diff options
| author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-06-20 07:06:27 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2019-06-20 07:06:27 +0300 |
| commit | dca73a65a68329ee386d3ff473152bac66eaab39 (patch) | |
| tree | 97c41afb932bdd6cbe67e7ffc38bfe5952c97798 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | |
| parent | 497ad9f5b2dc86b733761b9afa44ecfa2f17be65 (diff) | |
| parent | 94079b64255fe40b9b53fd2e4081f68b9b14f54a (diff) | |
| download | linux-dca73a65a68329ee386d3ff473152bac66eaab39.tar.xz | |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2019-06-19
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
The main changes are:
1) new SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH_BPF setsocktopt, from Martin.
2) BTF based map definition, from Andrii.
3) support bpf_map_lookup_elem for xskmap, from Jonathan.
4) bounded loops and scalar precision logic in the verifier, from Alexei.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 6cb307201958..c5514daf8865 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -234,10 +234,10 @@ static void bpf_fill_scale1(struct bpf_test *self) insn[i++] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, -8 * (k % 64 + 1)); } - /* every jump adds 1 step to insn_processed, so to stay exactly - * within 1m limit add MAX_TEST_INSNS - MAX_JMP_SEQ - 1 MOVs and 1 EXIT + /* is_state_visited() doesn't allocate state for pruning for every jump. + * Hence multiply jmps by 4 to accommodate that heuristic */ - while (i < MAX_TEST_INSNS - MAX_JMP_SEQ - 1) + while (i < MAX_TEST_INSNS - MAX_JMP_SEQ * 4) insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 42); insn[i] = BPF_EXIT_INSN(); self->prog_len = i + 1; @@ -266,10 +266,7 @@ static void bpf_fill_scale2(struct bpf_test *self) insn[i++] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, -8 * (k % (64 - 4 * FUNC_NEST) + 1)); } - /* every jump adds 1 step to insn_processed, so to stay exactly - * within 1m limit add MAX_TEST_INSNS - MAX_JMP_SEQ - 1 MOVs and 1 EXIT - */ - while (i < MAX_TEST_INSNS - MAX_JMP_SEQ - 1) + while (i < MAX_TEST_INSNS - MAX_JMP_SEQ * 4) insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 42); insn[i] = BPF_EXIT_INSN(); self->prog_len = i + 1; |