diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-01-13 01:59:50 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-01-13 01:59:50 +0300 |
commit | 42bff4d0f9b9c8b669c5cef25c5116f41eb45c6b (patch) | |
tree | fe9cefffc83c2e8cb4afe8d5fbfa632691dc3e91 /include | |
parent | fef018d8199661962b5fc0f0d1501caa54b2b533 (diff) | |
parent | 7afc0e7f681e6efd6b826f003fc14c17b5093643 (diff) | |
download | linux-42bff4d0f9b9c8b669c5cef25c5116f41eb45c6b.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'pwm/for-6.8-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm
Pull pwm updates from Thierry Reding:
"This contains a bunch of cleanups and simplifications across the
board, as well as a number of small fixes.
Perhaps the most notable change here is the addition of an API that
allows PWMs to be used in atomic contexts, which is useful when time-
critical operations are involved, such as using a PWM to generate IR
signals.
Finally, I have decided to step down as PWM subsystem maintainer. Due
to other responsibilities I have lately not been able to find the time
that the subsystem deserves and Uwe, who has been helping out a lot
for the past few years and has many things planned for the future, has
kindly volunteered to take over. I have no doubt that he will be a
suitable replacement"
* tag 'pwm/for-6.8-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm: (44 commits)
MAINTAINERS: pwm: Thierry steps down, Uwe takes over
pwm: linux/pwm.h: fix Excess kernel-doc description warning
pwm: Add pwm_apply_state() compatibility stub
pwm: cros-ec: Drop documentation for dropped struct member
pwm: Drop two unused API functions
pwm: lpc18xx-sct: Don't modify the cached period of other PWM outputs
pwm: meson: Simplify using dev_err_probe()
pwm: stmpe: Silence duplicate error messages
pwm: Reduce number of pointer dereferences in pwm_device_request()
pwm: crc: Use consistent variable naming for driver data
pwm: omap-dmtimer: Drop locking
dt-bindings: pwm: ti,pwm-omap-dmtimer: Update binding for yaml
media: pwm-ir-tx: Trigger edges from hrtimer interrupt context
pwm: bcm2835: Allow PWM driver to be used in atomic context
pwm: Make it possible to apply PWM changes in atomic context
pwm: renesas: Remove unused include
pwm: Replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP
pwm: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()
pwm: Stop referencing pwm->chip
pwm: Update kernel doc for struct pwm_chip
...
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/pwm.h | 84 |
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h index cda3597b84f2..fcc2c4496f73 100644 --- a/include/linux/pwm.h +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ struct pwm_state { * @label: name of the PWM device * @flags: flags associated with the PWM device * @hwpwm: per-chip relative index of the PWM device - * @pwm: global index of the PWM device * @chip: PWM chip providing this PWM device * @args: PWM arguments * @state: last applied state @@ -79,7 +78,6 @@ struct pwm_device { const char *label; unsigned long flags; unsigned int hwpwm; - unsigned int pwm; struct pwm_chip *chip; struct pwm_args args; @@ -93,8 +91,8 @@ struct pwm_device { * @state: state to fill with the current PWM state * * The returned PWM state represents the state that was applied by a previous call to - * pwm_apply_state(). Drivers may have to slightly tweak that state before programming it to - * hardware. If pwm_apply_state() was never called, this returns either the current hardware + * pwm_apply_might_sleep(). Drivers may have to slightly tweak that state before programming it to + * hardware. If pwm_apply_might_sleep() was never called, this returns either the current hardware * state (if supported) or the default settings. */ static inline void pwm_get_state(const struct pwm_device *pwm, @@ -112,12 +110,6 @@ static inline bool pwm_is_enabled(const struct pwm_device *pwm) return state.enabled; } -static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, u64 period) -{ - if (pwm) - pwm->state.period = period; -} - static inline u64 pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct pwm_state state; @@ -127,12 +119,6 @@ static inline u64 pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm) return state.period; } -static inline void pwm_set_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int duty) -{ - if (pwm) - pwm->state.duty_cycle = duty; -} - static inline u64 pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct pwm_state state; @@ -158,20 +144,20 @@ static inline void pwm_get_args(const struct pwm_device *pwm, } /** - * pwm_init_state() - prepare a new state to be applied with pwm_apply_state() + * pwm_init_state() - prepare a new state to be applied with pwm_apply_might_sleep() * @pwm: PWM device * @state: state to fill with the prepared PWM state * * This functions prepares a state that can later be tweaked and applied - * to the PWM device with pwm_apply_state(). This is a convenient function + * to the PWM device with pwm_apply_might_sleep(). This is a convenient function * that first retrieves the