symbol are
converted into ADR instructions
- remaining ADRP instructions are redirected via a veneer that performs
the load using an unaffected movn/movk sequence.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
[will: tidied up ADRP -> ADR instruction patching.]
[will: use ULL suffix for 64-bit immediate]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
|
Whether or not we will ever decide to start using x18 as a platform
register in Linux is uncertain, but by that time, we will need to
ensure that UEFI runtime services calls don't corrupt it.
So let's start issuing warnings now for this, and increase the
likelihood that these firmware images have all been replaced by that time.
This has been fixed on the EDK2 side in commit:
6d73863b5464 ("BaseTools/tools_def AARCH64: mark register x18 as reserved")
dated July 13, 2017.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180308080020.22828-6-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
TCR_EL1.NFD1 was allocated by SVE and ensures that fault-surpressing SVE
memory accesses (e.g. speculative accesses from a first-fault gather load)
which translate via TTBR1_EL1 result in a translation fault if they
miss in the TLB when executed from EL0. This mitigates some timing attacks
against KASLR, where the kernel address space could otherwise be probed
efficiently using the FFR in conjunction with suppressed faults on SVE
loads.
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
