diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 53 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 60 |
2 files changed, 77 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h index 6bd05700d8c9..05f05f17a7c2 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h @@ -22,37 +22,33 @@ #include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h> /** + * queued_spin_unlock_wait - wait until the _current_ lock holder releases the lock + * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure + * + * There is a very slight possibility of live-lock if the lockers keep coming + * and the waiter is just unfortunate enough to not see any unlock state. + */ +#ifndef queued_spin_unlock_wait +extern void queued_spin_unlock_wait(struct qspinlock *lock); +#endif + +/** * queued_spin_is_locked - is the spinlock locked? * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure * Return: 1 if it is locked, 0 otherwise */ +#ifndef queued_spin_is_locked static __always_inline int queued_spin_is_locked(struct qspinlock *lock) { /* - * queued_spin_lock_slowpath() can ACQUIRE the lock before - * issuing the unordered store that sets _Q_LOCKED_VAL. - * - * See both smp_cond_acquire() sites for more detail. - * - * This however means that in code like: - * - * spin_lock(A) spin_lock(B) - * spin_unlock_wait(B) spin_is_locked(A) - * do_something() do_something() - * - * Both CPUs can end up running do_something() because the store - * setting _Q_LOCKED_VAL will pass through the loads in - * spin_unlock_wait() and/or spin_is_locked(). + * See queued_spin_unlock_wait(). * - * Avoid this by issuing a full memory barrier between the spin_lock() - * and the loads in spin_unlock_wait() and spin_is_locked(). - * - * Note that regular mutual exclusion doesn't care about this - * delayed store. + * Any !0 state indicates it is locked, even if _Q_LOCKED_VAL + * isn't immediately observable. */ - smp_mb(); - return atomic_read(&lock->val) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK; + return atomic_read(&lock->val); } +#endif /** * queued_spin_value_unlocked - is the spinlock structure unlocked? @@ -122,21 +118,6 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) } #endif -/** - * queued_spin_unlock_wait - wait until current lock holder releases the lock - * @lock : Pointer to queued spinlock structure - * - * There is a very slight possibility of live-lock if the lockers keep coming - * and the waiter is just unfortunate enough to not see any unlock state. - */ -static inline void queued_spin_unlock_wait(struct qspinlock *lock) -{ - /* See queued_spin_is_locked() */ - smp_mb(); - while (atomic_read(&lock->val) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) - cpu_relax(); -} - #ifndef virt_spin_lock static __always_inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock) { diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c index ce2f75e32ae1..5fc8c311b8fe 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c @@ -267,6 +267,66 @@ static __always_inline u32 __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, #define queued_spin_lock_slowpath native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath #endif +/* + * queued_spin_lock_slowpath() can (load-)ACQUIRE the lock before + * issuing an _unordered_ store to set _Q_LOCKED_VAL. + * + * This means that the store can be delayed, but no later than the + * store-release from the unlock. This means that simply observing + * _Q_LOCKED_VAL is not sufficient to determine if the lock is acquired. + * + * There are two paths that can issue the unordered store: + * + * (1) clear_pending_set_locked(): *,1,0 -> *,0,1 + * + * (2) set_locked(): t,0,0 -> t,0,1 ; t != 0 + * atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(): t,0,0 -> 0,0,1 + * + * However, in both cases we have other !0 state we've set before to queue + * ourseves: + * + * For (1) we have the atomic_cmpxchg_acquire() that set _Q_PENDING_VAL, our + * load is constrained by that ACQUIRE to not pass before that, and thus must + * observe the store. + * + * For (2) we have a more intersting scenario. We enqueue ourselves using + * xchg_tail(), which ends up being a RELEASE. This in itself is not + * sufficient, however that is followed by an smp_cond_acquire() on the same + * word, giving a RELEASE->ACQUIRE ordering. This again constrains our load and + * guarantees we must observe that store. + * + * Therefore both cases have other !0 state that is observable before the + * unordered locked byte store comes through. This means we can use that to + * wait for the lock store, and then wait for an unlock. + */ +#ifndef queued_spin_unlock_wait +void queued_spin_unlock_wait(struct qspinlock *lock) +{ + u32 val; + + for (;;) { + val = atomic_read(&lock->val); + + if (!val) /* not locked, we're done */ + goto done; + + if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) /* locked, go wait for unlock */ + break; + + /* not locked, but pending, wait until we observe the lock */ + cpu_relax(); + } + + /* any unlock is good */ + while (atomic_read(&lock->val) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) + cpu_relax(); + +done: + smp_rmb(); /* CTRL + RMB -> ACQUIRE */ +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_unlock_wait); +#endif + #endif /* _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH */ /** |