current PWM state and the replaces the period * and polarity fields with the reference values defined in pwm->args. * Once the function returns, you can adjust the ->enabled and ->duty_cycle - * fields according to your needs before calling pwm_apply_state(). + * fields according to your needs before calling pwm_apply_might_sleep(). * * ->duty_cycle is initially set to zero to avoid cases where the current * ->duty_cycle value exceed the pwm_args->period one, which would trigger - * an error if the user calls pwm_apply_state() without adjusting ->duty_cycle + * an error if the user calls pwm_apply_might_sleep() without adjusting ->duty_cycle * first. */ static inline void pwm_init_state(const struct pwm_device *pwm, @@ -227,7 +213,7 @@ pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_state *state, unsigned int scale) * * pwm_init_state(pwm, &state); * pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(&state, 50, 100); - * pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state); + * pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state); * * This functions returns -EINVAL if @duty_cycle and/or @scale are * inconsistent (@scale == 0 or @duty_cycle > @scale). @@ -282,32 +268,33 @@ struct pwm_ops { * @dev: device providing the PWMs * @ops: callbacks for this PWM controller * @owner: module providing this chip - * @base: number of first PWM controlled by this chip + * @id: unique number of this PWM chip * @npwm: number of PWMs controlled by this chip * @of_xlate: request a PWM device given a device tree PWM specifier * @of_pwm_n_cells: number of cells expected in the device tree PWM specifier - * @list: list node for internal use + * @atomic: can the driver's ->apply() be called in atomic context * @pwms: array of PWM devices allocated by the framework */ struct pwm_chip { struct device *dev; const struct pwm_ops *ops; struct module *owner; - int base; + unsigned int id; unsigned int npwm; struct pwm_device * (*of_xlate)(struct pwm_chip *chip, const struct of_phandle_args *args); unsigned int of_pwm_n_cells; + bool atomic; /* only used internally by the PWM framework */ - struct list_head list; struct pwm_device *pwms; }; #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM) /* PWM user APIs */ -int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state); +int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state); +int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state); int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm); /** @@ -335,7 +322,7 @@ static inline int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, state.duty_cycle = duty_ns; state.period = period_ns; - return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state); + return pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state); } /** @@ -356,7 +343,7 @@ static inline int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm) return 0; state.enabled = true; - return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state); + return pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state); } /** @@ -375,7 +362,18 @@ static inline void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm) return; state.enabled = false; - pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state); + pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state); +} + +/** + * pwm_might_sleep() - is pwm_apply_atomic() supported? + * @pwm: PWM device + * + * Returns: false if pwm_apply_atomic() can be called from atomic context. + */ +static inline bool pwm_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm) +{ + return !pwm->chip->atomic; } /* PWM provider APIs */ @@ -406,16 +404,27 @@ struct pwm_device *devm_fwnode_pwm_get(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *con_id); #else -static inline int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, - const struct pwm_state *state) +static inline bool pwm_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm) +{ + return true; +} + +static inline int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm, + const struct pwm_state *state) { might_sleep(); - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + +static inline int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm_device *pwm, + const struct pwm_state *state) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; } static inline int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm) { - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; } static inline int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, @@ -524,7 +533,14 @@ static inline void pwm_apply_args(struct pwm_device *pwm) state.period = pwm->args.period; state.usage_power = false; - pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state); + pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state); +} + +/* only for backwards-compatibility, new code should not use this */ +static inline int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, + const struct pwm_state *state) +{ + return pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, state); } struct pwm_lookup { |