summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/ppc64/kernel/machine_kexec.c6
-rw-r--r--arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.c4
-rw-r--r--arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.h2
-rw-r--r--arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c31
4 files changed, 22 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/arch/ppc64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/ppc64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
index 5c40bb6788df..4775f12a013c 100644
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ void kexec_copy_flush(struct kimage *image)
void kexec_smp_down(void *arg)
{
if (ppc_md.cpu_irq_down)
- ppc_md.cpu_irq_down();
+ ppc_md.cpu_irq_down(1);
local_irq_disable();
kexec_smp_wait();
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static void kexec_prepare_cpus(void)
/* after we tell the others to go down */
if (ppc_md.cpu_irq_down)
- ppc_md.cpu_irq_down();
+ ppc_md.cpu_irq_down(0);
put_cpu();
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static void kexec_prepare_cpus(void)
*/
smp_release_cpus();
if (ppc_md.cpu_irq_down)
- ppc_md.cpu_irq_down();
+ ppc_md.cpu_irq_down(0);
local_irq_disable();
}
diff --git a/arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.c b/arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.c
index e8fbab1df37f..cc262a05ddb4 100644
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.c
@@ -794,10 +794,10 @@ void mpic_setup_this_cpu(void)
/*
* XXX: someone who knows mpic should check this.
- * do we need to eoi the ipi here (see xics comments)?
+ * do we need to eoi the ipi including for kexec cpu here (see xics comments)?
* or can we reset the mpic in the new kernel?
*/
-void mpic_teardown_this_cpu(void)
+void mpic_teardown_this_cpu(int secondary)
{
struct mpic *mpic = mpic_primary;
unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.h b/arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.h
index 99fbbc9a084c..ca78a7f10528 100644
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.h
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/mpic.h
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ extern unsigned int mpic_irq_get_priority(unsigned int irq);
extern void mpic_setup_this_cpu(void);
/* Clean up for kexec (or cpu offline or ...) */
-extern void mpic_teardown_this_cpu(void);
+extern void mpic_teardown_this_cpu(int secondary);
/* Request IPIs on primary mpic */
extern void mpic_request_ipis(void);
diff --git a/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c b/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c
index 677c4450984a..d9dc6f28d050 100644
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/xics.c
@@ -647,29 +647,30 @@ static void xics_set_affinity(unsigned int virq, cpumask_t cpumask)
}
}
-void xics_teardown_cpu(void)
+void xics_teardown_cpu(int secondary)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- int status;
ops->cppr_info(cpu, 0x00);
iosync();
/*
- * we need to EOI the IPI if we got here from kexec down IPI
- *
- * xics doesn't care if we duplicate an EOI as long as we
- * don't EOI and raise priority.
- *
- * probably need to check all the other interrupts too
- * should we be flagging idle loop instead?
- * or creating some task to be scheduled?
+ * Some machines need to have at least one cpu in the GIQ,
+ * so leave the master cpu in the group.
*/
- ops->xirr_info_set(cpu, XICS_IPI);
-
- status = rtas_set_indicator(GLOBAL_INTERRUPT_QUEUE,
- (1UL << interrupt_server_size) - 1 - default_distrib_server, 0);
- WARN_ON(status != 0);
+ if (secondary) {
+ /*
+ * we need to EOI the IPI if we got here from kexec down IPI
+ *
+ * probably need to check all the other interrupts too
+ * should we be flagging idle loop instead?
+ * or creating some task to be scheduled?
+ */
+ ops->xirr_info_set(cpu, XICS_IPI);
+ rtas_set_indicator(GLOBAL_INTERRUPT_QUEUE,
+ (1UL << interrupt_server_size) - 1 -
+ default_distrib_server, 0);
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU