diff options
author | Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> | 2024-07-11 22:19:56 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2024-08-03 09:54:11 +0300 |
commit | d6510f234c7d117790397f9bb150816b0a954a04 (patch) | |
tree | d5a11e85655ff4a81df79565a53a745cd1be2965 /mm/kasan | |
parent | 99a49b670ede46ad6f47eef2c93bb31f7db8dfd5 (diff) | |
download | linux-d6510f234c7d117790397f9bb150816b0a954a04.tar.xz |
mm/mglru: fix div-by-zero in vmpressure_calc_level()
commit 8b671fe1a879923ecfb72dda6caf01460dd885ef upstream.
evict_folios() uses a second pass to reclaim folios that have gone through
page writeback and become clean before it finishes the first pass, since
folio_rotate_reclaimable() cannot handle those folios due to the
isolation.
The second pass tries to avoid potential double counting by deducting
scan_control->nr_scanned. However, this can result in underflow of
nr_scanned, under a condition where shrink_folio_list() does not increment
nr_scanned, i.e., when folio_trylock() fails.
The underflow can cause the divisor, i.e., scale=scanned+reclaimed in
vmpressure_calc_level(), to become zero, resulting in the following crash:
[exception RIP: vmpressure_work_fn+101]
process_one_work at ffffffffa3313f2b
Since scan_control->nr_scanned has no established semantics, the potential
double counting has minimal risks. Therefore, fix the problem by not
deducting scan_control->nr_scanned in evict_folios().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711191957.939105-1-yuzhao@google.com
Fixes: 359a5e1416ca ("mm: multi-gen LRU: retry folios written back while isolated")
Reported-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@ixsystems.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/kasan')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions