diff options
| author | Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> | 2021-09-03 01:00:26 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-09-03 19:58:17 +0300 |
| commit | a7259df7670240ee03b0cfce8a3e5d3773911e24 (patch) | |
| tree | 5ebc8853e9b52196d42fa397fc298bb1cacb9019 /mm | |
| parent | 38b031dd4d03542d963eebe600d67ea34f47eb65 (diff) | |
| download | linux-a7259df7670240ee03b0cfce8a3e5d3773911e24.tar.xz | |
memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private
There are a lot of uses of memblock_find_in_range() along with
memblock_reserve() from the times memblock allocation APIs did not exist.
memblock_find_in_range() is the very core of memblock allocations, so any
future changes to its internal behaviour would mandate updates of all the
users outside memblock.
Replace the calls to memblock_find_in_range() with an equivalent calls to
memblock_phys_alloc() and memblock_phys_alloc_range() and make
memblock_find_in_range() private method of memblock.
This simplifies the callers, ensures that (unlikely) errors in
memblock_reserve() are handled and improves maintainability of
memblock_find_in_range().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210816122622.30279-1-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> [arm64]
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shtuemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> [ACPI]
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr> [riscv]
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memblock.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index a69449bffc8d..e6b4654f9dfd 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size, * Return: * Found address on success, 0 on failure. */ -phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, +static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align) { |