diff options
author | Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> | 2019-09-26 02:46:02 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-09-26 03:51:39 +0300 |
commit | c7d4f7eeb6da9408e9ba7475fe2624bdb4d837d0 (patch) | |
tree | c5ffd56e31d863a0970be1b1499fc761ec1fc43c /tools/include/linux/rbtree.h | |
parent | 0f74914071ab7e7b78731ed62bf350e3a344e0a5 (diff) | |
download | linux-c7d4f7eeb6da9408e9ba7475fe2624bdb4d837d0.tar.xz |
rbtree: avoid generating code twice for the cached versions (tools copy)
As was already noted in rbtree.h, the logic to cache rb_first (or
rb_last) can easily be implemented externally to the core rbtree api.
This commit takes the changes applied to the include/linux/ and lib/
rbtree files in 9f973cb38088 ("lib/rbtree: avoid generating code twice
for the cached versions"), and applies these to the
tools/include/linux/ and tools/lib/ files as well to keep them
synchronized.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190703034812.53002-1-walken@google.com
Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/include/linux/rbtree.h')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/include/linux/rbtree.h | 71 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h b/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h index d83763a5327c..e03b1ea23e0e 100644 --- a/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h +++ b/tools/include/linux/rbtree.h @@ -31,25 +31,9 @@ struct rb_root { struct rb_node *rb_node; }; -/* - * Leftmost-cached rbtrees. - * - * We do not cache the rightmost node based on footprint - * size vs number of potential users that could benefit - * from O(1) rb_last(). Just not worth it, users that want - * this feature can always implement the logic explicitly. - * Furthermore, users that want to cache both pointers may - * find it a bit asymmetric, but that's ok. - */ -struct rb_root_cached { - struct rb_root rb_root; - struct rb_node *rb_leftmost; -}; - #define rb_parent(r) ((struct rb_node *)((r)->__rb_parent_color & ~3)) #define RB_ROOT (struct rb_root) { NULL, } -#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL } #define rb_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member) #define RB_EMPTY_ROOT(root) (READ_ONCE((root)->rb_node) == NULL) @@ -71,12 +55,6 @@ extern struct rb_node *rb_prev(const struct rb_node *); extern struct rb_node *rb_first(const struct rb_root *); extern struct rb_node *rb_last(const struct rb_root *); -extern void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *, - struct rb_root_cached *, bool); -extern void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root_cached *); -/* Same as rb_first(), but O(1) */ -#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost - /* Postorder iteration - always visit the parent after its children */ extern struct rb_node *rb_first_postorder(const struct rb_root *); extern struct rb_node *rb_next_postorder(const struct rb_node *); @@ -84,8 +62,6 @@ extern struct rb_node *rb_next_postorder(const struct rb_node *); /* Fast replacement of a single node without remove/rebalance/add/rebalance */ extern void rb_replace_node(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new, struct rb_root *root); -extern void rb_replace_node_cached(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new, - struct rb_root_cached *root); static inline void rb_link_node(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *parent, struct rb_node **rb_link) @@ -129,4 +105,51 @@ static inline void rb_erase_init(struct rb_node *n, struct rb_root *root) rb_erase(n, root); RB_CLEAR_NODE(n); } + +/* + * Leftmost-cached rbtrees. + * + * We do not cache the rightmost node based on footprint + * size vs number of potential users that could benefit + * from O(1) rb_last(). Just not worth it, users that want + * this feature can always implement the logic explicitly. + * Furthermore, users that want to cache both pointers may + * find it a bit asymmetric, but that's ok. + */ +struct rb_root_cached { + struct rb_root rb_root; + struct rb_node *rb_leftmost; +}; + +#define RB_ROOT_CACHED (struct rb_root_cached) { {NULL, }, NULL } + +/* Same as rb_first(), but O(1) */ +#define rb_first_cached(root) (root)->rb_leftmost + +static inline void rb_insert_color_cached(struct rb_node *node, + struct rb_root_cached *root, + bool leftmost) +{ + if (leftmost) + root->rb_leftmost = node; + rb_insert_color(node, &root->rb_root); +} + +static inline void rb_erase_cached(struct rb_node *node, + struct rb_root_cached *root) +{ + if (root->rb_leftmost == node) + root->rb_leftmost = rb_next(node); + rb_erase(node, &root->rb_root); +} + +static inline void rb_replace_node_cached(struct rb_node *victim, + struct rb_node *new, + struct rb_root_cached *root) +{ + if (root->rb_leftmost == victim) + root->rb_leftmost = new; + rb_replace_node(victim, new, &root->rb_root); +} + #endif /* __TOOLS_LINUX_PERF_RBTREE_H */ |