diff options
| author | Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@bytedance.com> | 2020-12-24 04:12:42 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2020-12-29 17:16:21 +0300 |
| commit | da4282c17d695b9311608aa63b3c633e649aadea (patch) | |
| tree | e30029d0d62e6d300417bd910b79d068f50a87b8 /tools | |
| parent | 4bfc4714849d005e6835bcffa3c29ebd6e5ee35d (diff) | |
| download | linux-da4282c17d695b9311608aa63b3c633e649aadea.tar.xz | |
selftests/bpf: Fix a compile error for BPF_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC
When CONFIG_BPF_LSM is not configured, running bpf selftesting will show
BPF_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC undefined error for bprm_opts.c.
The problem is that bprm_opts.c includes vmliunx.h. The vmlinux.h is
generated by "bpftool btf dump file ./vmlinux format c". On the other
hand, BPF_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC is defined in include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
and used only in bpf_lsm.c. When CONFIG_BPF_LSM is not set, bpf_lsm
will not be compiled, so vmlinux.h will not include definition of
BPF_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC.
Ideally, we want to compile bpf selftest regardless of the configuration
setting, so change the include file from vmlinux.h to bpf.h.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201224011242.585967-1-jiang.wang@bytedance.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bprm_opts.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bprm_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bprm_opts.c index 5bfef2887e70..418d9c6d4952 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bprm_opts.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bprm_opts.c @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ * Copyright 2020 Google LLC. */ -#include "vmlinux.h" +#include <linux/bpf.h> #include <errno.h> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> |