diff options
author | Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no> | 2017-10-24 18:14:10 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-10-26 11:40:32 +0300 |
commit | 3c91b0c1de8d013490bbc41ce9ee8810ea5baddd (patch) | |
tree | 837720e8983191cdd9b9804988a3d26061c72cbb /net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | |
parent | acfdf7eabea4186a386ba5e656f0c739563cb1a5 (diff) | |
download | linux-3c91b0c1de8d013490bbc41ce9ee8810ea5baddd.tar.xz |
net: dsa: lan9303: Do not disable switch fabric port 0 at .probe
Make the LAN9303 work when lan9303_probe() is called twice.
For some unknown reason the LAN9303 switch fail to forward data when switch
fabric port 0 TX is disabled during probe. (Write of LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0
in lan9303_disable_processing_port().)
In that situation the switch fabric seem to receive frames, because the ALR
is learning addresses. But no frames are transmitted on any of the ports.
In our system lan9303_probe() is called twice, first time
dsa_register_switch() return -EPROBE_DEFER. As an experiment, modified the
code to skip writing LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0, port 0 during the first probe.
Then the switch works as expected.
Resolve the problem by not calling lan9303_disable_processing_port() on
port 0 during probe. Ports 1 and 2 are still disabled.
Although unsatisfying that the exact failure mechanism is not known,
the patch should not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions