| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Use irq_set_chip_and_handler() instead. Converted with coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
Convert to the new function names. Automated with coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
This uncouple PHYS_OFFSET from the platform definitions, thereby
facilitating run-time computation of the physical memory offset.
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Acked-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Acked-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiandong Zheng <jdzheng@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
|
|
factorise some generic infrastructure to assist looking up struct clks
for the ARM & SH architecture.
as the code is identical at 99%
put the arch specific code for allocation as example in asm/clkdev.h
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Since we're now using addruart to establish the debug mapping, we can
remove the io_pg_offst and phys_io members of struct machine_desc.
The various declarations were removed using the following script:
grep -rl MACHINE_START arch/arm | xargs \
sed -i '/MACHINE_START/,/MACHINE_END/ { /\.\(phys_io\|io_pg_offst\)/d }'
[ Initial patch was from Jeremy Kerr, example script from Russell King ]
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao at canonical.com>
|
|
The previous nuc932 support patches have been discarded by me and because it belongs to
another SoCs series named nuc93x,at present, which included nuc931 and nuc932, I think it is
better to create a new mach-nuc93x,So I made the patch,and request your advice.Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
