diff options
author | NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> | 2010-11-16 08:55:19 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | 2010-12-08 04:39:55 +0300 |
commit | ed2849d3ecfa339435818eeff28f6c3424300cec (patch) | |
tree | 2fbef743779156c2c96afecd8311ff8488a90121 /net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | |
parent | cf7d7e5a1980d1116ee152d25dac382b112b9c17 (diff) | |
download | linux-ed2849d3ecfa339435818eeff28f6c3424300cec.tar.xz |
sunrpc: prevent use-after-free on clearing XPT_BUSY
When an xprt is created, it has a refcount of 1, and XPT_BUSY is set.
The refcount is *not* owned by the thread that created the xprt
(as is clear from the fact that creators never put the reference).
Rather, it is owned by the absence of XPT_DEAD. Once XPT_DEAD is set,
(And XPT_BUSY is clear) that initial reference is dropped and the xprt
can be freed.
So when a creator clears XPT_BUSY it is dropping its only reference and
so must not touch the xprt again.
However svc_recv, after calling ->xpo_accept (and so getting an XPT_BUSY
reference on a new xprt), calls svc_xprt_recieved. This clears
XPT_BUSY and then svc_xprt_enqueue - this last without owning a reference.
This is dangerous and has been seen to leave svc_xprt_enqueue working
with an xprt containing garbage.
So we need to hold an extra counted reference over that call to
svc_xprt_received.
For safety, any time we clear XPT_BUSY and then use the xprt again, we
first get a reference, and the put it again afterwards.
Note that svc_close_all does not need this extra protection as there are
no threads running, and the final free can only be called asynchronously
from such a thread.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c index ea2ff78dcf7b..3f2c5559ca1a 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv, const char *xprt_name, spin_lock(&svc_xprt_class_lock); list_for_each_entry(xcl, &svc_xprt_class_list, xcl_list) { struct svc_xprt *newxprt; + unsigned short newport; if (strcmp(xprt_name, xcl->xcl_name)) continue; @@ -230,8 +231,9 @@ int svc_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv, const char *xprt_name, spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); list_add(&newxprt->xpt_list, &serv->sv_permsocks); spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); + newport = svc_xprt_local_port(newxprt); clear_bit(XPT_BUSY, &newxprt->xpt_flags); - return svc_xprt_local_port(newxprt); + return newport; } err: spin_unlock(&svc_xprt_class_lock); @@ -425,8 +427,13 @@ void svc_xprt_received(struct svc_xprt *xprt) { BUG_ON(!test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags)); xprt->xpt_pool = NULL; + /* As soon as we clear busy, the xprt could be closed and + * 'put', so we need a reference to call svc_xprt_enqueue with: + */ + svc_xprt_get(xprt); clear_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags); svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt); + svc_xprt_put(xprt); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_xprt_received); |