diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 19 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/compiler.h | 18 |
3 files changed, 16 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h index 333a6695a918..0e06df20928c 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h @@ -36,9 +36,3 @@ __has_builtin(__builtin_sub_overflow) #define COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1 #endif - -/* The following are for compatibility with GCC, from compiler-gcc.h, - * and may be redefined here because they should not be shared with other - * compilers, like ICC. - */ -#define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("" : : : "memory") diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h index e8579412ad21..d8fab3ecf512 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h @@ -14,25 +14,6 @@ # error Sorry, your compiler is too old - please upgrade it. #endif -/* Optimization barrier */ - -/* The "volatile" is due to gcc bugs */ -#define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory") -/* - * This version is i.e. to prevent dead stores elimination on @ptr - * where gcc and llvm may behave differently when otherwise using - * normal barrier(): while gcc behavior gets along with a normal - * barrier(), llvm needs an explicit input variable to be assumed - * clobbered. The issue is as follows: while the inline asm might - * access any memory it wants, the compiler could have fit all of - * @ptr into memory registers instead, and since @ptr never escaped - * from that, it proved that the inline asm wasn't touching any of - * it. This version works well with both compilers, i.e. we're telling - * the compiler that the inline asm absolutely may see the contents - * of @ptr. See also: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15495 - */ -#define barrier_data(ptr) __asm__ __volatile__("": :"r"(ptr) :"memory") - /* * This macro obfuscates arithmetic on a variable address so that gcc * shouldn't recognize the original var, and make assumptions about it. diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h index 448c91bf543b..f164a9b12813 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h @@ -80,11 +80,25 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val, /* Optimization barrier */ #ifndef barrier -# define barrier() __memory_barrier() +/* The "volatile" is due to gcc bugs */ +# define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory") #endif #ifndef barrier_data -# define barrier_data(ptr) barrier() +/* + * This version is i.e. to prevent dead stores elimination on @ptr + * where gcc and llvm may behave differently when otherwise using + * normal barrier(): while gcc behavior gets along with a normal + * barrier(), llvm needs an explicit input variable to be assumed + * clobbered. The issue is as follows: while the inline asm might + * access any memory it wants, the compiler could have fit all of + * @ptr into memory registers instead, and since @ptr never escaped + * from that, it proved that the inline asm wasn't touching any of + * it. This version works well with both compilers, i.e. we're telling + * the compiler that the inline asm absolutely may see the contents + * of @ptr. See also: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15495 + */ +# define barrier_data(ptr) __asm__ __volatile__("": :"r"(ptr) :"memory") #endif /* workaround for GCC PR82365 if needed */ |