Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec

Conflicts:
	net/ipv4/ip_vti.c

Steffen Klassert says:

====================
pull request (net): ipsec 2014-05-15

This pull request has a merge conflict in net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
between commit 8d89dcdf80d8 ("vti: don't allow to add the same
tunnel twice") and commit a32452366b72  ("vti4:Don't count header
length twice"). It can be solved like it is done in linux-next.

1) Fix a ipv6 xfrm output crash when a packet is rerouted
   by netfilter to not use IPsec.

2) vti4 counts some header lengths twice leading to an incorrect
   device mtu. Fix this by counting these headers only once.

3) We don't catch the case if an unsupported protocol is submitted
   to the xfrm protocol handlers, this can lead to NULL pointer
   dereferences. Fix this by adding the appropriate checks.

4) vti6 may unregister pernet ops twice on init errors.
   Fix this by removing one of the calls to do it only once.
   From Mathias Krause.

5) Set the vti tunnel mark before doing a lookup in the error
   handlers. Otherwise we don't find the correct xfrm state.
====================

The conflict in ip_vti.c was simple, 'net' had a commit
removing a line from vti_tunnel_init() and this tree
being merged had a commit adding a line to the same
location.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
index 7f7b243e8139..a2ce0101eaac 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
@@ -50,8 +50,12 @@ int xfrm4_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 protocol, int err)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct xfrm4_protocol *handler;
+	struct xfrm4_protocol __rcu **head = proto_handlers(protocol);
 
-	for_each_protocol_rcu(*proto_handlers(protocol), handler)
+	if (!head)
+		return 0;
+
+	for_each_protocol_rcu(*head, handler)
 		if ((ret = handler->cb_handler(skb, err)) <= 0)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -64,15 +68,20 @@ int xfrm4_rcv_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi,
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct xfrm4_protocol *handler;
+	struct xfrm4_protocol __rcu **head = proto_handlers(nexthdr);
 
 	XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4 = NULL;
 	XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->family = AF_INET;
 	XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->daddroff = offsetof(struct iphdr, daddr);
 
-	for_each_protocol_rcu(*proto_handlers(nexthdr), handler)
+	if (!head)
+		goto out;
+
+	for_each_protocol_rcu(*head, handler)
 		if ((ret = handler->input_handler(skb, nexthdr, spi, encap_type)) != -EINVAL)
 			return ret;
 
+out:
 	icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_PORT_UNREACH, 0);
 
 	kfree_skb(skb);
@@ -208,6 +217,9 @@ int xfrm4_protocol_register(struct xfrm4_protocol *handler,
 	int ret = -EEXIST;
 	int priority = handler->priority;
 
+	if (!proto_handlers(protocol) || !netproto(protocol))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	mutex_lock(&xfrm4_protocol_mutex);
 
 	if (!rcu_dereference_protected(*proto_handlers(protocol),
@@ -250,6 +262,9 @@ int xfrm4_protocol_deregister(struct xfrm4_protocol *handler,
 	struct xfrm4_protocol *t;
 	int ret = -ENOENT;
 
+	if (!proto_handlers(protocol) || !netproto(protocol))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	mutex_lock(&xfrm4_protocol_mutex);
 
 	for (pprev = proto_handlers(protocol);