diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst | 11 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst index a96a423e3779..37940a0584ec 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst @@ -528,6 +528,10 @@ object corresponding to it, as follows: Total number of times the hardware has been asked by the given CPU to enter this idle state. +``rejected`` + Total number of times a request to enter this idle state on the given + CPU was rejected. + The :file:`desc` and :file:`name` files both contain strings. The difference between them is that the name is expected to be more concise, while the description may be longer and it may contain white space or special characters. @@ -572,6 +576,11 @@ particular case. For these reasons, the only reliable way to find out how much time has been spent by the hardware in different idle states supported by it is to use idle state residency counters in the hardware, if available. +Generally, an interrupt received when trying to enter an idle state causes the +idle state entry request to be rejected, in which case the ``CPUIdle`` driver +may return an error code to indicate that this was the case. The :file:`usage` +and :file:`rejected` files report the number of times the given idle state +was entered successfully or rejected, respectively. .. _cpu-pm-qos: @@ -690,7 +699,7 @@ which of the two parameters is added to the kernel command line. In the instruction of the CPUs (which, as a rule, suspends the execution of the program and causes the hardware to attempt to enter the shallowest available idle state) for this purpose, and if ``idle=poll`` is used, idle CPUs will execute a -more or less ``lightweight'' sequence of instructions in a tight loop. [Note +more or less "lightweight" sequence of instructions in a tight loop. [Note that using ``idle=poll`` is somewhat drastic in many cases, as preventing idle CPUs from saving almost any energy at all may not be the only effect of it. For example, on Intel hardware it effectively prevents CPUs from using |