summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/slab_common.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-03-09 18:56:08 +0300
committerDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>2020-05-12 22:06:14 +0300
commita4e439a6f628a52f7074c9d73ec7eb4f6c1a4dfc (patch)
tree7545882bd15e3a31f12ac1359d973ed892bb99af /mm/slab_common.c
parent1d2cc5ac6f6668cc15216d51051103c61467d7e8 (diff)
downloadlinux-a4e439a6f628a52f7074c9d73ec7eb4f6c1a4dfc.tar.xz
dlm: dlm_internal: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/slab_common.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions