diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ubifs/budget.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ubifs/budget.c | 37 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/budget.c b/fs/ubifs/budget.c index f393620890ee..af1914462f02 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/budget.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/budget.c @@ -194,29 +194,26 @@ static int make_free_space(struct ubifs_info *c) } /** - * ubifs_calc_min_idx_lebs - calculate amount of eraseblocks for the index. + * ubifs_calc_min_idx_lebs - calculate amount of LEBs for the index. * @c: UBIFS file-system description object * - * This function calculates and returns the number of eraseblocks which should - * be kept for index usage. + * This function calculates and returns the number of LEBs which should be kept + * for index usage. */ int ubifs_calc_min_idx_lebs(struct ubifs_info *c) { - int idx_lebs, eff_leb_size = c->leb_size - c->max_idx_node_sz; + int idx_lebs; long long idx_size; idx_size = c->old_idx_sz + c->budg_idx_growth + c->budg_uncommitted_idx; - /* And make sure we have thrice the index size of space reserved */ - idx_size = idx_size + (idx_size << 1); - + idx_size += idx_size << 1; /* * We do not maintain 'old_idx_size' as 'old_idx_lebs'/'old_idx_bytes' * pair, nor similarly the two variables for the new index size, so we * have to do this costly 64-bit division on fast-path. */ - idx_size += eff_leb_size - 1; - idx_lebs = div_u64(idx_size, eff_leb_size); + idx_lebs = div_u64(idx_size + c->idx_leb_size - 1, c->idx_leb_size); /* * The index head is not available for the in-the-gaps method, so add an * extra LEB to compensate. @@ -310,23 +307,23 @@ static int can_use_rp(struct ubifs_info *c) * do_budget_space - reserve flash space for index and data growth. * @c: UBIFS file-system description object * - * This function makes sure UBIFS has enough free eraseblocks for index growth - * and data. + * This function makes sure UBIFS has enough free LEBs for index growth and + * data. * * When budgeting index space, UBIFS reserves thrice as many LEBs as the index * would take if it was consolidated and written to the flash. This guarantees * that the "in-the-gaps" commit method always succeeds and UBIFS will always * be able to commit dirty index. So this function basically adds amount of * budgeted index space to the size of the current index, multiplies this by 3, - * and makes sure this does not exceed the amount of free eraseblocks. + * and makes sure this does not exceed the amount of free LEBs. * * Notes about @c->min_idx_lebs and @c->lst.idx_lebs variables: * o @c->lst.idx_lebs is the number of LEBs the index currently uses. It might * be large, because UBIFS does not do any index consolidation as long as * there is free space. IOW, the index may take a lot of LEBs, but the LEBs * will contain a lot of dirt. - * o @c->min_idx_lebs is the the index presumably takes. IOW, the index may be - * consolidated to take up to @c->min_idx_lebs LEBs. + * o @c->min_idx_lebs is the number of LEBS the index presumably takes. IOW, + * the index may be consolidated to take up to @c->min_idx_lebs LEBs. * * This function returns zero in case of success, and %-ENOSPC in case of * failure. @@ -695,12 +692,12 @@ long long ubifs_reported_space(const struct ubifs_info *c, long long free) * This function calculates amount of free space to report to user-space. * * Because UBIFS may introduce substantial overhead (the index, node headers, - * alignment, wastage at the end of eraseblocks, etc), it cannot report real - * amount of free flash space it has (well, because not all dirty space is - * reclaimable, UBIFS does not actually know the real amount). If UBIFS did so, - * it would bread user expectations about what free space is. Users seem to - * accustomed to assume that if the file-system reports N bytes of free space, - * they would be able to fit a file of N bytes to the FS. This almost works for + * alignment, wastage at the end of LEBs, etc), it cannot report real amount of + * free flash space it has (well, because not all dirty space is reclaimable, + * UBIFS does not actually know the real amount). If UBIFS did so, it would + * bread user expectations about what free space is. Users seem to accustomed + * to assume that if the file-system reports N bytes of free space, they would + * be able to fit a file of N bytes to the FS. This almost works for * traditional file-systems, because they have way less overhead than UBIFS. * So, to keep users happy, UBIFS tries to take the overhead into account. */ |