summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>2009-11-07 16:49:18 +0300
committerNicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>2009-11-08 04:14:21 +0300
commit35f029e2514be209eb0e88c7d927f3bcc42a5cc2 (patch)
tree671a2d2ff57277a97633d81b1e3a54781a7e2da7 /scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
parent6de95c198729d34a85c88f8844f1c3d57fb6da00 (diff)
downloadlinux-35f029e2514be209eb0e88c7d927f3bcc42a5cc2.tar.xz
[ARM] kirkwood: fix PCI I/O port assignment
Instead of allocating PCI devices I/O port bus addresses from the 000xxxxx I/O port range as intended, due to a bus versus physical address mixup, the Kirkwood PCIe handling code inadvertently allocated I/O port bus addresses from the f20xxxxx address range (which is the physical address range of the PCIe I/O mapping window), but then direct all I/O port accesses to bus addresses 000xxxxx, which would then not be decoded at all. Fix this by setting the base address of the PCIe I/O space struct resource to KIRKWOOD_PCIE_IO_BUS_BASE instead of the incorrect KIRKWOOD_PCIE_IO_PHYS_BASE, and fix up __io() to expect addresses offsetted by the former instead of the latter. (The suggested fix of directing I/O port accesses from the host to bus addresses f20xxxxx instead has the problem that assigning full 32bit I/O port bus addresses (f20xxxxx) doesn't work on all PCI devices, as not all PCI devices implement full 32 bit BAR registers for I/O ports. We should really try to allocate I/O port bus addresses that fit in 16 bits.) Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions