diff options
author | Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> | 2007-03-20 03:04:56 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net> | 2007-03-20 10:09:46 +0300 |
commit | e4ce837de96d58509f5f815ab37a46889788e701 (patch) | |
tree | 573d9e2b11fb0b15e93089a2c32c42e3d162f718 /net/x25/x25_forward.c | |
parent | 749bf9215ed1a8b6edb4bb03693c2b62c6b9c2a4 (diff) | |
download | linux-e4ce837de96d58509f5f815ab37a46889788e701.tar.xz |
[X25] x25_forward_call(): fix NULL dereferences
This patch fixes two NULL dereferences spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/x25/x25_forward.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/x25/x25_forward.c | 88 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_forward.c b/net/x25/x25_forward.c index d339e0c810a8..8738ec7ce693 100644 --- a/net/x25/x25_forward.c +++ b/net/x25/x25_forward.c @@ -26,64 +26,66 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from, short same_lci = 0; int rc = 0; - if ((rt = x25_get_route(dest_addr)) != NULL) { + if ((rt = x25_get_route(dest_addr)) == NULL) + goto out_no_route; - if ((neigh_new = x25_get_neigh(rt->dev)) == NULL) { - /* This shouldnt happen, if it occurs somehow - * do something sensible - */ - goto out_put_route; - } - - /* Avoid a loop. This is the normal exit path for a - * system with only one x.25 iface and default route + if ((neigh_new = x25_get_neigh(rt->dev)) == NULL) { + /* This shouldnt happen, if it occurs somehow + * do something sensible */ - if (rt->dev == from->dev) { - goto out_put_nb; - } + goto out_put_route; + } - /* Remote end sending a call request on an already - * established LCI? It shouldnt happen, just in case.. - */ - read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); - list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) { - x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node); - if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "X.25: call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n"); - same_lci = 1; - } - } - read_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); - - /* Save the forwarding details for future traffic */ - if (!same_lci){ - if ((new_frwd = kmalloc(sizeof(struct x25_forward), - GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){ - rc = -ENOMEM; - goto out_put_nb; - } - new_frwd->lci = lci; - new_frwd->dev1 = rt->dev; - new_frwd->dev2 = from->dev; - write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); - list_add(&new_frwd->node, &x25_forward_list); - write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); + /* Avoid a loop. This is the normal exit path for a + * system with only one x.25 iface and default route + */ + if (rt->dev == from->dev) { + goto out_put_nb; + } + + /* Remote end sending a call request on an already + * established LCI? It shouldnt happen, just in case.. + */ + read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); + list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) { + x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node); + if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) { + printk(KERN_WARNING "X.25: call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n"); + same_lci = 1; } + } + read_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); - /* Forward the call request */ - if ( (skbn = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){ + /* Save the forwarding details for future traffic */ + if (!same_lci){ + if ((new_frwd = kmalloc(sizeof(struct x25_forward), + GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){ + rc = -ENOMEM; goto out_put_nb; } - x25_transmit_link(skbn, neigh_new); - rc = 1; + new_frwd->lci = lci; + new_frwd->dev1 = rt->dev; + new_frwd->dev2 = from->dev; + write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); + list_add(&new_frwd->node, &x25_forward_list); + write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); } + /* Forward the call request */ + if ( (skbn = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){ + goto out_put_nb; + } + x25_transmit_link(skbn, neigh_new); + rc = 1; + out_put_nb: x25_neigh_put(neigh_new); out_put_route: x25_route_put(rt); + +out_no_route: return rc; } |