diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 36 |
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig index 8ab7103d4f44..61ffc12d8fd8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig @@ -14,13 +14,6 @@ config CAN_C_CAN_PLATFORM SPEAr1310 and SPEAr320 evaluation boards & TI (www.ti.com) boards like am335x, dm814x, dm813x and dm811x. -config CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING - bool "Force a strict RX CAN frame order (may cause frame loss)" - ---help--- - The RX split buffer prevents packet reordering but can cause packet - loss. Only enable this option when you accept to lose CAN frames - in favour of getting the received CAN frames in the correct order. - config CAN_C_CAN_PCI tristate "Generic PCI Bus based C_CAN/D_CAN driver" depends on PCI diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c index a2ca820b5373..95e04e2002da 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c @@ -732,26 +732,12 @@ static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend) static inline void c_can_rx_object_get(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj) { -#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING - if (obj < C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST) - c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, IF_COMM_RCV_LOW); - else -#endif c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high); } static inline void c_can_rx_finalize(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj) { -#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING - if (obj < C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST) - priv->rxmasked |= BIT(obj - 1); - else if (obj == C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST) { - priv->rxmasked = 0; - /* activate all lower message objects */ - c_can_activate_all_lower_rx_msg_obj(dev, IF_RX); - } -#endif if (priv->type != BOSCH_D_CAN) c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, IF_COMM_CLR_NEWDAT); } @@ -799,9 +785,6 @@ static inline u32 c_can_get_pending(struct c_can_priv *priv) { u32 pend = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_NEWDAT1_REG); -#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING - pend &= ~priv->rxmasked; -#endif return pend; } @@ -814,25 +797,6 @@ static inline u32 c_can_get_pending(struct c_can_priv *priv) * has arrived. To work-around this issue, we keep two groups of message * objects whose partitioning is defined by C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_SPLIT. * - * If CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING = y - * - * To ensure in-order frame reception we use the following - * approach while re-activating a message object to receive further - * frames: - * - if the current message object number is lower than - * C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST, do not clear the NEWDAT bit while clearing - * the INTPND bit. - * - if the current message object number is equal to - * C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST then clear the NEWDAT bit of all lower - * receive message objects. - * - if the current message object number is greater than - * C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST then clear the NEWDAT bit of - * only this message object. - * - * This can cause packet loss! - * - * If CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING = n - * * We clear the newdat bit right away. * * This can result in packet reordering when the readout is slow. |