diff options
author | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> | 2013-07-01 16:12:40 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2013-07-22 05:19:00 +0400 |
commit | 3cba6eb1c7cd51176b972ae47736d8e7a0720706 (patch) | |
tree | 28ec853cb9bd3fdefd7e8a5f2bf63772295c9fac /scripts/module-common.lds | |
parent | 76a4f3b621d867ea7e27a1b985d7e1430355fac6 (diff) | |
download | linux-3cba6eb1c7cd51176b972ae47736d8e7a0720706.tar.xz |
jbd2: fix theoretical race in jbd2__journal_restart
commit 39c04153fda8c32e85b51c96eb5511a326ad7609 upstream.
Once we decrement transaction->t_updates, if this is the last handle
holding the transaction from closing, and once we release the
t_handle_lock spinlock, it's possible for the transaction to commit
and be released. In practice with normal kernels, this probably won't
happen, since the commit happens in a separate kernel thread and it's
unlikely this could all happen within the space of a few CPU cycles.
On the other hand, with a real-time kernel, this could potentially
happen, so save the tid found in transaction->t_tid before we release
t_handle_lock. It would require an insane configuration, such as one
where the jbd2 thread was set to a very high real-time priority,
perhaps because a high priority real-time thread is trying to read or
write to a file system. But some people who use real-time kernels
have been known to do insane things, including controlling
laser-wielding industrial robots. :-)
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/module-common.lds')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions