diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c index 253f63fceea1..be6b86078957 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c @@ -259,6 +259,14 @@ void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu) } +/* + * Our init of PV spinlocks is split in two init functions due to us + * using paravirt patching and jump labels patching and having to do + * all of this before SMP code is invoked. + * + * The paravirt patching needs to be done _before_ the alternative asm code + * is started, otherwise we would not patch the core kernel code. + */ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) { @@ -267,12 +275,26 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void) return; } - static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_ticketlocks_enabled); - pv_lock_ops.lock_spinning = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_lock_spinning); pv_lock_ops.unlock_kick = xen_unlock_kick; } +/* + * While the jump_label init code needs to happend _after_ the jump labels are + * enabled and before SMP is started. Hence we use pre-SMP initcall level + * init. We cannot do it in xen_init_spinlocks as that is done before + * jump labels are activated. + */ +static __init int xen_init_spinlocks_jump(void) +{ + if (!xen_pvspin) + return 0; + + static_key_slow_inc(¶virt_ticketlocks_enabled); + return 0; +} +early_initcall(xen_init_spinlocks_jump); + static __init int xen_parse_nopvspin(char *arg) { xen_pvspin = false; |