diff options
| author | Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com> | 2020-04-15 07:15:01 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> | 2020-09-09 02:26:45 +0300 |
| commit | a23042882ff29ae2df04f46ac0d4c50f66e7e497 (patch) | |
| tree | 1651c0bb38233d1a5411df139e1e1baf99cad481 /tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | |
| parent | 2d9ca267a944c2b6ed5b4d750b1cf0407b6262b4 (diff) | |
| download | linux-a23042882ff29ae2df04f46ac0d4c50f66e7e497.tar.xz | |
selftests/seccomp: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator for flags
This silences the following coccinelle warning:
"WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3131:17-18: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3133:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3134:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c:3135:18-19: WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |
Fixes: 6a21cc50f0c7 ("seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1586924101-65940-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index bfb382580493..c5002fc25b00 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -3173,11 +3173,11 @@ skip: static int user_notif_syscall(int nr, unsigned int flags) { struct sock_filter filter[] = { - BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS, offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), - BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, nr, 0, 1), - BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF), - BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), + BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, nr, 0, 1), + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF), + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), }; struct sock_fprog prog = { |