diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 39 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 2 |
3 files changed, 42 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 8d042f27d644..f96988f283d5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ | X86_CR4_PGE | X86_CR4_PCE | X86_CR4_OSFXSR | X86_CR4_PCIDE \ | X86_CR4_OSXSAVE | X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_FSGSBASE \ | X86_CR4_OSXMMEXCPT | X86_CR4_LA57 | X86_CR4_VMXE \ - | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE | X86_CR4_UMIP)) + | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE | X86_CR4_UMIP \ + | X86_CR4_LAM_SUP)) #define CR8_RESERVED_BITS (~(unsigned long)X86_CR8_TPR) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index d7ff06d77720..3bbe5a9362a9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -7673,6 +7673,9 @@ static void nested_vmx_cr_fixed1_bits_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_UMIP, ecx, feature_bit(UMIP)); cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_LA57, ecx, feature_bit(LA57)); + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index(vcpu, 0x7, 1); + cr4_fixed1_update(X86_CR4_LAM_SUP, eax, feature_bit(LAM)); + #undef cr4_fixed1_update } @@ -8205,9 +8208,43 @@ static void vmx_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm) free_pages((unsigned long)kvm_vmx->pid_table, vmx_get_pid_table_order(kvm)); } +/* + * Note, the SDM states that the linear address is masked *after* the modified + * canonicality check, whereas KVM masks (untags) the address and then performs + * a "normal" canonicality check. Functionally, the two methods are identical, + * and when the masking occurs relative to the canonicality check isn't visible + * to software, i.e. KVM's behavior doesn't violate the SDM. + */ gva_t vmx_get_untagged_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, unsigned int flags) { - return gva; + int lam_bit; + + if (flags & (X86EMUL_F_FETCH | X86EMUL_F_IMPLICIT | X86EMUL_F_INVLPG)) + return gva; + + if (!is_64_bit_mode(vcpu)) + return gva; + + /* + * Bit 63 determines if the address should be treated as user address + * or a supervisor address. + */ + if (!(gva & BIT_ULL(63))) { + /* KVM doesn't yet virtualize LAM_U{48,57}. */ + return gva; + } else { + if (!kvm_is_cr4_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR4_LAM_SUP)) + return gva; + + lam_bit = kvm_is_cr4_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR4_LA57) ? 56 : 47; + } + + /* + * Untag the address by sign-extending the lam_bit, but NOT to bit 63. + * Bit 63 is retained from the raw virtual address so that untagging + * doesn't change a user access to a supervisor access, and vice versa. + */ + return (sign_extend64(gva, lam_bit) & ~BIT_ULL(63)) | (gva & BIT_ULL(63)); } static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __initdata = { diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h index 5184fde1dc54..2f7e19166658 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h @@ -530,6 +530,8 @@ bool kvm_msr_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u32 type); __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_VMXE; \ if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_PCID)) \ __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_PCIDE; \ + if (!__cpu_has(__c, X86_FEATURE_LAM)) \ + __reserved_bits |= X86_CR4_LAM_SUP; \ __reserved_bits; \ }) |