summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>2024-01-31 03:17:40 +0300
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2024-06-21 15:54:16 +0300
commita1a153fc73cc9184bcdfcd3a9f619705e35e53b7 (patch)
tree539f7d8165e8d049ce6e645a27c5f4db599c443e /tools/perf
parentfeb3352af74273424cd4ae68650196a73a5a9d54 (diff)
downloadlinux-a1a153fc73cc9184bcdfcd3a9f619705e35e53b7.tar.xz
nfsd: don't call locks_release_private() twice concurrently
[ Upstream commit 05eda6e75773592760285e10ac86c56d683be17f ] It is possible for free_blocked_lock() to be called twice concurrently, once from nfsd4_lock() and once from nfsd4_release_lockowner() calling remove_blocked_locks(). This is why a kref was added. It is perfectly safe for locks_delete_block() and kref_put() to be called in parallel as they use locking or atomicity respectively as protection. However locks_release_private() has no locking. It is safe for it to be called twice sequentially, but not concurrently. This patch moves that call from free_blocked_lock() where it could race with itself, to free_nbl() where it cannot. This will slightly delay the freeing of private info or release of the owner - but not by much. It is arguably more natural for this freeing to happen in free_nbl() where the structure itself is freed. This bug was found by code inspection - it has not been seen in practice. Fixes: 47446d74f170 ("nfsd4: add refcount for nfsd4_blocked_lock") Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions