diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/ip_gre.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/ip_gre.c | 35 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c b/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c index 2b53a1f7abf6..6ef66af12291 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ it is infeasible task. The most general solutions would be to keep skb->encapsulation counter (sort of local ttl), and silently drop packet when it expires. It is a good - solution, but it supposes maintaing new variable in ALL + solution, but it supposes maintaining new variable in ALL skb, even if no tunneling is used. Current solution: xmit_recursion breaks dead loops. This is a percpu @@ -91,14 +91,14 @@ One of them is to parse packet trying to detect inner encapsulation made by our node. It is difficult or even impossible, especially, - taking into account fragmentation. TO be short, tt is not solution at all. + taking into account fragmentation. TO be short, ttl is not solution at all. Current solution: The solution was UNEXPECTEDLY SIMPLE. We force DF flag on tunnels with preconfigured hop limit, that is ALL. :-) Well, it does not remove the problem completely, but exponential growth of network traffic is changed to linear (branches, that exceed pmtu are pruned) and tunnel mtu - fastly degrades to value <68, where looping stops. + rapidly degrades to value <68, where looping stops. Yes, it is not good if there exists a router in the loop, which does not force DF, even when encapsulating packets have DF set. But it is not our problem! Nobody could accuse us, we made @@ -422,6 +422,10 @@ static struct ip_tunnel *ipgre_tunnel_locate(struct net *net, if (register_netdevice(dev) < 0) goto failed_free; + /* Can use a lockless transmit, unless we generate output sequences */ + if (!(nt->parms.o_flags & GRE_SEQ)) + dev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX; + dev_hold(dev); ipgre_tunnel_link(ign, nt); return nt; @@ -453,8 +457,8 @@ static void ipgre_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info) GRE tunnels with enabled checksum. Tell them "thank you". Well, I wonder, rfc1812 was written by Cisco employee, - what the hell these idiots break standrads established - by themself??? + what the hell these idiots break standards established + by themselves??? */ const struct iphdr *iph = (const struct iphdr *)skb->data; @@ -726,15 +730,16 @@ static netdev_tx_t ipgre_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) { rt = skb_rtable(skb); - if ((dst = rt->rt_gateway) == 0) - goto tx_error_icmp; + dst = rt->rt_gateway; } #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) { - struct neighbour *neigh = dst_get_neighbour_noref(skb_dst(skb)); const struct in6_addr *addr6; + struct neighbour *neigh; + bool do_tx_error_icmp; int addr_type; + neigh = dst_neigh_lookup(skb_dst(skb), &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr); if (neigh == NULL) goto tx_error; @@ -747,9 +752,14 @@ static netdev_tx_t ipgre_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev } if ((addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_COMPATv4) == 0) + do_tx_error_icmp = true; + else { + do_tx_error_icmp = false; + dst = addr6->s6_addr32[3]; + } + neigh_release(neigh); + if (do_tx_error_icmp) goto tx_error_icmp; - - dst = addr6->s6_addr32[3]; } #endif else @@ -910,9 +920,10 @@ static netdev_tx_t ipgre_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev __IPTUNNEL_XMIT(tstats, &dev->stats); return NETDEV_TX_OK; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) tx_error_icmp: dst_link_failure(skb); - +#endif tx_error: dev->stats.tx_errors++; dev_kfree_skb(skb); @@ -1525,7 +1536,7 @@ static int ipgre_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev, struct nla return -EEXIST; if (dev->type == ARPHRD_ETHER && !tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) - random_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr); + eth_hw_addr_random(dev); mtu = ipgre_tunnel_bind_dev(dev); if (!tb[IFLA_MTU]) |