summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-08-14ARM: remove w90x900 platformArnd Bergmann1-121/+0
This removes the old Winbond w90x900 platform, also known as Nuvoton NUC900. Wan Zongshun originally contributed the port and maintained it since then. From all I can tell, this platform is no longer being used with modern kernels, based on various indications: - The supported chips (nuc910/950/960) are no longer marketed by the manufacturer - Newer chips from the same family (nuc97x, nuc980, n329x) that are still marketed have Linux BSPs but those were never submitted for upstream inclusion. - The last patch from the platform maintainer was in 2011. - All patches to w90x900 platform specific files afterwards are cleanups that were apparently done without access to test hardware. - Both the website and the email address listed in the MAINTAINERS have become unreachable. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809202749.742267-17-arnd@arndb.de Cc: "Wanzongshun (Vincent)" <wanzongshun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2019-05-30treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 178Thomas Gleixner1-4/+1
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 24 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528170026.162703968@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-07-27ARM: w90x900: normalize clk APIArnd Bergmann1-0/+29
w90x900 still provides its own variant of the clk API rather than using the generic COMMON_CLK API. This generally works, but it causes some link errors with drivers using the clk_set_rate, clk_get_parent, clk_set_parent or clk_round_rate functions when a platform lacks those interfaces. This adds empty stub implementations for each of them, and I don't even try to do something useful here but instead just print a WARN() message to make it obvious what is going on if they ever end up being called. The drivers that call these won't be used on these platforms (otherwise we'd get a link error today), so the added code is harmless bloat and will warn about accidental use. A while ago there was a proposal to change w90x900 to use the common-clk implementation, which would be the way it should be handled properly. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2017-03-30ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately if clk is NULLMasahiro Yamada1-0/+3
In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions. Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call clk_disable() without NULL pointer check. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2010-02-12ARM: Consolidate clks_register() and similarRussell King1-9/+0
Most machine classes want some way to register a block of clk_lookup structures, and most do it by implementing a clks_register() type function which walks an array, or by open-coding a loop. Consolidate all this into clkdev_add_table(). Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-09-02ARM: 5682/1: Add cpu.c and dev.c and modify some files of w90p910 platformwanzongshun1-2/+2
Add the cpu.c and dev.c and modify w90p910 platform to apply to use the common API(provided by cpu.c and dev.c) at the same time, I renamed all w90x900 to nuc900 in every c file of w90x900 platform and touchscreen's driver name. Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-08-15ARM: 5674/1: Add clocksource/clockevent support for w90p910 platformwanzongshun1-0/+6
Add clocksource/clockevent support for w90p910 platform. Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-07-17[ARM] 5602/1: Add sub clock api for w90p910 platformwanzongshun1-0/+18
Add sub clock api for w90p910 platform. Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2009-06-11[ARM] 5549/1: Add clock api for w90p910 platform.wanzongshun1-0/+77
Add clock api for w90p910 platform. Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>