summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-10-06locktorture: Support rtmutex torturingDavidlohr Bueso1-0/+3
Real time mutexes is one of the few general primitives that we do not have in locktorture. Address this -- a few considerations: o To spice things up, enable competing thread(s) to become rt, such that we can stress different prio boosting paths in the rtmutex code. Introduce a ->task_boost callback, only used by rtmutex-torturer. Tasks will boost/deboost around every 50k (arbitrarily) lock/unlock operations. o Hold times are similar to what we have for other locks: only occasionally having longer hold times (per ~200k ops). So we roughly do two full rt boost+deboosting ops with short hold times. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
2014-09-30locktorture: Support rwlocksDavidlohr Bueso1-0/+5
Add a "rw_lock" torture test to stress kernel rwlocks and their irq variant. Reader critical regions are 5x longer than writers. As such a similar ratio of lock acquisitions is seen in the statistics. In the case of massive contention, both hold the lock for 1/10 of a second. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-17locktorture: Support rwsemsDavidlohr Bueso1-0/+2
We can easily do so with our new reader lock support. Just an arbitrary design default: readers have higher (5x) critical region latencies than writers: 50 ms and 10 ms, respectively. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-17locktorture: Add infrastructure for torturing read locksDavidlohr Bueso1-4/+12
Most of it is based on what we already have for writers. This allows readers to be very independent (and thus configurable), enabling future module parameters to control things such as rw distribution. Furthermore, readers have their own delaying function, allowing us to test different rw critical region latencies, and stress locking internals. Similarly, statistics, for now will only serve for the number of lock acquisitions -- as opposed to writers, readers have no failure detection. In addition, introduce a new nreaders_stress module parameter. The default number of readers will be the same number of writers threads. Writer threads are interleaved with readers. Documentation is updated, respectively. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-17locktorture: Support mutexesDavidlohr Bueso1-0/+2
Add a "mutex_lock" torture test. The main difference with the already existing spinlock tests is that the latency of the critical region is much larger. We randomly delay for (arbitrarily) either 500 ms or, otherwise, 25 ms. While this can considerably reduce the amount of writes compared to non blocking locks, if run long enough it can have the same torturous effect. Furthermore it is more representative of mutex hold times and can stress better things like thrashing. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-17locktorture: Add documentationDavidlohr Bueso1-0/+130
Just like Documentation/RCU/torture.txt, begin a document for the locktorture module. This module is still pretty green, so I have just added some specific sections to the doc (general desc, params, usage, etc.). Further development should update the file. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> [ paulmck: Apply Randy Dunlap review comments. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>