diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst index 04ed8bf27a0e..a0f8164c8513 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst @@ -1844,10 +1844,10 @@ that meets this requirement. Furthermore, NMI handlers can be interrupted by what appear to RCU to be normal interrupts. One way that this can happen is for code that -directly invokes rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() to be called +directly invokes ct_irq_enter() and ct_irq_exit() to be called from an NMI handler. This astonishing fact of life prompted the current -code structure, which has rcu_irq_enter() invoking -rcu_nmi_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() invoking rcu_nmi_exit(). +code structure, which has ct_irq_enter() invoking +ct_nmi_enter() and ct_irq_exit() invoking ct_nmi_exit(). And yes, I also learned of this requirement the hard way. Loadable Modules @@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ scheduling-clock interrupt be enabled when RCU needs it to be: sections, and RCU believes this CPU to be idle, no problem. This sort of thing is used by some architectures for light-weight exception handlers, which can then avoid the overhead of - rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() at exception entry and + ct_irq_enter() and ct_irq_exit() at exception entry and exit, respectively. Some go further and avoid the entireties of irq_enter() and irq_exit(). Just make very sure you are running some of your tests with @@ -2226,7 +2226,7 @@ scheduling-clock interrupt be enabled when RCU needs it to be: +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | **Answer**: | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -| One approach is to do ``rcu_irq_exit();rcu_irq_enter();`` every so | +| One approach is to do ``ct_irq_exit();ct_irq_enter();`` every so | | often. But given that long-running interrupt handlers can cause other | | problems, not least for response time, shouldn't you work to keep | | your interrupt handler's runtime within reasonable bounds? | |